Beetamitmekesisus (Estonian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Beetamitmekesisus" in Estonian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Estonian rank

10doi.org

2^nd place

16^th place

3wiley.com

222^nd place

147^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

23^rd place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

books.google.com

James S. Albert; Roberto E. Reis (8. märts 2011). Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press. Lk 308. ISBN 978-0-520-26868-5. {{cite book}}: eiran tundmatut parameetrit |Külastatud= (juhend)

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Tuomisto, H. 2010. A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia 4: 853–860. DOI:10.1007/s00442-010-1812-0
Tuomisto, H. (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33: 2–22. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05880.x
Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J. and Lennon, J. J. (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 367–382. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x
Anderson, M. J. et al. (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters 14, 19–28. DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
Gorelick, R. (2011) Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity. Oecologia 167, 885–888. DOI:10.1007/s00442-011-2124-8
Jurasinski, G. and Koch, M. (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way. Oecologia, 167, 893–902. DOI:10.1007/s00442-011-2126-6
Moreno, C. E: and Rodríguez, P. (2011) Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Back to basics and toward a unifying framework. Oecologia, 167, 889–892. DOI:10.1007/s00442-011-2125-7
Tuomisto, H. (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Yes, if we choose to use it. Oecologia, 167, 903–911. DOI:10.1007/s00442-011-2128-4
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375. DOI:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Veech, J. A. et al. (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos, 99, 3–9. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990101.x

web.archive.org

Chave, J., Chust, G. & C.Thébaud, C. (2007). The importance of phylogenetic structure in biodiversity studies. Scaling Biodiversity (toim Storch, D., Marquet, P. & Brown, J.H.), Institute Editions, Santa Fe, pp. 151–167.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Baselga, A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 134–143
Carvalho, J. C., Cardoso, P., Borges, P. A. V., Schmera, D. and Podani, J. (2012). Measuring fractions of beta diversity and their relationships to nestedness: a theoretical and empirical comparison of novel approaches. Oikos. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20980.x
Graham, C. & Fine, P. (2008). Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space and time. Ecol. Lett., 11, 1265–1277.