Sales de Schüssler (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sales de Schüssler" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Spanish rank

2^nd place

4^th place

274^th place

245^th place

6^th place

5^th place

367^th place

1,245^th place

462^nd place

830^th place

archive.org

Tuomela R (1987). «Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience». En Pitt JC, Marcello P, ed. Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 98 (Springer). pp. 83-101. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4.
Smith K (2012). «Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical». Bioethics 26 (9): 508-512. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x.
Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). «Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?». Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century (Springer). pp. 19-57. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. «within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery».
Ernst, E. (2002). «A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy». British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54 (6): 577-82. PMC 1874503. PMID 12492603. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x.
Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005), «Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy», The Lancet 366 (9487): 726-732, PMID 16125589, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2 .

Ernst, E. (2002). «A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy». British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54 (6): 577-82. PMC 1874503. PMID 12492603. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x.
Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005), «Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy», The Lancet 366 (9487): 726-732, PMID 16125589, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2 .

Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy - Science and Technology Committee, British House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 22 de febrero de 2010, consultado el 5 de abril de 2014 .

Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). «Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?». Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century (Springer). pp. 19-57. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. «within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery».