فهرست پرفروش‌ترین فیلم‌ها (Persian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "فهرست پرفروش‌ترین فیلم‌ها" in Persian language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Persian rank
41st place
24th place
1st place
1st place
1,519th place
2,294th place
3rd place
5th place
6th place
4th place
9,442nd place
2,442nd place
422nd place
395th place
224th place
77th place
21st place
30th place
67th place
208th place
low place
low place
686th place
1,037th place
945th place
457th place
30th place
40th place
5,391st place
6,510th place
19th place
23rd place
low place
3,734th place
low place
low place
84th place
85th place
492nd place
837th place
331st place
222nd place
11th place
9th place
1,968th place
1,101st place
32nd place
65th place
118th place
149th place
2,951st place
1,617th place
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
7th place
15th place
29th place
25th place
15th place
low place
5,840th place
319th place
599th place
3,470th place
5,025th place
846th place
1,106th place
low place
low place
59th place
97th place
371st place
311th place
7th place
13th place

ap.org (Global: 1,968th place; Persian: 1,101st place)

bigstory.ap.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Persian: 4th place)

archives.gov (Global: 319th place; Persian: 599th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; Persian: 9th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

bloomberg.com (Global: 118th place; Persian: 149th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Persian: 5th place)

boxoffice.com (Global: 9,442nd place; Persian: 2,442nd place)

pro.boxoffice.com

boxofficemojo.com (Global: 41st place; Persian: 24th place)

businessweek.com (Global: 945th place; Persian: 457th place)

caixinglobal.com (Global: low place; Persian: low place)

cinemaweb.com (Global: low place; Persian: low place)

deadline.com (Global: 19th place; Persian: 23rd place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Persian: 2nd place)

economist.com (Global: 331st place; Persian: 222nd place)

entgroup.cn (Global: low place; Persian: 3,734th place)

english.entgroup.cn

ew.com (Global: 59th place; Persian: 97th place)

filmsite.org (Global: 2,951st place; Persian: 1,617th place)

focusfeatures.com (Global: low place; Persian: 5,840th place)

google.co.uk (Global: 1,519th place; Persian: 2,294th place)

