NewSpace (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "NewSpace" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Spanish rank
1st place
1st place
388th place
684th place
34th place
84th place
24th place
40th place
115th place
430th place
9,868th place
low place
1,040th place
2,203rd place
680th place
1,988th place
75th place
80th place
1,009th place
2,561st place
low place
low place
54th place
89th place
1,181st place
2,820th place
1,876th place
3,788th place
92nd place
235th place
929th place
63rd place
low place
low place
6th place
5th place
869th place
285th place
79th place
179th place
low place
low place
5,134th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,398th place
397th place
low place
low place
7th place
15th place
4,229th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

americaninno.com

archive.org

arstechnica.com

aviationweek.com

axiomspace.com

breakingdefense.com

cbc.ca

cbslocal.com

boston.cbslocal.com

eisacademy.org

europapress.es

faa.gov

fastcompany.com

files.wordpress.com

rjacobson.files.wordpress.com

forbes.com

gatewayspaceport.com

gmv.com

imprimalia3d.com

kqed.org

ww2.kqed.org

nasa.gov

ntrs.nasa.gov

nmas1.org

npr.org

nytimes.com

tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com

orfonline.org

spacefrontier.org

newspace.spacefrontier.org

  • «NewSpace 2017: Convergence». Archivado desde el original el 26 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 10 de marzo de 2017. «NewSpace converges every vertical of the space industry together with transformational new partners across sectors. [...] [This] cross-disciplinary collaboration [is] critical to creating a sustainable space economy, which in turn fuels innovation in areas from healthcare to construction.» 

spacenews.com

thespiritsbusiness.com

washingtonpost.com

  • Achenbach, Joel (23 de noviembre de 2013). «Which way to space? Flights of fancy may launch the industry’s future». washingtonpost.com. The Washington Post. Archivado desde el original el 19 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 21 de febrero de 2017. «To hear the dreamers tell it, this is the next Silicon Valley. The Mojave Air and Space Port is the spiritual heart of the industry that people call 'New Space.' [...] Old Space (and this is still the dreamers talking) is slow, bureaucratic, government-directed, completely top-down. Old Space is NASA, cautious and halting, supervising every project down to the last thousand-dollar widget. Old Space is Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop Grumman. Old Space coasts on the glory of the Apollo era and isn’t entirely sure what to do next. [...] New Space is the opposite of all that. It’s wild. It’s commercial, bootstrapping, imaginative, right up to the point of being (and this is no longer the dreamers talking) delusional. [...] Many of the New Space enterprises are still in the PowerPoint stage, with business models built around spaceships that haven’t yet gone to space. A bold attitude and good marketing aren’t enough to put a vehicle into orbit. The skeptics among the Old Space people will say to the upstarts: Where’s your rocket? How many times have you launched? Can you deliver reliably? Repeatedly? Safely? We put a man on the moon — what have you done? [...] Old Space and New Space turn out to be symbiotic. New Space companies need NASA contracts, and NASA needs New Space companies to pick up the agency’s slack.» 
  • Achenbach, Joel (21 de febrero de 2017). «NASA, heeding Trump, may add astronauts to a test flight moon mission». washingtonpost.com. Archivado desde el original el 16 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 17 de febrero de 2017. «Newt Gingrich, an influential adviser to Trump when it comes to space issues, is among those pushing for a more entrepreneurial space program. In an email to The Washington Post, Gingrich...blasted NASA for becoming an agency that avoids risk, and said the space program should leverage the enthusiasm and money of the many billionaires interested in commercializing space. [...] 'The key is to liberate space from government monopoly and maximize the inventive entrepreneurial spirit of the Wright brothers, Edison, Ford and other classic Americans,' Gingrich wrote. 'Done properly we can be on the moon in President Trump's first term and orbiting Mars by the end of his second term.'». 

