«Case concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). Preliminary Objections. Judgment of 13 December 2007». Corte Internacional de Justicia. p. 41 (869), § 120. Consultado el 5 de febrero de 2025. «120. Consequently, after examining the arguments presented by the Parties and the material submitted to it, the Court concludes that the 1928 Treaty and 1930 Protocol did not effect a general delimitation of the maritime boundary between Colombia and Nicaragua. [...]. Since the dispute concerning maritime delimitation has not been settled by the 1928 Treaty and 1930 Protocol within the meaning of Article VI of the Pact of Bogotá, the Court has jurisdiction under Article XXXI of the Pact. Therefore, the Court cannot uphold Colombia's first preliminary objection in so far as it concerns the Court's jurisdiction as regards the question of the maritime delimitation between the Parties.»
«Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar». Naciones Unidas. p. 62. Consultado el 5 de febrero de 2025. «74.4. Cuando exista un acuerdo en vigor entre los Estados interesados, las cuestiones relativas a la delimitación de la zona económica exclusiva se resolverán de conformidad con las disposiciones de ese acuerdo».