books.google.co.uk

  • Vogel, Harold L. (2010). Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis. Cambridge University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-1-107-00309-5. Most pictures would likely receive 20% to 25% of theatrical box office gross for two prime-time network runs.
  • Lang, Robert, ed. (1994). -9780813520278/page/30 The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director. Rutgers University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-8135-2027-8. The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long. {{cite book}}: مقدار |url= را بررسی کنید (کمک)
  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 53 . "The Four Forsemen of the Apocalypse was to become Metro's most expensive production and one of the decade's biggest box-office hits. Its production costs have been estimated at "something between $600,000 and $800,000." Variety estimated its worldwide gross at $4 million in 1925 and at $5 million in 1944; in 1991, it estimated its cumulative domestic rentals at $3,800,000."
  • Brownlow, Kevin (1968). The parade's gone by . انتشارات دانشگاه کالیفرنیا. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-520-03068-8. The negative cost was about $986,000, which did not include Fairbanks' own salary. Once the exploitation and release prints were taken into account, Robin Hood cost about $1,400,000—exceeding both Intolerance ($700,000) and the celebrated "million dollar movie" Foolish Wives. But it earned $2,500,000.
  • Robertson, Patrick (1991). Guinness Book of Movie Facts and Feats (4 ed.). Abbeville Publishing Group. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-55859-236-0. The top grossing silent film was King Vidor's The Big Parade (US 25), with worldwide rentals of $22 million.
  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ pp. 58–59 . "Even then, at a time when the budget for a feature averaged at around $300,000, no more than $382,000 was spent on production...According to the Eddie Mannix Ledger at MGM, it grossed $4,990,000 domestically and $1,141,000 abroad."
  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 163. "MGM's silent Ben-Hur, which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9, 386, 000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of The Birth of a Nation, the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3, 967, 000, it was also the most expensive.)"
  • Finler 2003‌ p. 188 . "At a cost of $2 million Wings was the studio's most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit."
  • The Jazz Singer and The Singing Fool
    • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), The Jazz Singer, p. 113, The film brought in $2.6 million in worldwide rentals and made a net profit of $1,196,750. Jolson's follow-up Warner Bros. film, The Singing Fool (1928), brought in over two times as much, with $5.9 in worldwide rentals and a profit of $3,649,000, making them two of the most profitable films in the 1920s.
    • Crafton, Donald (1999). The Talkies: American Cinema's Transition to Sound, 1926–1931. انتشارات دانشگاه کالیفرنیا. pp. 549–552. ISBN 978-0-520-22128-4. The Singing Fool: Negative Cost ($1000s): 388
    • Birchard, Robert S. (2010), The Broadway Melody, p. 121, It earned $4.4 million in worldwide rentals and was the first movie to spawn sequels (there were several until 1940). In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
    • Bradley, Edwin M. (2004) [1st. pub. 1996]. The First Hollywood Musicals: A Critical Filmography of 171 Features, 1927 Through 1932. McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-0-7864-2029-2.
      • The Singing Fool: p. 12. "Ego aside, Jolson was at the top of his powers in The Singing Fool. The $150,000 Warner Bros. paid him to make it, and the $388,000 it took to produce the film, were drops in the hat next to the film's world gross of $5.9 million. Its 
      • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 46 . "Production Cost: $0.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
      • Cormack, Mike (1993). Ideology and Cinematography in Hollywood, 1930–1939. پالگریو مک‌میلان. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-312-10067-4. Although costing $1250000—a huge sum for any studio in 1929—the film was a financial success. Karl Thiede gives the domestic box-office at $1500000, and the same figure for the foreign gross.
      • Balio, Tino (1996). Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930–1939. Vol. 5 of History of the American Cinema. انتشارات دانشگاه کالیفرنیا. ISBN 978-0-520-20334-1.
        • Cavalcade: p. 182. "Produced by Winfield Sheehan at a cost of $1.25 million, Cavalcade won Academy Awards for best picture, director, art direction and grossed close to $4 
        • Hell's Angels
          • Balio, Tino (1976). United Artists: The Company Built by the Stars. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 110. Hughes did not have the "Midas touch" the trade press so often attributed to him. Variety, for example, reported that Hell's Angels cost $3.2 million to make, and by July, 1931, eight months after its release, the production cost had nearly been paid off. Keats claimed the picture cost $4 million to make and that it earned twice that much within twenty years. The production cost estimate is probably correct. Hughes worked on the picture for over two years, shooting it first as a silent and then as a talkie. Lewis Milestone said that in between Hughes experimented with shooting it in color as well. But Variety's earnings report must be the fabrication of a delirious publicity agent, and Keats' the working of a myth maker. During the seven years it was in United Artists distribution, Hell's Angels grossed $1.6 million in the domestic market, of which Hughes' share was $1.2 million. Whatever the foreign gross was, it seems unlikely that it was great enough to earn a profit for the picture.
          • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 163 . "It drew $1.4 million in worldwide rentals in its first run versus $1.2 million for Dracula, which had opened in February 1931."
          • Sedgwick, John (2000). Popular Filmgoing In 1930s Britain: A Choice of Pleasures. University of Exeter Press. pp. 146–148. ISBN 978-0-85989-660-3. Sources: Eddie Mannix Ledger, made available to the author by Mark Glancy...
          • Finler 2003‌ p. 188 . "The studio released its most profitable pictures of the decade in 1933, She Done Him Wrong and I'm No Angel, written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history..."
          • Block, Alex Ben (2010), She Done Him Wrong, p. 173, The worldwide rentals of over $3 million keep the lights on at Paramount, which did not shy away from selling the movie's sex appeal. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
          • Phillips, Kendall R. (2008). Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America. ABC-CLIO. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-56720-724-8. The reaction to West's first major film, however, was not exclusively negative. Made for a mere $200,000, the film would rake in a healthy $2 million in the United States and an additional million in overseas markets.
          • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 135 . "Total production cost: $274,076 (Unadjusted $s)."
          • Dick, Bernard F. (2008). Claudette Colbert: She Walked in Beauty. انتشارات دانشگاهی میسیسیپی. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-60473-087-6. Although Columbia's president, Harry Cohn, had strong reservations about It Happened One Night, he also knew that it would not bankrupt the studio; the rights were only $5,000, and the budget was set at $325,000, including the performers' salaries.
          • Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
            • Monaco, Paul (2010). A History of American Movies: A Film-By-Film Look at the Art, Craft, and Business of Cinema. رومن و لیتلفیلد. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-8108-7434-3. Considered a highly risky gamble when the movie was in production in the mid-1930s, by the fiftieth anniversary of its 1937 premiere Snow White's earnings exceeded $330 million.
            • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 283 ."The final negative cost of Gone with the Wind (GWTW) has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million."
            • Barrier, Michael (2003). Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age. New York: انتشارات دانشگاه آکسفورد. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-19-983922-3. The film's negative cost was $2.6 million, more than $1 million higher than Snow White's.
            • Schatz, Thomas (1999) [1st. pub. 1997]. Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s. Vol. 6 of History of the American Cinema. انتشارات دانشگاه کالیفرنیا. p. 466. ISBN 978-0-520-22130-7. Boom Town ($4.6 million).
            • Block & Wilson 2010‌ pp. 258259 . "Production Cost: $2.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) … Boom Town was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade."
            • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 267 . "With worldwide rentals of $7.8 million in its initial release, the movie made a net profit of over $3 million."
            • Finler 2003‌ p. 301 . "The studio did particularly well with its war-related pictures, such as Sergeant York (1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio's biggest hit of the decade aside from This is the Army (1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund."
            • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 281 . "Worldwide rentals of $3,449,353 barely recouped the film's nearly $2 million production cost."
            • Glancy, Mark (1999). When Hollywood Loved Britain: The Hollywood 'British' Film 1939–1945. انتشارات دانشگاه منچستر. pp. 9495. ISBN 978-0-7190-4853-1. Mrs Miniver was a phenomenon. It was the most popular film of the year (from any studio) in both North America and Britain, and its foreign earnings were three times higher than those of any other MGM film released in the 1941–42 season. The production cost ($1,344,000) was one of the highest of the season, indicating the studio never thought of the film as a potential loss-maker. When the film earned a worldwide gross of $8,878,000, MGM had the highest profit ($4,831,000) in its history. Random Harvest nearly matched the success of Mrs Miniver with worldwide earnings of $8,147,000 yielding the second-highest profit in MGM's history ($4,384,000). Random Harvest was also the most popular film of the year in Britain, where it proved to be even more popular than Britain's most acclaimed war film, In Which We Serve.
            • Block & Wilson 2010
              • Mrs. Miniver: Burns, Douglas (2010), Mrs. Miniver, p. 279, Mrs. Miniver's galvanizing effect on Americans spawned a record-breaking ten-week run at Radio City Music Hall and garnered a $5.4 million take in domestic rentals (making Mrs. Miniver 1942's top grosser), with a $4.8 million profit on worldwide rentals of $8.9 million.
              • McAdams, Frank (2010), For Whom the Bell Tolls, p. 287, Despite the early furor over the novel being "pro-red and immoral," the film opened to strong and favorable reviews and brought in $11 million in worldwide rentals in its initial release. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
              • Finler 2003‌ pp. 356–363
              • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 420 . "(Unadjusted $s) in Millions of $s – Production Cost: $1.0"
              • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 232
              • Schaefer, Eric (1999). "Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!": A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959. انتشارات دانشگاه دوک. pp. 197–199. ISBN 978-0-8223-2374-7. Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was Mom and Dad (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the Los Angeles Times reported that Mom and Dad had grossed $2 million. By 1949 Time had estimated that Mom and Dad had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from Mom and Dad's production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975...The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William "One Shot" Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.
              • Gabler, Neal (2007). Walt Disney: the biography. گروه کوارتو. pp. 438. Still, the film wound up grossing $3.3 million...
              • Hall & Neale 2010
                • p. 132."Best Years was considerably cheaper, costing only $2.1 