web.archive.org

  • Achenbach, Joel (23 de noviembre de 2013). «Which way to space? Flights of fancy may launch the industry’s future». washingtonpost.com. The Washington Post. Archivado desde el original el 19 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 21 de febrero de 2017. «To hear the dreamers tell it, this is the next Silicon Valley. The Mojave Air and Space Port is the spiritual heart of the industry that people call 'New Space.' [...] Old Space (and this is still the dreamers talking) is slow, bureaucratic, government-directed, completely top-down. Old Space is NASA, cautious and halting, supervising every project down to the last thousand-dollar widget. Old Space is Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop Grumman. Old Space coasts on the glory of the Apollo era and isn’t entirely sure what to do next. [...] New Space is the opposite of all that. It’s wild. It’s commercial, bootstrapping, imaginative, right up to the point of being (and this is no longer the dreamers talking) delusional. [...] Many of the New Space enterprises are still in the PowerPoint stage, with business models built around spaceships that haven’t yet gone to space. A bold attitude and good marketing aren’t enough to put a vehicle into orbit. The skeptics among the Old Space people will say to the upstarts: Where’s your rocket? How many times have you launched? Can you deliver reliably? Repeatedly? Safely? We put a man on the moon — what have you done? [...] Old Space and New Space turn out to be symbiotic. New Space companies need NASA contracts, and NASA needs New Space companies to pick up the agency’s slack.» 
  • Achenbach, Joel (21 de febrero de 2017). «NASA, heeding Trump, may add astronauts to a test flight moon mission». washingtonpost.com. Archivado desde el original el 16 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 17 de febrero de 2017. «Newt Gingrich, an influential adviser to Trump when it comes to space issues, is among those pushing for a more entrepreneurial space program. In an email to The Washington Post, Gingrich...blasted NASA for becoming an agency that avoids risk, and said the space program should leverage the enthusiasm and money of the many billionaires interested in commercializing space. [...] 'The key is to liberate space from government monopoly and maximize the inventive entrepreneurial spirit of the Wright brothers, Edison, Ford and other classic Americans,' Gingrich wrote. 'Done properly we can be on the moon in President Trump's first term and orbiting Mars by the end of his second term.'». 
  • Dragicevic, Nina (3 de noviembre de 2016). «Meet the Astropreneurs: 5 Companies That Hope to Conquer Mars». cbc.ca. Archivado desde el original el 13 de abril de 2017. Consultado el 12 de abril de 2017. 
  • Kiely, Melita (4 de agosto de 2015). «Ballantine’s creates whisky glass for outer space». thespiritsbusiness.com. Archivado desde el original el 13 de abril de 2017. Consultado el 12 de abril de 2017. 
  • Segran, Elizabeth (16 de abril de 2016). «The Next Frontier for Ambitious Entrepreneurs: Space». fastcompany.com. Archivado desde el original el 5 de mayo de 2017. Consultado el 12 de abril de 2017. 
  • «MIT Conference To Focus On Space Travel For The Public». boston.cbslocal.com. 11 de marzo de 2017. Archivado desde el original el 29 de septiembre de 2017. Consultado el 12 de abril de 2017. 
  • Martin, Gary (25 de enero de 2016). «NewSpace: The "Emerging" Commercial Space Industry». nasa.gov. NASA. Archivado desde el original el 24 de junio de 2016. Consultado el 16 de septiembre de 2016. 
  • «Office of Commercial Space Transportation». faa.gov. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Archivado desde el original el 10 de septiembre de 2016. Consultado el 9 de septiembre de 2016. 
  • Nagendra, Narayan Prasad (28 de febrero de 2017). «Traditional space and new space industry in India». ofronline.org. Archivado desde el original el 12 de marzo de 2017. Consultado el 9 de marzo de 2017. 
  • Pekkanan, Saadia (28 de junio de 2016). «What Does It Take To Compete In NewSpace?». forbes.com. Archivado desde el original el 7 de marzo de 2017. Consultado el 8 de marzo de 2017. 
  • Morring, Jr., Frank (27 de febrero de 2017). «SpaceX Says It Can Beat NASA To Moon». aviatioweek.com. Archivado desde el original el 28 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 28 de febrero de 2017. 
  • Hersher, et al., Rebecca (27 de septiembre de 2016). «Elon Musk Unveils His Plan For Colonizing Mars». npr.org. NPR. Archivado desde el original el 2 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 26 de enero de 2017. 
  • Cordiner, Ralph (1961). «Competitive Private Enterprise in Space». wordpress.com. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. Archivado desde el original el 17 de noviembre de 2016. Consultado el 17 de noviembre de 2016. 
  • Hagerty, James (10 de febrero de 2017). «Harold Rosen Launched an Era of Global Satellite Communications». wsj.com. Archivado desde el original el 21 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 21 de febrero de 2017. «After the Soviet Union launched its Sputnik satellite in 1957, American scientists were under the gun to top that stunning feat. Harold Rosen, an electrical engineer at Hughes Aircraft Co., proposed small, spinning satellites that could relay telephone calls and TV signals around the world.» 
  • «NewSpace 2017: Convergence». Archivado desde el original el 26 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 10 de marzo de 2017. «NewSpace converges every vertical of the space industry together with transformational new partners across sectors. [...] [This] cross-disciplinary collaboration [is] critical to creating a sustainable space economy, which in turn fuels innovation in areas from healthcare to construction.» 
  • Sheraz, Sadiq (18 de noviembre de 2013). «Silicon Valley Goes to Space». kqed.org. Archivado desde el original el 1 de marzo de 2017. Consultado el 28 de febrero de 2017. 
  • «Welcome to Enterprise in Space (EIS) Academy!». eisacademy.org. Archivado desde el original el 20 de octubre de 2016. Consultado el 30 de octubre de 2016. 
  • De La Cruz, Paula (18 de julio de 2014). «A Japanese Artist Launches Plants Into Space». nytimes.com. Archivado desde el original el 20 de noviembre de 2017. Consultado el 15 de marzo de 2017. 
  • Harrison, Todd (26 de julio de 2016). «Commercial Space Needs Regulatory Clarity». breakingdefense.com. Archivado desde el original el 9 de marzo de 2017. Consultado el 8 de marzo de 2017. 

webcitation.org

wsj.com

  • Hagerty, James (10 de febrero de 2017). «Harold Rosen Launched an Era of Global Satellite Communications». wsj.com. Archivado desde el original el 21 de febrero de 2017. Consultado el 21 de febrero de 2017. «After the Soviet Union launched its Sputnik satellite in 1957, American scientists were under the gun to top that stunning feat. Harold Rosen, an electrical engineer at Hughes Aircraft Co., proposed small, spinning satellites that could relay telephone calls and TV signals around the world.» 

xataka.com