Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

بیسیک (Persian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "بیسیک" in Persian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Persian rank
3web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
3atariarchives.org
low place
low place
1catb.org
3,959th place
6,174th place
1linux-watch.com
low place
low place
1cis-alumni.org
low place
low place
1acm.org
1,185th place
1,084th place
1virginia.edu
1,041st place
2,190th place
1byte.com
low place
low place
1salon.com
456th place
466th place
1microsoft.com
153rd place
587th place

acm.org

  • In a ۱۹۶۸ letter, Dutch computer scientist Edsger W. Dijkstra considered programming languages using GOTO statements for program structuring purposes harmful for the productivity of the programmer as well as the quality of the resulting code («Go To Statement Considered Harmful" بایگانی‌شده در ۳ ژوئیه ۲۰۰۷ توسط Wayback Machine, Communications of the ACM Volume 11, 147-148. 1968). The letter, which contributed the phrase considered harmful to programming jargon, did not mention any particular programming language; instead it states that the overuse of GOTO is damaging and gives technical reasons why this should be so. In a ۱۹۷۵ tongue-in-cheek article, "How do We Tell Truths that Might Hurt", Sigplan Notices Volume 17 No. 5, Dijkstra gives a list of uncomfortable "truths", including his opinion of several programming languages of the time. Although BASIC is one of his targets ("It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration"), it receives no worse treatment in the piece than PL/I, COBOL or APL.

atariarchives.org

byte.com

  • Most Important Companies (به انگلیسی) (Byte Magazine ed.), September, ‎1995, archived from the original on 18 June 2008, retrieved 17 July 2009 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |تاریخ= (help) Retrieved on 2008-06-10.

catb.org

  • The acronym is tied to the name of an unpublished paper by Thomas Kurtz and is not a backronym, as is sometimes suggested in older versions of The Jargon File

cis-alumni.org

linux-watch.com

microsoft.com

support.microsoft.com

salon.com

virginia.edu

cs.virginia.edu

  • In a ۱۹۶۸ letter, Dutch computer scientist Edsger W. Dijkstra considered programming languages using GOTO statements for program structuring purposes harmful for the productivity of the programmer as well as the quality of the resulting code («Go To Statement Considered Harmful" بایگانی‌شده در ۳ ژوئیه ۲۰۰۷ توسط Wayback Machine, Communications of the ACM Volume 11, 147-148. 1968). The letter, which contributed the phrase considered harmful to programming jargon, did not mention any particular programming language; instead it states that the overuse of GOTO is damaging and gives technical reasons why this should be so. In a ۱۹۷۵ tongue-in-cheek article, "How do We Tell Truths that Might Hurt", Sigplan Notices Volume 17 No. 5, Dijkstra gives a list of uncomfortable "truths", including his opinion of several programming languages of the time. Although BASIC is one of his targets ("It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration"), it receives no worse treatment in the piece than PL/I, COBOL or APL.

web.archive.org

  • http://cis-alumni.org/TKurtz.html بایگانی‌شده در ۱۹ اکتبر ۲۰۱۳ توسط Wayback Machine Thomas E. Kurtz - History of Programming Languages
  • In a ۱۹۶۸ letter, Dutch computer scientist Edsger W. Dijkstra considered programming languages using GOTO statements for program structuring purposes harmful for the productivity of the programmer as well as the quality of the resulting code («Go To Statement Considered Harmful" بایگانی‌شده در ۳ ژوئیه ۲۰۰۷ توسط Wayback Machine, Communications of the ACM Volume 11, 147-148. 1968). The letter, which contributed the phrase considered harmful to programming jargon, did not mention any particular programming language; instead it states that the overuse of GOTO is damaging and gives technical reasons why this should be so. In a ۱۹۷۵ tongue-in-cheek article, "How do We Tell Truths that Might Hurt", Sigplan Notices Volume 17 No. 5, Dijkstra gives a list of uncomfortable "truths", including his opinion of several programming languages of the time. Although BASIC is one of his targets ("It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration"), it receives no worse treatment in the piece than PL/I, COBOL or APL.
  • Most Important Companies (به انگلیسی) (Byte Magazine ed.), September, ‎1995, archived from the original on 18 June 2008, retrieved 17 July 2009 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |تاریخ= (help) Retrieved on 2008-06-10.