Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

David Chaytor (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "David Chaytor" in French language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank French rank
66bbc.co.uk
11th place
44th place
22web.archive.org
1st place
2nd place
11telegraph.co.uk
40th place
121st place
11parliament.uk
313th place
789th place
11scotsman.com
502nd place
959th place
11questia.com
1,682nd place
3,797th place

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; French: 44th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

  • Labour Mp, « David Chaytor », BBC News,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )
  • « Labour MP suspended over expenses », BBC News,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )
  • « Labour MP Chaytor to stand down », BBC News Online,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )
  • « Three MPs and one peer to be charged over expenses », BBC News,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )

bbc.co.uk

  • « MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claims », BBC,‎ (lire en ligne)
  • « MPs' expenses: David Chaytor to challenge sentence », BBC News,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )

parliament.uk (Global: 313th place; French: 789th place)

publications.parliament.uk

questia.com (Global: 1,682nd place; French: 3,797th place)

  • The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, « Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente », Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali,‎ (lire en ligne [archive du ], consulté le )

scotsman.com (Global: 502nd place; French: 959th place)

news.scotsman.com

  • « Four in court over expenses », The Scotsman,‎ (lire en ligne)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40th place; French: 121st place)

  • Victoria Ward, « David Chaytor, the former lecturer who fell foul of the expenses system », The Daily Telegraph,‎ (lire en ligne, consulté le )

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; French: 2nd place)

  • « House of Commons Hansard Debates for 17 Jun 1997 (pt 13) » [archive du ], www.parliament.uk (consulté le )
  • The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): Buonomo, « Per una nuova ipotesi di ricostruzione dell'effetto inibente », Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali,‎ (lire en ligne [archive du ], consulté le )