According to the The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition (2000): It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun. "Jew"بایگانیشده در ۲۱ آوریل ۲۰۰۸ توسط Wayback Machine, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition (2000).
According to the The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition (2000): It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun. "Jew"بایگانیشده در ۲۱ آوریل ۲۰۰۸ توسط Wayback Machine, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition (2000).