                • Burns, Douglas (2010), The Best years of Our Lives, p. 301, The film made a $5 million profit on worldwide rentals of $14.8 million. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 285 (note 6.56) . "The cost of Duel in the Sun has been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver, David O'Selznick's Hollywood, 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson, Showman: The Life of David O'Selznick, 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses. Forever Amber cost $6,375,000 (Solomon, Twentieth Century-Fox: A Corporate and Financial History, 243)."
                • Chopra-Gant, Mike (2006). Hollywood Genres and Post-war America: Masculinity, Family and Nation in Popular Movies and Film Noir. آی بی توریس. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-85043-815-1. Forever Amber: $8 million; Unconquered: $7.5 million; Life with Father: $6.25 million
                • Street, Sarah (2002). Transatlantic Crossings: British Feature Films in the United States. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-8264-1395-6. Although both films had higher than average budgets (The Red Shoes cost £505,581 and Hamlet cost £572,530, while the average cost of the other thirty films for which Rank supplied information was £233,000), they resulted in high takings at home and abroad.
                • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 136–139
                • Eisner, Michael D.; Schwartz, Tony (2009). Work in Progress. دانشگاه ایالتی پنسیلوانیا. p. 178. ISBN 978-0-7868-8507-7. Cinderella revived its fortunes. Re-released in February 1950, it cost nearly $3 million to make but earned more than $20 million worldwide.
                • Barrier, Michael (2003). Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age. انتشارات دانشگاه آکسفورد. p. 401. ISBN 978-0-19-516729-0. It cost around $2.2 million, little more than each of the two package features, Melody Time and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (as Tluo Fabulous Characters had ultimately been named), that just preceded it, but its gross rentals—an amount shared by Disney and RKO—were $7.8 million, almost twice as much as the two package features combined.
                • Lev, Peter (2006). Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959. Vol. 7 of History of the American Cinema. انتشارات دانشگاه کالیفرنیا. ISBN 978-0-520-24966-0.
                  • Quo Vadis: p. 15. "MGM's most expensive film of the period, Quo Vadis (1951) also did extremely well. The cost was $7,623,000, earnings were an estimated $21.2 
                  • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 335
                  • Zone, Ray (2012). 3-D Revolution: The History of Modern Stereoscopic Cinema. University Press of Kentucky. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-8131-3611-0. Produced at a cost of $1 million, This is Cinerama ran 122 weeks, earning $4.7 million in its initial New York run alone and eventually grossed over $32 million. It was obvious to Hollywood that the public was ready for a new form of motion picture entertainment. The first five Cinerama feature-length travelogues, though they only played in twenty-two theaters, pulled in a combined gross of $82 million.
                  • Burns, Douglas (2010), The Greatest Show on Earth, pp. 354–355, By May 1953, Variety was reporting that the Best Picture winner had amassed $18.35 million in worldwide rentals. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 147148 . "To take full advantage of CinemaScope's panoramic possibilities, shooting was delayed for the sets to be redesigned and rebuilt, adding $500,000 to the eventual $4.1 million budget...It ultimately returned domestic rentals of $17.5 million and $25 million worldwide, placing it second only to Gone with the Wind in Variety's annually updated chart."
                  • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 367 . "It brought in $16.7 million in domestic rentals, $9.4 million in foreign rentals, and made a net profit of $8.1 million."
                  • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 420 . "Domestic Box Office: $19.6 million; Production Cost: $3.8 million."
                  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 149 . "VistaVision was first used for the musical White Christmas (1954), which Variety named the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million."
                  • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 327 . "Production cost: $13.3 million; Domestic Film Rental: $31.3; Foreign Film Rental: $23.9; Worldwide Box office (estimated): $122.7 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
                  • Hall & Neale 2010‌ pp. 159–161
                    • The Ten Commandments: "No film did more to entrench roadshow policy than The Ten Commandments. While the success of This Is Cinerama, The Robe, and even Eighty Days could be attributed, at least in part, to their respective photographic and projection formats, that of DeMille's film (which cost a record $13,266,491) could not...General release began at normal prices in 1959 and continued until the end of the following year, when the film was temporarily withdrawn (the first of several reissues came in 1966). The worldwide rental by this time was around $60 
                    • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 153 . "South Pacific also became for a time the most successful film ever released in the United Kingdom, where it earned a box-office gross three times its negative cost of $5,610,000. Anticipated global rentals after three years were $30 million."
                    • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 324 . "Worldwide box office: $146.9 million; Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million; Production cost: $15.9 million. (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)"
                    • Reid, John Howard (2006). America's Best, Britain's Finest: A Survey of Mixed Movies. Vol. 14 of Hollywood classics. Lulu. p. 243–245. ISBN 978-1-4116-7877-4. Negative cost: around $4 million; Worldwide film rentals gross (including 1968 American reissue) to 1970: $30 million.
                    • Webster, Patrick (2010). Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut. McFarland & Company. pp. 298 (note 2.23). ISBN 978-0-7864-5916-2. Spartacus cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.
