Capitalisme de connivence (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Capitalisme de connivence" in French language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank French rank
254th place
519th place
6,842nd place
448th place
low place
low place
7th place
28th place
70th place
196th place
228th place
675th place
231st place
393rd place
362nd place
1,300th place
2,302nd place
4,499th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

cis.org.au

conferenceboard.ca

cpim.org

pd.cpim.org

economist.com

  • (en) « The countries where politically connected businessmen are most likely to prosper », The Economist,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )
  • (en) « Peronism and its perils », The Economist,‎ (lire en ligne)
  • (en) « Having it both ways », The Economist,‎ (lire en ligne)
  • (en) « Planet Plutocrat: The countries where politically connected businessmen are most likely to prosper », The Economist,‎ (lire en ligne)

europeaninterest.eu

levif.be

loc.gov

catdir.loc.gov

  • (en) David C., Crony Capitalism : Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, , 203 p. (ISBN 978-0-521-00408-4, lire en ligne)

    « Focused only on explaining successful outcomes, the conventional model provided no analytic way to explain the 1997 crisis. Countries previously regarded as miracles now were nothing more than havens for crony capitalists (p.3) »

lowyinstitute.org

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

nytimes.com

scmp.com

  • (en) Stephen Vines, « Why Hong Kong’s latest No 1 ranking was greeted with silence », South China Morning Post,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )

theatlantic.com

  • (en) « Uber vs. Washington, D.C.: This Is Insane », (consulté le ) : « a fight over a new competitor to the District's (often horrible) taxi service offers something I haven't seen in a while. Not routine retail-level corruption, nor skillful top-level favor trading, but instead what appears to be a blatant attempt to legislate favors for one set of interests by hamstringing another. »

worldbank.org

www-wds.worldbank.org