Programación estructurada (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Programación estructurada" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Spanish rank

2doi.org

2^nd place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2archive.org

6^th place

5^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

7^th place

1utexas.edu

916^th place

687^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

79^th place

1purdue.edu

850^th place

553^rd place

1wisc.edu

1,045^th place

1,052^nd place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Spanish: 5^th place)

P. J. Plauger (1993). Programming on Purpose (en inglés). PTR Prentice Hall. p. 20. ISBN 978-013-721-374-0.
Bertrand Meyer (2009). Touch of Class: Learning to Program Well with Objects and Contracts. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 189. ISBN 978-3-540-92144-8.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Spanish: 7^th place)

Clark, Leslie B. Wilson, Robert G.; Robert, Clark (2000). Comparative programming languages (3rd edición). Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley. p. 20. ISBN 9780201710120. Archivado desde el original el 26 de noviembre de 2015. Consultado el 25 de noviembre de 2015.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Spanish: 2^nd place)

dx.doi.org

Edsger Dijkstra (marzo de 1968). «Go To Statement Considered Harmful». Communications of the ACM (PDF|formato= requiere |url= (ayuda)) 11 (3): 147-148. doi:10.1145/362929.362947. «"The unbridled use of the go to statement has as an immediate consequence that it becomes terribly hard to find a meaningful set of coordinates in which to describe the process progress. ... The go to statement as it stands is just too primitive, it is too much an invitation to make a mess of one's program". (El uso desenfrenado de la instrucción go to tiene como consecuencia inmediata que se vuelve terriblemente difícil encontrar un conjunto significativo de coordenadas para describir el progreso del proceso. ... La instrucción go to tal como está es simplemente demasiado primitiva, es una invitación demasiado grande a arruinar el propio programa.)».
Frank Rubin (March 1987). «"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful». Communications of the ACM 30 (3): 195-196. S2CID 6853038. doi:10.1145/214748.315722. Archivado desde el original el 20 de marzo de 2009.

purdue.edu (Global: 850^th place; Spanish: 553^rd place)

ecn.purdue.edu

Frank Rubin (March 1987). «"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful». Communications of the ACM 30 (3): 195-196. S2CID 6853038. doi:10.1145/214748.315722. Archivado desde el original el 20 de marzo de 2009.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; Spanish: 79^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Frank Rubin (March 1987). «"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful». Communications of the ACM 30 (3): 195-196. S2CID 6853038. doi:10.1145/214748.315722. Archivado desde el original el 20 de marzo de 2009.

utexas.edu (Global: 916^th place; Spanish: 687^th place)

cs.utexas.edu

In EWD1308, «What led to "Notes on Structured Programming"». , dated 10 June 2001, Dijkstra writes, "Apparently, IBM did not like the popularity of my text; it stole the term "Structured Programming" and under its auspices Harlan D. Mills trivialized the original concept to the abolishment of the goto statement."

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Spanish: 1^st place)

Clark, Leslie B. Wilson, Robert G.; Robert, Clark (2000). Comparative programming languages (3rd edición). Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley. p. 20. ISBN 9780201710120. Archivado desde el original el 26 de noviembre de 2015. Consultado el 25 de noviembre de 2015.
Frank Rubin (March 1987). «"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful». Communications of the ACM 30 (3): 195-196. S2CID 6853038. doi:10.1145/214748.315722. Archivado desde el original el 20 de marzo de 2009.

wisc.edu (Global: 1,045^th place; Spanish: 1,052^nd place)

research.cs.wisc.edu

Elder, Matt; Jackson, Steve; Liblit, Ben (octubre 2008), Code Sandwiches, Universidad de Wisconsin–Madison, 1647 .

Programación estructurada (Spanish Wikipedia)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Spanish: 5th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Spanish: 7th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Spanish: 2nd place)