                    • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 179
                    • Block, Hayley Taylor (2010), West Side Story, p. 449, With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars). In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                    • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 434
                    • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 165166
                      • Lawrence of Arabia: Columbia released the $13.8 million Lawrence of Arabia (1962), filmed in Super Panavision 70, exclusively on a hard-ticket basis, but opened Barabbas (1962), The Cardinal (1963), and the $12 million Joseph Conrad adaptation Lord Jim (1965) as 70 
                      • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 164 . "West cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability."
                      • Block & Wilson 2010‌ pp. 428–429
                      • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 184
                        • My Fair Lady: "My Fair Lady (1964) cost Warners $17 million to make, including a record $5.5 million just for the film rights to the Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe stage show and a million-dollar fee for star Audrey Hepburn. By 1967 it was reported to have grossed $55 
                        • Burns, Douglas (2010), Mary Poppins, p. 469, In its initial run, Poppins garnered an astounding $44 million in worldwide rentals and became the company's first Best Picture Oscar contender. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                        • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 188 . "The negative cost of Warners' adaptation of Edward Albee's play Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget)."
                        • Denisoff, R. Serge; Romanowski, William D. (1991). Risky Business: Rock in Film. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-88738-843-9.
                          • The Graduate: p. 167. "World net rental was estimated at more than $85 
                          • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 191–192
                            • The Graduate: "The Graduate eventually earned U.S. rentals of $44,090,729 on a production cost of $3.1 
                            • Welles, Chris (September 7, 1970). "Behind the Silence at Columbia Pictures—No Moguls, No Minions, Just Profits". [[نیویورک (مجله)|]]. Vol. 3, no. 36. New York Media. pp. 42–47. While Columbia, battling Ray Stark over every dollar, did Funny Girl for around $8.8 million, a million or so over budget, Fox spent nearly $24 million on Hello, Dolly!, more than twice the initial budget, and the film will thus have to gross three times as much to break even.
                            • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 527
                            • The Godfather
                              • 1974: Newsweek. Vol. 84. 1974. p. 74. The original Godfather has grossed a mind-boggling $285 million...
                              • Jacobs, Diane (1980). Hollywood Renaissance. انتشارات دل. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-440-53382-5. The Godfather catapulted Coppola to overnight celebrity, earning three Academy Awards and a then record-breaking $142 million in worldwide sales.
                              • Stanley, Robert Henry; Steinberg, Charles Side (1976). The media environment: mass communications in American society. Hastings House. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-8038-4681-4. ...further reflected by the phenomenal successes of The Sting, Chinatown and The Exorcist. The latter film, which cost about $10 million to produce, has grossed over $110 million worldwide.
                              • New York, vol. 8, New York Media, 1975, ...Jaws should outstrip another MCA hit, The Sting, which had world-wide revenues of $115 million. (Online copy at گوگل بوکز) {{یادکرد}}: پیوند خارجی در |quote= وجود دارد (کمک)
                              • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 560 . "Production Cost: $5.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
                              • Hall & Neale 2010‌ pp. 206–208 . "The most successful entry in the disaster cycle was the $15 million The Towering Inferno which earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign."
                              • Priggé, Steven (2004). Movie Moguls Speak: Interviews With Top Film Producers. McFarland & Company. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-7864-1929-6. The budget for the first Jaws was $4 million and the picture wound up costing $9 million.
                              • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 214 . "Rocky was the "sleeper of the decade". Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide."
                              • Block, Alex Ben (2010), Rocky, p. 583, The budget was $1,075,000 plus producer's fees of $100,000. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                              • Hall & Neale 2010‌ p. 218 . "Eventually costing $11,293,151, Star Wars was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977."
                              • Hofler, Robert (2010). Party Animals: A Hollywood Tale of Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'N' Roll Starring the Fabulous Allan Carr. ReadHowYouWant.com. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-4596-0007-2. Despite the fact that Grease was well on its way to becoming the highest-grossing movie musical in the world, and eventually grossed over $341 million...
                              • McAdams, Frank (2010), Top Gun, pp. 678–679, Production Cost: $19.0 (Millions of $s) … Despite mixed reviews, it played in the top 10 for an extended period and was a huge hit, grossing almost $345 million in worldwide box office. In: Block & Wilson 2010 .
                              • Block & Wilson 2010‌ pp. 694–695 . "Production Cost: $55.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) … The film went on to haul in over $494 million worldwide."
                              • Block & Wilson 2010‌ p. 509 . "Production Cost: $140.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."

