Símbolos planetarios (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Símbolos planetarios" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Spanish rank
18th place
34th place
2nd place
2nd place
6th place
5th place
3rd place
7th place
7,945th place
4,009th place
57th place
3rd place
1,985th place
1,413th place
2,640th place
1,973rd place
504th place
204th place
4th place
4th place
621st place
862nd place
311th place
1,386th place

archive.org

books.google.com

doi.org

dx.doi.org

  • Stearn, William T. (May 1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon 11 (4): 109-113. doi:10.2307/1217734. «The origin of these symbols has long been a matter of interest to scholars. Probably none now accepts the interpretation of Scaliger that ♂ represents the shield and spear of Mars and ♀ Venus's looking-glass. All the evidence favours the conclusion of the French classical scholar Claude de Saumaise (Salmasius, 1588-1653) that these symbols, as also those for Saturn, Mercury and Jupiter, are derived from contractions in Greek script of the Greek names of the planets which are Kronos (Saturn), Zeus (Jupiter), Thouros (Mars), Phosphoros (Venus) and Stilbon (Mercury). As observed by Linnaeus's one-time student Johann Beckmann in his History of Inventions (English transl., 1797), to understand their origin 'we must make ourselves acquainted with the oldest form of these characters which in all probability, like those used in writing, were subjected to many changes before they acquired that form which they have at present'.» 
  • Schott, GD (December 2005). «Sex symbols ancient and modern: their origins and iconography on the pedigree». The BMJ 331 (7531): 1509-10. ISSN 0959-8138. PMC 1322246. PMID 16373733. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1509. 
  • Stearn, William T. (May 1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon 11 (4): 109-113. ISSN 0040-0262. doi:10.2307/1217734. «In his Systema Naturae (Leyden, 1735) he [Linnaeus] used them with their traditional associations for metals. Their first biological use is in the Linnaean dissertation Plantae hybridae xxx sistit J. J. Haartman (1751) where in discussing hybrid plants Linnaeus denoted the supposed female parent species by the sign ♀, the male parent by the sign ♂, the hybrid by ☿: 'matrem signo ♀, patrem ♂ & plantam hybridam ☿ designavero'. In subsequent publications he retained the signs ♀ and ♂ for male and female individuals but discarded ☿ for hybrids; the last are now indicated by the multiplication sign ×. Linnaeus's first general use of the signs of ♀ and ♂ was in his Species Plantarum (1753) written between 1746 and 1752 and surveying concisely the whole plant kingdom as then known. ... In order to save space Linnaeus employed the astronomical symbols of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and the Sun to denote woody, herbaceous perennial, biennial and annual plants respectively [ed.: the orbital periods of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and Earth about the Sun are 29, 12, 2 and 1 year] ... and Mercury, Mars and Venus for the hermaphrodite, male and female conditions ... Later, in his Mantissa Plantarum (1767) and Mantissa Plantarum altera (1771), Linnaeus regularly used ♂, ♀ and ☿ for male, female and hermaphrodite flowers respectively. Their aptness made them easy to remember and their convenience led to their general acceptance in zoology as well as botany. Koelreuter found them especially convenient when recording his experiments in hybridization; as late as 1778 he used the sign ☿ to denote a hybrid plant.» 
  • Pillans, James (1847). «Ueber den Namen des neuen Planeten». Astronomische Nachrichten 25 (26): 389-392. Bibcode:1847AN.....25..389.. doi:10.1002/asna.18470252602. 
  • Schumacher, H. C. (1846). «Name des Neuen Planeten». Astronomische Nachrichten 25: 81-82. Bibcode:1846AN.....25...81L. doi:10.1002/asna.18470250603. 
  • Hind, J. R. (1847). «Second report of proceedings in the Cambridge Observatory relating to the new Planet (Neptune)». Astronomische Nachrichten 25 (21): 309-314. Bibcode:1847AN.....25..309.. doi:10.1002/asna.18470252102. 

google.co.uk

  • Webb, Stephen (2018). «Planet Venus». Clash of Symbols. Cham Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-71349-6. «The symbol for Venus, is associated with several other concepts: it represents the female sex, for example, and the chemical element copper. But why should symbolise Venus or femininity or copper? It's possible the reason could date back as far back as 4000 BC, when Mesopotamian artisans made mirrors from polished copper. If you were to draw a hand mirror even nowadays, you'd probably come up with something similar to ♀, the circle representing the mirror itself and the cross representing the handle. So, the stylised depiction of a hand mirror, could quite plausibly have become the symbol for copper in a time when mirrors were made from metal rather than glass. And since Aphrodite was often depicted admiring her beauty in a mirror, the symbol came to represent femininity – and thence the planet Venus. The story at least seems plausible.» 

