Sandkühler, Hans Jörg (2010). «Analogie». Enzyklopädie Philosophie. Meiner. Archivado desde el original el 11 de marzo de 2021. Consultado el 4 de septiembre de 2021.
newsweek.com
Trudolyubov, Maxim (15 de enero de 2017), «How Putin succeeded in undermining our institutions», Newsweek, consultado el 3 de julio de 2017, «The way the Kremlin has always reacted to reports about corruption or arbitrary police rule, or the state of Russia's penal institutions, is by generating similar reports about the West. Whatever the other party says the answer is always the same: 'Look who's talking.' This age-old technique, dubbed 'whataboutism', is in essence an appeal to hypocrisy; its only purpose is to discredit the opponent, not to refute the original argument.».
npr.org
Kurtzleben, Danielle (17 de marzo de 2017). «Trump Embraces One Of Russia's Favorite Propaganda Tactics — Whataboutism». NPR. Consultado el 20 de mayo de 2017. «This particular brand of changing the subject is called 'whataboutism' – a simple rhetorical tactic heavily used by the Soviet Union and, later, Russia.»
oxforddictionaries.com
en.oxforddictionaries.com
«whataboutism», Oxford Living Dictionaries (Oxford University Press), 2017, archivado desde el original el 9 de marzo de 2017, consultado el 21 de julio de 2017, «Origin - 1990s: from the way in which counter-accusations may take the form of questions introduced by 'What about —?'. ... Also called whataboutery».
philpapers.org
Walton, Douglas N. (1987). «1. A new model of argument». Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. John Benjamins.
Engel, S. Morris (1982). «5. Fallacies of relevance». With Good Reason an Introduction to Informal Fallacies.
stanford.edu
plato.stanford.edu
Hansen, Hans (2020). «Fallacies». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado el 18 de marzo de 2021.
Groarke, Leo (2020). «Informal Logic: 4. Assessing Arguments». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado el 20 de marzo de 2021.
Bartha, Paul (2019). «Analogy and Analogical Reasoning». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Consultado el 21 de enero de 2021.
utm.edu
iep.utm.edu
Dowden, Bradley. «Fallacies». Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Consultado el 19 de marzo de 2021.
web.archive.org
«whataboutism», Oxford Living Dictionaries (Oxford University Press), 2017, archivado desde el original el 9 de marzo de 2017, consultado el 21 de julio de 2017, «Origin - 1990s: from the way in which counter-accusations may take the form of questions introduced by 'What about —?'. ... Also called whataboutery».
Sandkühler, Hans Jörg (2010). «Analogie». Enzyklopädie Philosophie. Meiner. Archivado desde el original el 11 de marzo de 2021. Consultado el 4 de septiembre de 2021.
wsj.com
Zimmer, Ben (9 de junio de 2017). «The Roots of the 'What About?' Ploy». The Wall Street Journal. Consultado el 22 de julio de 2017. «"Whataboutism" is another name for the logical fallacy of "tu quoque" (Latin for "you also"), in which an accusation is met with a counter-accusation, pivoting away from the original criticism. The strategy has been a hallmark of Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda, and some commentators have accused President Donald Trump of mimicking Mr. Putin's use of the technique.»