hollywoodreporter.com (Global: 30th place; Persian: 40th place)

latimes.com (Global: 32nd place; Persian: 65th place)

articles.latimes.com

measuringworth.com (Global: 3,470th place; Persian: 5,025th place)

news.google.com (Global: 67th place; Persian: 208th place)

  • Coons, Robin (June 30, 1939). "Hollywood Chatter". The Daytona Beach News-Journal. p. 6.
  • Mulligan, Hugh A. (September 23, 1956). "Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker". The Register-Guard. Eugene, Oregon. p. 7B.
  • Minego, Pete (May 21, 1956). "Pete's Pungent Patter". Portsmouth Daily Times. Portsmouth, Ohio. p. 19.
  • "Animals Portray Parts in Disney's "Robin Hood"". Toledo Blade. October 18, 1970. Sec. G, p. 7. "The Jungle Book," in it's [کذا] initial world-wide release, has grossed $23.8 million to date...

newsbank.com (Global: 492nd place; Persian: 837th place)

nl.newsbank.com

newsweek.com (Global: 371st place; Persian: 311th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Persian: 13th place)

pqarchiver.com (Global: 846th place; Persian: 1,106th place)

pqasb.pqarchiver.com

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; Persian: 29th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

tcm.com (Global: 422nd place; Persian: 395th place)

the-numbers.com (Global: 224th place; Persian: 77th place)

thefreelibrary.com (Global: 686th place; Persian: 1,037th place)

time.com (Global: 84th place; Persian: 85th place)

turner.com (Global: 5,391st place; Persian: 6,510th place)

tcm.turner.com

variety.com (Global: 21st place; Persian: 30th place)

varietyultimate.com (Global: low place; Persian: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Persian: 1st place)

webcitation.org (Global: 25th place; Persian: 15th place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Persian: 7th place)

search.worldcat.org