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

iapt-taxon.org

  • Stearn, William T. (May 1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon 11 (4): 109-113. doi:10.2307/1217734. «The origin of these symbols has long been a matter of interest to scholars. Probably none now accepts the interpretation of Scaliger that ♂ represents the shield and spear of Mars and ♀ Venus's looking-glass. All the evidence favours the conclusion of the French classical scholar Claude de Saumaise (Salmasius, 1588-1653) that these symbols, as also those for Saturn, Mercury and Jupiter, are derived from contractions in Greek script of the Greek names of the planets which are Kronos (Saturn), Zeus (Jupiter), Thouros (Mars), Phosphoros (Venus) and Stilbon (Mercury). As observed by Linnaeus's one-time student Johann Beckmann in his History of Inventions (English transl., 1797), to understand their origin 'we must make ourselves acquainted with the oldest form of these characters which in all probability, like those used in writing, were subjected to many changes before they acquired that form which they have at present'.» 
  • Stearn, William T. (May 1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon 11 (4): 109-113. ISSN 0040-0262. doi:10.2307/1217734. «In his Systema Naturae (Leyden, 1735) he [Linnaeus] used them with their traditional associations for metals. Their first biological use is in the Linnaean dissertation Plantae hybridae xxx sistit J. J. Haartman (1751) where in discussing hybrid plants Linnaeus denoted the supposed female parent species by the sign ♀, the male parent by the sign ♂, the hybrid by ☿: 'matrem signo ♀, patrem ♂ & plantam hybridam ☿ designavero'. In subsequent publications he retained the signs ♀ and ♂ for male and female individuals but discarded ☿ for hybrids; the last are now indicated by the multiplication sign ×. Linnaeus's first general use of the signs of ♀ and ♂ was in his Species Plantarum (1753) written between 1746 and 1752 and surveying concisely the whole plant kingdom as then known. ... In order to save space Linnaeus employed the astronomical symbols of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and the Sun to denote woody, herbaceous perennial, biennial and annual plants respectively [ed.: the orbital periods of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and Earth about the Sun are 29, 12, 2 and 1 year] ... and Mercury, Mars and Venus for the hermaphrodite, male and female conditions ... Later, in his Mantissa Plantarum (1767) and Mantissa Plantarum altera (1771), Linnaeus regularly used ♂, ♀ and ☿ for male, female and hermaphrodite flowers respectively. Their aptness made them easy to remember and their convenience led to their general acceptance in zoology as well as botany. Koelreuter found them especially convenient when recording his experiments in hybridization; as late as 1778 he used the sign ☿ to denote a hybrid plant.» 

iau.org

issn.org

portal.issn.org

  • Schott, GD (December 2005). «Sex symbols ancient and modern: their origins and iconography on the pedigree». The BMJ 331 (7531): 1509-10. ISSN 0959-8138. PMC 1322246. PMID 16373733. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1509. 
  • Stearn, William T. (May 1962). «The Origin of the Male and Female Symbols of Biology». Taxon 11 (4): 109-113. ISSN 0040-0262. doi:10.2307/1217734. «In his Systema Naturae (Leyden, 1735) he [Linnaeus] used them with their traditional associations for metals. Their first biological use is in the Linnaean dissertation Plantae hybridae xxx sistit J. J. Haartman (1751) where in discussing hybrid plants Linnaeus denoted the supposed female parent species by the sign ♀, the male parent by the sign ♂, the hybrid by ☿: 'matrem signo ♀, patrem ♂ & plantam hybridam ☿ designavero'. In subsequent publications he retained the signs ♀ and ♂ for male and female individuals but discarded ☿ for hybrids; the last are now indicated by the multiplication sign ×. Linnaeus's first general use of the signs of ♀ and ♂ was in his Species Plantarum (1753) written between 1746 and 1752 and surveying concisely the whole plant kingdom as then known. ... In order to save space Linnaeus employed the astronomical symbols of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and the Sun to denote woody, herbaceous perennial, biennial and annual plants respectively [ed.: the orbital periods of Saturn, Jupiter, Mars and Earth about the Sun are 29, 12, 2 and 1 year] ... and Mercury, Mars and Venus for the hermaphrodite, male and female conditions ... Later, in his Mantissa Plantarum (1767) and Mantissa Plantarum altera (1771), Linnaeus regularly used ♂, ♀ and ☿ for male, female and hermaphrodite flowers respectively. Their aptness made them easy to remember and their convenience led to their general acceptance in zoology as well as botany. Koelreuter found them especially convenient when recording his experiments in hybridization; as late as 1778 he used the sign ☿ to denote a hybrid plant.» 

louvre.fr

collections.louvre.fr

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

unicode.org

zenodo.org