Mujer (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Mujer" in Spanish language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Spanish rank
2nd place
2nd place
5th place
5th place
33rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
245th place
9th place
15th place
79th place
14th place
43rd place
9,868th place
2,293rd place
23rd place
56th place
632nd place
35th place
1,327th place
1,381st place
207th place
164th place
low place
low place
251st place
436th place
1,521st place
1,285th place
182nd place
283rd place
4th place
13th place
621st place
754th place
3rd place
7th place
4,656th place
4,568th place
low place
low place
2,056th place
2,470th place
low place
3,278th place
18th place
23rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,557th place
low place
low place
89th place
6th place
2,036th place
218th place
low place
low place
394th place
34th place
5,389th place
1,189th place
584th place
38th place

aap.org (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

publications.aap.org

  • Anderson SE, Dallal GE, Must A (2003). "Relative weight and race influence average age at menarche: results from two nationally representative surveys of US girls studied 25 years apart". Pediatrics. 111 (4 Pt 1): 844–850. doi:10.1542/peds.111.4.844. PMID 12671122.

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; Spanish: 43rd place)

apa.org (Global: 1,327th place; Spanish: 1,381st place)

apuntesdedemografia.com (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

apuntesdedemografia.wordpress.com (Global: low place; Spanish: 8,557th place)

berkeley.edu (Global: 621st place; Spanish: 754th place)

ucmp.berkeley.edu

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Spanish: 7th place)

books.google.es (Global: 245th place; Spanish: 9th place)

cdc.gov (Global: 251st place; Spanish: 436th place)

census.gov (Global: 18th place; Spanish: 23rd place)

cis.es (Global: low place; Spanish: 3,278th place)

reis.cis.es

csic.es (Global: 2,036th place; Spanish: 218th place)

digital.csic.es

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Spanish: 2nd place)

dx.doi.org

doi.org

elcuadernodigital.com (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

eldiario.es (Global: 584th place; Spanish: 38th place)

elpais.com (Global: 89th place; Spanish: 6th place)

economia.elpais.com

iapt-taxon.org (Global: 9,868th place; Spanish: 2,293rd place)

  • Stearn, William T. (1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon (en inglés) 11 (4): 109-113. ISSN 0040-0262. JSTOR 1217734. doi:10.2307/1217734. «In his Systema Naturae (Leyden, 1735) he [Linnaeus] used them with their traditional associations for metals. Their first biological use is in the Linnaean dissertation Plantae hybridae xxx sistit J. J. Haartman (1751) where in discussing hybrid plants Linnaeus denoted the supposed female parent species by the sign ♀, the male parent by the sign ♂, the hybrid by ☿: 'matrem signo ♀, patrem ♂ & plantam hybridam ☿ designavero'. In subsequent publications he retained the signs ♀ and ♂ for male and female individuals but discarded ☿ for hybrids; the last are now indicated by the multiplication sign ×. Linnaeus's first general use of the signs of ♀ and ♂ was in his Species Plantarum (1753) written between 1746 and 1752 and surveying concisely the whole plant kingdom as then known. ... In order to save space Linnaeus employed the astronomical symbols of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and the Sun to denote woody, hebaceous perennial, biennial and annual plants respectively [ed.: the orbital periods of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and Earth about the Sun are 29, 12, 2 and 1 year] ... and Mercury, Mars and Venus for the hermaphrodite, male and female conditions ... Later, in his Mantissa Plantarum (1767) and Mantissa Plantarum altera (1771), Linnaeus regularly used ♂, ♀ and ☿ for male, female and hermaphrodite flowers respectively. Their aptness made them easy to remember and their convenience led to their general acceptance in zoology as well as botany. Koelreuter found them especially convenient when recording his experiments in hybridization; as late as 1778 he used the sign ☿ to denote a hybrid plant.»

ipss.go.jp (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

issn.org (Global: 33rd place; Spanish: 3rd place)

portal.issn.org

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; Spanish: 56th place)

  • Stearn, William T. (1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon (en inglés) 11 (4): 109-113. ISSN 0040-0262. JSTOR 1217734. doi:10.2307/1217734. «In his Systema Naturae (Leyden, 1735) he [Linnaeus] used them with their traditional associations for metals. Their first biological use is in the Linnaean dissertation Plantae hybridae xxx sistit J. J. Haartman (1751) where in discussing hybrid plants Linnaeus denoted the supposed female parent species by the sign ♀, the male parent by the sign ♂, the hybrid by ☿: 'matrem signo ♀, patrem ♂ & plantam hybridam ☿ designavero'. In subsequent publications he retained the signs ♀ and ♂ for male and female individuals but discarded ☿ for hybrids; the last are now indicated by the multiplication sign ×. Linnaeus's first general use of the signs of ♀ and ♂ was in his Species Plantarum (1753) written between 1746 and 1752 and surveying concisely the whole plant kingdom as then known. ... In order to save space Linnaeus employed the astronomical symbols of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and the Sun to denote woody, hebaceous perennial, biennial and annual plants respectively [ed.: the orbital periods of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and Earth about the Sun are 29, 12, 2 and 1 year] ... and Mercury, Mars and Venus for the hermaphrodite, male and female conditions ... Later, in his Mantissa Plantarum (1767) and Mantissa Plantarum altera (1771), Linnaeus regularly used ♂, ♀ and ☿ for male, female and hermaphrodite flowers respectively. Their aptness made them easy to remember and their convenience led to their general acceptance in zoology as well as botany. Koelreuter found them especially convenient when recording his experiments in hybridization; as late as 1778 he used the sign ☿ to denote a hybrid plant.»

lavanguardia.com (Global: 394th place; Spanish: 34th place)

medlineplus.gov (Global: 1,521st place; Spanish: 1,285th place)

nature.com (Global: 207th place; Spanish: 164th place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; Spanish: 5th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

populationmatters.org (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

rae.es (Global: 632nd place; Spanish: 35th place)

dle.rae.es

  • Real Academia Española. «mujer». Diccionario de la lengua española (23.ª edición). Consultado el 5 de mayo de 2015.

scienceblog.com (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

sciencenews.org (Global: 4,656th place; Spanish: 4,568th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; Spanish: 79th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

springer.com (Global: 182nd place; Spanish: 283rd place)

link.springer.com

uab.cat (Global: 5,389th place; Spanish: 1,189th place)

ddd.uab.cat

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Spanish: 1st place)

webmd.com (Global: 2,056th place; Spanish: 2,470th place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Spanish: 13th place)

search.worldcat.org