Revisión por pares abierta (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Revisión por pares abierta" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Spanish rank

11doi.org

2^nd place

10nih.gov

4^th place

2bmj.com

1,226^th place

1,046^th place

1elsevier.com

610^th place

332^nd place

1biomedcentral.com

2,747^th place

1,053^rd place

1elifesciences.org

low place

7,911^th place

1plos.org

2,112^th place

686^th place

1egu.eu

low place

biomedcentral.com

«What is 'open peer review', as operated by the medical journals in the BMC series?». BioMed Central. Consultado el 31 de julio de 2015.

bmj.com

«Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial». BMJ (en inglés) 341: c5729. November 2010. PMC 2982798. PMID 21081600. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5729.
«Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study». BMJ (en inglés) 349: g4145. July 2014. PMC 4077234. PMID 24986891. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4145.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

«Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview». F1000Research 4: 6. 20 de julio de 2015. PMC 4350441. PMID 25767695. doi:10.12688/f1000research.6005.2.
«Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial». The British Journal of Psychiatry 176 (1): 47-51. January 2000. PMID 10789326. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.1.47.
«Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial». BMJ 318 (7175): 23-7. January 1999. PMC 27670. PMID 9872878. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23.
Decoursey, Thomas (March 1999). «Pros and cons of open peer review». Nature Neuroscience 2 (3): 197-8. PMID 10195206. doi:10.1038/nature04991.
«The ups and downs of peer review». Advances in Physiology Education 31 (2): 145-52. June 2007. PMID 17562902. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006.
Lee, Carole J.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Zhang, Guo; Cronin, Blaise (January 2013). «Bias in peer review». Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1): 2-17. doi:10.1002/asi.22784.
«Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial». BMJ (en inglés) 341: c5729. November 2010. PMC 2982798. PMID 21081600. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5729.
«Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study». BMJ (en inglés) 349: g4145. July 2014. PMC 4077234. PMID 24986891. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4145.
«Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance». JAMA 295 (14): 1675-80. April 2006. PMID 16609089. doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1675.
«Prepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ». BMJ 349 (sep03 13): g5394. September 2014. PMID 25186622. doi:10.1136/bmj.g5394.
«Transparency showcases strength of peer review». Nature 468: 29-31. November 2010. PMID 21048742. doi:10.1038/468029a.

egu.eu

«Online + Open Access Publishing». European Geosciences Union. Consultado el 30 de diciembre de 2019.

elifesciences.org

«Peer review». eLife. Consultado el 30 de diciembre de 2019.

elsevier.com

«What is peer review?». Elsevier. Consultado el 31 de julio de 2015.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

«Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview». F1000Research 4: 6. 20 de julio de 2015. PMC 4350441. PMID 25767695. doi:10.12688/f1000research.6005.2.
«Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial». The British Journal of Psychiatry 176 (1): 47-51. January 2000. PMID 10789326. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.1.47.
«Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial». BMJ 318 (7175): 23-7. January 1999. PMC 27670. PMID 9872878. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23.
Decoursey, Thomas (March 1999). «Pros and cons of open peer review». Nature Neuroscience 2 (3): 197-8. PMID 10195206. doi:10.1038/nature04991.
«The ups and downs of peer review». Advances in Physiology Education 31 (2): 145-52. June 2007. PMID 17562902. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006.
«Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial». BMJ (en inglés) 341: c5729. November 2010. PMC 2982798. PMID 21081600. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5729.
«Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study». BMJ (en inglés) 349: g4145. July 2014. PMC 4077234. PMID 24986891. doi:10.1136/bmj.g4145.
«Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance». JAMA 295 (14): 1675-80. April 2006. PMID 16609089. doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1675.
«Prepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ». BMJ 349 (sep03 13): g5394. September 2014. PMID 25186622. doi:10.1136/bmj.g5394.
«Transparency showcases strength of peer review». Nature 468: 29-31. November 2010. PMID 21048742. doi:10.1038/468029a.

plos.org

blogs.plos.org

«PLOS Journals Now OPEN for Published Peer Review». PLOS. 22 de mayo de 2019. Consultado el 30 de diciembre de 2019.