Complexité irréductible (French Wikipedia)

Hermann J. Muller: « Genetic variability, twin hybrids and constant hybrids, in a case of balanced lethal factors », Genetics, 1918, 3, 422-499, (en) spécialement p. 463-464.

harvard.edu

For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. David Mu, « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design ». Harvard Science Review, Vol. 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005. – Mark D. Decker « Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent » Review of: Unintelligent Design, by Mark Perakh . College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota.

Russell D. Fernald, (2001). « The Evolution of Eyes: Why Do We See What We See? » Karger Gazette 64: « The Eye in Focus ».

Eugenie C. Scott et Glenn Branch « Intelligent Design » Not Accepted by Most Scientists, National Center for Science Education website, September 10, 2002.

For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. David Mu, « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design ». Harvard Science Review, Vol. 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005. – Mark D. Decker « Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent » Review of: Unintelligent Design, by Mark Perakh . College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota.

Russell D. Fernald, (1997). " The evolution of eyes." Brain Behav Evol. 50 (p. 253–259).

Mark Pallen et Nicholas J. Matzke, 2006, « From The Origin of Species to the origin of bacterial flagella. » Nature Reviews Microbiology, (10), 784-790.
Ode to the Flagellum (en) Vidéo montrant la construction évolutive du flagelle selon Nicholas J. Matzke

Matt Inlay, 2002. « Evolving Immunity. » In TalkDesign.org.
Nicholas J. Matzke, 2003. « Evolution in (Brownian) space: a model for the origin of the bacterial flagellum. »
Pete Dunkelberg IC Demystified makes the point that : if « irreducible complexity » is tautologically redefined to allow a valid argument that intelligent design is the correct explanation for life then there is no such thing as irreducible complexity » in the mechanisms of life; while, if we use the unmodified original definition then « irreducible complexity » has nothing whatever to do with evolution.

Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, (1996), cité dans (en) Irreducible Complexity and Michael Behe (consulté le 8 janvier 2006).
George Action, « Behe and the Blood Clotting Cascade »
(en) Mark Isaak, « Complexity and design », Index to Creationist Claims, sur The TalkOrigins Archive : « Irreducible complexity and complex specified information are special cases of the "complexity indicates design claim"; they are also arguments from incredulity. ».
(en) Mark Isaak, « Argument from incredulity », Index to Creationist Claims, sur The TalkOrigins Archive : « The argument from incredulity creates a god of the gaps. ».