Kissinger, Henry (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 137–38. ISBN0-671-65991-X. (requiere registro). «European coalitions were likely to arise to contain Germany's Nazis growing, potentially dominant, power». As well as p. 145: "Unified Germany was achieving the strength to dominate Europe all by itself—an occurrence which Great Britain had always resisted in the past when it came about by conquest".
Clayton, T., Rethinking Hegemony, James Nicholas Publishers, 2006, pp. 202–03.
britannica.com
Encyclopædia Britannica, "Greeks, Romans, and barbarians (from Europe, history of)": "Fusions of power occurred in the shape of leagues of cities, such as the Peloponnesian League, the Delian League, and the Boeotian League. The efficacy of these leagues depended chiefly upon the hegemony of a leading city (Sparta, Athens, or Thebes)"
Encyclopædia Britannica, "Ch'i":
"As a result, Ch'i began to dominate most of China proper; in 651 BC it formed the little states of the area into a league, which was successful in staving off invasions from the semibarbarian regimes to the north and south. Although Ch'i thus gained hegemony over China, its rule was short-lived; after Duke Huan's death, internal disorders caused it to lose the leadership of the new confederation"
Danner, Lukas K.; Martín, Félix E. (2019). «China's hegemonic intentions and trajectory: Will it opt for benevolent, coercive, or Dutch-style hegemony?». Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies(en inglés)6 (2): 186-207. ISSN2050-2680. doi:10.1002/app5.273.
Ikenberry, G. John (Winter 1998–1999). «Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order». International Security23 (3): 43-78. JSTOR2539338. S2CID57566810. doi:10.1162/isec.23.3.43.
Danner, Lukas K.; Martín, Félix E. (2019). «China's hegemonic intentions and trajectory: Will it opt for benevolent, coercive, or Dutch-style hegemony?». Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies(en inglés)6 (2): 186-207. ISSN2050-2680. doi:10.1002/app5.273.
Ikenberry, G. John (Winter 1998–1999). «Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order». International Security23 (3): 43-78. JSTOR2539338. S2CID57566810. doi:10.1162/isec.23.3.43.
Ikenberry, G. John (Winter 1998–1999). «Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order». International Security23 (3): 43-78. JSTOR2539338. S2CID57566810. doi:10.1162/isec.23.3.43.