نظریه اعداد (Persian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "نظریه اعداد" in Persian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Persian rank

6^th place

9^th place

1^st place

2^nd place

670^th place

767^th place

451^st place

931^st place

70^th place

178^th place

3^rd place

6^th place

ams.org

Take, for example, (Serre 1973). In 1952, Davenport still had to specify that he meant The Higher Arithmetic. Hardy and Wright wrote in the introduction to An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (1938): "We proposed at one time to change [the title] to An introduction to arithmetic, a more novel and in some ways a more appropriate title; but it was pointed out that this might lead to misunderstandings about the content of the book." (Hardy & Wright 2008) Hardy, Godfrey Harold; Wright, E.M. (2008) [1938]. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (Sixth ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-921986-5. MR 2445243.

Already in 1921, T. L. Heath had to explain: "By arithmetic, Plato meant, not arithmetic in our sense, but the science which considers numbers in themselves, in other words, what we mean by the Theory of Numbers." (Heath 1921, p. 13) Heath, Thomas L. (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics, Volume 1: From Thales to Euclid. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Retrieved 2016-02-28.
Long 1972, p. 1. Long, Calvin T. (1972). Elementary Introduction to Number Theory (2nd ed.). Lexington, VA: D.C. Heath and Company. LCCN 77171950.

Neugebauer (Neugebauer 1969, pp. 36–40) discusses the table in detail and mentions in passing Euclid's method in modern notation (Neugebauer 1969, p. 39). Neugebauer, Otto E. (1969). The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (corrected reprint of the 1957 ed.). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-22332-2. Retrieved 2016-03-02. Neugebauer, Otto E. (1969). The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (corrected reprint of the 1957 ed.). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-22332-2. Retrieved 2016-03-02.

(Neugebauer & Sachs 1945، ص. 40). The term takiltum is problematic. Robson prefers the rendering "The holding-square of the diagonal from which 1 is torn out, so that the short side comes up...".(Robson 2001، ص. 192) Neugebauer, Otto E.; Sachs, Abraham Joseph; Götze, Albrecht (1945). Mathematical Cuneiform Texts. American Oriental Series. Vol. 29. American Oriental Society etc. Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21.
(Robson 2001، ص. 189). Other sources give the modern formula $(p^{2}-q^{2},2pq,p^{2}+q^{2})$ . Van der Waerden gives both the modern formula and what amounts to the form preferred by Robson.(van der Waerden 1961, p. 79) Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21. van der Waerden, Bartel L.; Dresden, Arnold (trans) (1961). Science Awakening. Vol. Vol. 1 or Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)

(Neugebauer & Sachs 1945، ص. 40). The term takiltum is problematic. Robson prefers the rendering "The holding-square of the diagonal from which 1 is torn out, so that the short side comes up...".(Robson 2001، ص. 192) Neugebauer, Otto E.; Sachs, Abraham Joseph; Götze, Albrecht (1945). Mathematical Cuneiform Texts. American Oriental Series. Vol. 29. American Oriental Society etc. Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21.
(Robson 2001، ص. 189). Other sources give the modern formula $(p^{2}-q^{2},2pq,p^{2}+q^{2})$ . Van der Waerden gives both the modern formula and what amounts to the form preferred by Robson.(van der Waerden 1961, p. 79) Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21. van der Waerden, Bartel L.; Dresden, Arnold (trans) (1961). Science Awakening. Vol. Vol. 1 or Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)

(Neugebauer & Sachs 1945، ص. 40). The term takiltum is problematic. Robson prefers the rendering "The holding-square of the diagonal from which 1 is torn out, so that the short side comes up...".(Robson 2001، ص. 192) Neugebauer, Otto E.; Sachs, Abraham Joseph; Götze, Albrecht (1945). Mathematical Cuneiform Texts. American Oriental Series. Vol. 29. American Oriental Society etc. Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21.
(Robson 2001، ص. 189). Other sources give the modern formula $(p^{2}-q^{2},2pq,p^{2}+q^{2})$ . Van der Waerden gives both the modern formula and what amounts to the form preferred by Robson.(van der Waerden 1961, p. 79) Robson, Eleanor (2001). "Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: a Reassessment of Plimpton 322" (PDF). Historia Mathematica. 28 (3): 167–206. doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2317. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-21. van der Waerden, Bartel L.; Dresden, Arnold (trans) (1961). Science Awakening. Vol. Vol. 1 or Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)