پیچیدگی تجزیه‌ناپذیر (Persian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "پیچیدگی تجزیه‌ناپذیر" in Persian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Persian rank

4^th place

5^th place

2^nd place

2^nd place

18^th place

50^th place

117^th place

162^nd place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

1texscience.org

low place

low place

234^th place

262^nd place

1biomedcentral.com

2,747^th place

2,365^th place

biomedcentral.com

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/341

doi.org

"Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design". Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2007-07-24. Perakh M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent — Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713 Mark D. Decker. College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy بایگانی‌شده در ۳۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۰ توسط Wayback Machine See also list of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design
Scott EC, Matzke NJ (May 2007). "Biological design in science classrooms". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104 (suppl_1): 8669–76, See page 8672. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104. PMC 1876445. PMID 17494747.

harvard.edu

hcs.harvard.edu

"Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design". Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2007-07-24. Perakh M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent — Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713 Mark D. Decker. College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy بایگانی‌شده در ۳۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۰ توسط Wayback Machine See also list of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Scott EC, Matzke NJ (May 2007). "Biological design in science classrooms". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104 (suppl_1): 8669–76, See page 8672. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104. PMC 1876445. PMID 17494747.

msn.com

msnbc.msn.com

Ker Than (September 23, 2005). "Why scientists dismiss 'intelligent design' - LiveScience". msnbc.com. Retrieved 2010-05-17.

nature.com

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.htm

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design". Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2007-07-24. Perakh M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent — Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713 Mark D. Decker. College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy بایگانی‌شده در ۳۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۰ توسط Wayback Machine See also list of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design
Scott EC, Matzke NJ (May 2007). "Biological design in science classrooms". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104 (suppl_1): 8669–76, See page 8672. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8669S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701505104. PMC 1876445. PMID 17494747.

texscience.org

"Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design". Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2007-07-24. Perakh M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent — Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713 Mark D. Decker. College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy بایگانی‌شده در ۳۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۰ توسط Wayback Machine See also list of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design

web.archive.org

"Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design". Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2007-07-24. Perakh M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent — Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713 Mark D. Decker. College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy بایگانی‌شده در ۳۰ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۰ توسط Wayback Machine See also list of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design