انتخاب گروهی (Persian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "انتخاب گروهی" in Persian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Persian rank
2nd place
2nd place
6th place
9th place
234th place
262nd place
5th place
12th place
4th place
5th place
40th place
28th place
18th place
50th place
low place
low place
12th place
34th place
1,844th place
1,848th place
9,925th place
low place
2,911th place
6,120th place
low place
low place
8,502nd place
low place

archive.org

britannica.com

  • Rogers, Kara (2013-08-28). "Natural Selection, Evolution & Adaptation". Encyclopedia Britannica (به انگلیسی). Retrieved 2024-01-11.

christianscholars.com

doi.org

edge.org

essex.ac.uk

repository.essex.ac.uk

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Strassmann, Joan E.; Page, Robert E.; Robinson, Gene E.; Seeley, Thomas D. (March 2011). "Kin selection and eusociality". Nature. 471 (7339): E5–E6. Bibcode:2011Natur.471E...5S. doi:10.1038/nature09833. PMID 21430723. The same points can be made with regard to the evolution of the eusocial insects, which Nowak et al. suggest cannot be explained by inclusive fitness theory. It was already known that haplodiploidy itself may have only a relatively minor bearing on the origin of eusociality, and so Nowak et al. have added nothing new here. Inclusive fitness theory has explained why eusociality has evolved only in monogamous lineages, and why it is correlated with certain ecological conditions, such as extended parental care and defence of a shared resource. Furthermore, inclusive fitness theory has made very successful predictions about behaviour in eusocial insects, explaining a wide range of phenomena.

msu.edu

cogsci.msu.edu

  • «Human groups as adaptive units: toward a permanent consensus» (PDF). دریافت‌شده در ۲۰۲۴-۰۱-۱۰.

nature.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Strassmann, Joan E.; Page, Robert E.; Robinson, Gene E.; Seeley, Thomas D. (March 2011). "Kin selection and eusociality". Nature. 471 (7339): E5–E6. Bibcode:2011Natur.471E...5S. doi:10.1038/nature09833. PMID 21430723. The same points can be made with regard to the evolution of the eusocial insects, which Nowak et al. suggest cannot be explained by inclusive fitness theory. It was already known that haplodiploidy itself may have only a relatively minor bearing on the origin of eusociality, and so Nowak et al. have added nothing new here. Inclusive fitness theory has explained why eusociality has evolved only in monogamous lineages, and why it is correlated with certain ecological conditions, such as extended parental care and defence of a shared resource. Furthermore, inclusive fitness theory has made very successful predictions about behaviour in eusocial insects, explaining a wide range of phenomena.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

prospectmagazine.co.uk

theguardian.com

wbur.org

worldcat.org

  • Nowak, Martin A.; Tarnita, Corina E.; Wilson, Edward O. (August 2010). "The evolution of eusociality". Nature (به انگلیسی). 466 (7310): 1057–1062. doi:10.1038/nature09205. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 3279739.
  • Rubenstein, Dustin R.; Alcock, John (2019). "12. Principles of Social Evolution". Animal behavior (Eleventh ed.). Sunderland, Massachusetts. p. 449. ISBN 978-1-60535-548-1. OCLC 1022077347. there have been numerous attempts since Wynne-Edwards to develop more convincing forms of group selection theory. Indeed, this 'levels of selection' debate over the level of the biological hierarchy at which natural selection acts (individual, group, gene, species, community, and so forth) has generated much debate among behavioral biologists (Okasha 2010). Yet despite generating controversy, these attempts have generally failed to persuade the vast majority of behavioral biologists that Darwin's view of individual selection—even on altruistic traits that provide clear benefits to others—is wrong.