« it clearly is a scientific theory, because it is based entirely on physical data and logical inferences. »Whether Intelligent Design is Science, Michael Behe.
Nick Matzke, « Design on Trial: How NCSE Helped Win the Kitzmiller Case », Reports of the National Center for Science Education, vol. 26, nos 1–2, january–april 2006, p. 37–44 (ISSN2158-818X, lire en ligne, consulté le )
jmu.edu
math.jmu.edu
Jason Rosenhouse, « How Anti-Evolutionists Abuse Mathematics », The Mathematical Intelligencer, vol. 23, no 4, , p. 3–8 (lire en ligne [PDF])
Barbara Forrest, « Expert Witness Report », (consulté le ) Forrest's expert report in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Nick Matzke, « Design on Trial: How NCSE Helped Win the Kitzmiller Case », Reports of the National Center for Science Education, vol. 26, nos 1–2, january–april 2006, p. 37–44 (ISSN2158-818X, lire en ligne, consulté le )
Nick Matzke, « Critique: 'Of Pandas and People' », sur National Center for Science Education, Berkeley, Calif., National Center for Science Education, (consulté le ).
newscientist.com
« Evolutionary algorithms now surpass human designers », New Scientist, (lire en ligne)
(en) « Plato's Timaeus », Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (consulté le ).
talkdesign.org
John S. Wilkins, Wesley R. Elsberry, « The Advantages of Theft over Toil: The Design Inference and Arguing from Ignorance », Biology and Philosophy, vol. 16, , p. 711–724 (lire en ligne)
Branden Fitelson, Christopher Stephens et Elliott Sober, How Not to Detect Design : A review of William A. Dembski's The Design Inference—Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities, Cambridge University Press, , PDF (lire en ligne)
youtube.com
Débat entre le Dr. Genie Scott et Dr. Dembski, série Uncommon Knowledge, épisode Darwin under the Microscope: Questioning Darwinism, KTEH, 12/7/2001. Disponible en ligne.