Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Charles Sanders Peirce (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Charles Sanders Peirce" in French language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank French rank
8cspeirce.com
low place
low place
8helsinki.fi
1,670th place
2,811th place
4web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
4wikiwix.com
194th place
17th place
4archive.is
87th place
20th place
4googleusercontent.com
243rd place
21st place
4books.google.com
3rd place
11th place
3stanford.edu
179th place
385th place
3iupui.edu
9,528th place
low place
3wikipedia.org
low place
low place
3textlog.de
low place
low place
1worldcat.org
5th place
13th place
1uqam.ca
8,657th place
886th place
1aip.org
2,204th place
2,604th place
1ingentaconnect.com
3,306th place
2,270th place
1unicamp.br
4,854th place
low place
1princeton.edu
741st place
1,215th place
1gvsu.edu
low place
low place
1archive.org
6th place
63rd place
1ac-grenoble.fr
low place
1,793rd place
1persee.fr
515th place
37th place
1doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
1arxiv.org
69th place
232nd place

ac-grenoble.fr

aip.org

ptonline.aip.org

archive.is

archive.org

  • "That the rule of induction will hold good in the long run may be deduced from the principle that reality is only the object of the final opinion to which sufficient investigation would lead", in Peirce (1878 April), "The Probability of Induction", p. 718 (via Internet Archive) in Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, pp. 705–18. Reprinted in CP 2.669–93, W 3:290–305, EP 1:155–69, elsewhere.

arxiv.org

books.google.com

  • The ground blackness is the pure abstraction of the quality black which in turn amounts to—which embodies blackness. The quality amounts to reference to its own pure abstraction, the ground. The question is not merely of noun (the ground) versus adjective (the quality), but rather of whether we are considering the black(ness) as abstracted away from application to an object, or instead as so applied (for instance to a stove). Yet note that Peirce's distinction here is not that between a property-general and a property-individual (a trope). See "On a New List of Categories" (1867), in the section appearing in CP 1.551. Regarding the ground, cf. the Scholastic conception of a relation's foundation, Google limited preview Deely 1982, p. 61
  • A quale in this sense is a such, just as a quality is a suchness. Cf. under "Use of Letters" in §3 of Peirce's "Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives", Memoirs of the American Academy, v. 9, pp. 317–78 (1870), separately reprinted (1870), from which see p. 6 via Google books, also reprinted in CP 3.63:

    « Now logical terms are of three grand classes. The first embraces those whose logical form (en) involves only the conception of quality, and which therefore represent a thing simply as “a —.” These discriminate objects in the most rudimentary way, which does not involve any consciousness of discrimination. They regard an object as it is in itself as such (quale); for example, as horse, tree, or man. These are absolute terms. (Peirce, 1870. But also see "Quale-Consciousness", 1898, in CP 6.222–37.) »

  • Peirce (1905), "Issues of Pragmaticism", The Monist, v. XV, no 4, pp. 481-99. Reprinted CP 5.438-63. Also important: CP 5.497-525.
  • Peirce, "Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic: Further Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy v. II, n. 4, pp. 193-208. Reprinted CP 5.318-357, W 2:242-272 (PEP Eprint), EP 1:56-82.

cspeirce.com

  • (en) Irving H. (1995) « Peirce Rustled, Russell Pierced: How Charles Peirce and Bertrand Russell Viewed Each Other's Work in Logic, and an Assessment of Russell's Accuracy and Role in the Historiography of Logic » Modern Logic 5, 270–328. Arisbe Eprint.
  • (en) Josiah Royce et W. Fergus Kernan (1916) « Charles Sanders Peirce » The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Method v. 13, p. 701–9. Arisbe Eprint.
  • (en) « Opportunity awaits you »(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?), sur IUPUI (consulté le ).
  • Peirce (1893), The Categories MS 403. Arisbe Eprint, édité par Joseph Ransdell, with information on the re-write, and interleaved with the 1867 "New List" for comparison.
  • The ground blackness is the pure abstraction of the quality black which in turn amounts to—which embodies blackness. The quality amounts to reference to its own pure abstraction, the ground. The question is not merely of noun (the ground) versus adjective (the quality), but rather of whether we are considering the black(ness) as abstracted away from application to an object, or instead as so applied (for instance to a stove). Yet note that Peirce's distinction here is not that between a property-general and a property-individual (a trope). See "On a New List of Categories" (1867), in the section appearing in CP 1.551. Regarding the ground, cf. the Scholastic conception of a relation's foundation, Google limited preview Deely 1982, p. 61
  • Peirce (1902 MS), Carnegie Application, edited by Joseph Ransdell, Memoir 2, see table.
  • Modèle:À traduire, Eprint
  • Peirce (1902 MS) and Ransdell, Joseph, ed. (1998), Analysis of the Methods of Mathematical Demonstration, Memoir 4, Draft C, MS L75.90–102, voir pp. 99–100.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

googleusercontent.com

webcache.googleusercontent.com

gvsu.edu

agora.phi.gvsu.edu

helsinki.fi

ingentaconnect.com

iupui.edu

  • Houser, Nathan, « Introduction » W 5:xxviii-xxix, find "Allison".
  • (en) Houser, Nathan (1989) « Introduction » W 4:xxxviii, chercher "Eighty-nine".
  • Peirce, "Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic: Further Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy v. II, n. 4, pp. 193-208. Reprinted CP 5.318-357, W 2:242-272 (PEP Eprint), EP 1:56-82.

persee.fr

  • David Savan, « La séméiotique de Charles S. Peirce », Langages, no 58,‎ , p. 9-23 (lire en ligne).

princeton.edu

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Robert Burch, « Charles Sanders Peirce », dans The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, (lire en ligne)
  • (en) Hookway, Christopher (2008) « Pragmatism » Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Burch, Robert (2001, 2010), "Charles Sanders Peirce", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

textlog.de

  • Peirce (1897) Fallibilism, Continuity, and Evolution, CP 1.141–75 (Eprint), placed by the CP editors directly after F.R.L. (1899, CP 1.135–40).
  • Voir CP 1.34 Eprint (in The Spirit of Scholasticism), where Peirce ascribed the success of modern science less to a novel interest in verification than to the improvement of verification.
  • Peirce (1903), "Pragmatism – The Logic of Abduction", CP 5.195–205, especially 196. Eprint.

unicamp.br

digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp.br

uqam.ca

pep.uqam.ca

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • (en) Ketner et al. (1986) Comprehensive Bibliography, voir p. iii.
  • A quale in this sense is a such, just as a quality is a suchness. Cf. under "Use of Letters" in §3 of Peirce's "Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives", Memoirs of the American Academy, v. 9, pp. 317–78 (1870), separately reprinted (1870), from which see p. 6 via Google books, also reprinted in CP 3.63:

    « Now logical terms are of three grand classes. The first embraces those whose logical form (en) involves only the conception of quality, and which therefore represent a thing simply as “a —.” These discriminate objects in the most rudimentary way, which does not involve any consciousness of discrimination. They regard an object as it is in itself as such (quale); for example, as horse, tree, or man. These are absolute terms. (Peirce, 1870. But also see "Quale-Consciousness", 1898, in CP 6.222–37.) »

  • Voir en:Pragmaticism#Pragmaticism's name for discussion and references.

wikiwix.com

archive.wikiwix.com

worldcat.org