(en) Andrew Mason, What's Wrong with Lookism? Personal Appearance, Discrimination, and Disadvantage, Oxford University Press, , 256 p. (lire en ligne).
doi.org
dx.doi.org
Hélène Garner-Moyer, « Le poids de l'apparence physique dans la décision d'embauche », Le Journal des psychologues, no 257, , p. 53-57 (DOI10.3917/jdp.257.0053).
(en) Jeff Biddle, Daniel Hamermesh, « Beauty, Productivity, and Discrimination: Lawyers' Looks and Lucre », Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 16, no 1, , p. 172-201 (DOI10.1086/209886).
(en) Alain Paraponaris, Bérengère Saliba, Bruno Ventelou, « Obesity, weight status and employability: Empirical evidence from a French national survey », Economics & Human Biology, vol. 3, no 2, , p. 241-258 (DOI10.1016/j.ehb.2005.06.001).
(en) Stephen Buck, Drew Tiene, « The Impact of Physical Attractiveness, Gender, and Teaching Philosophy on Teacher Evaluations », Journal of Educational Research, vol. 82, no 3, , p. 172-177 (DOI10.1080/00220671.1989.10885887).
(en) Giam Pietro Cipriani, Angelo Zago, « Productivity or discrimination? Beauty and the exams », Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 3, nos 428-447, (DOI10.2139/ssrn.2158579).
(en) Daniel Hamermesh, Amy M. Parker, « Beauty in the Classroom: Instructors' Pulchritude and Putative Pedagogical Productivity », Economics of Education Review, vol. 24, no 4, , p. 369-376 (DOI10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013).
(en) Alexi Gugushvili, Grzegorz Bulczak, « Physical attractiveness and intergenerational social mobility », Social Science Quarterly, vol. 104, no 7, , p. 1360-1382 (DOI10.1111/ssqu.13320).
(en) Shengying Zhai, Qihui Chen, Qiran Zhao, « Beauty and popularity in friendship networks—Evidence from migrant schools in China », Economics Letters, vol. 215, no 1, (DOI10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110468).
(en) Zhongwu Li, « Physical attractiveness and women’s intra-household bargaining », Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, (DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853083).
(en) Jia Jin, Bonai Fan, Shenyi Dai, Qingguo Ma, « Beauty premium: Event-related potentials evidence of how physical attractiveness matters in online peer-to-peer lending », janvier 2017, vol. 640, no 1, neuroscience letters, p. 130-135 (DOI10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.037).
(en) Bradley J. Ruffle, Arie Sherman, Ze'ev Shtudiner, « Gender and beauty price discrimination in produce markets », Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 97, no 1, (DOI10.1016/j.socec.2022.101825).
(en) Angela S. Ahola, Sven Christianson, Åke Hellström, « Justice Needs a Blindfold: Effects of Gender and Attractiveness on Prison Sentences and Attributions of Personal Characteristics in a Judicial Process », Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, vol. 16, no 1 (sup), , p. 90–100 (DOI10.1080/132187108022420).
(en) Steve Bickley, Ho Fai Chan, Ahmed Skali, David Stadelmann, « How Large is the Beauty Premium in Politics? », SSRN Electronic Journal, (DOI10.2139/ssrn.4363164).
Julie Duflos, Oumaya Hidri Neys, « Entre perceptions accrues et recours marginaux : le paradoxe des discriminations selon l’apparence physique à l’embauche », Cahiers de la LCD (Lutte contre les discriminations), no 6, , p. 99-117 (DOI10.3917/clcd.006.0099).
hofstra.edu
„Lookism is the belief that appearance is an indicator of a person’s value. It refers to society’s construction of a standard for beauty or attractiveness, and the resulting oppression that occurs through stereotypes and generalizations about those who do and do not meet society’s standards.“, Many Paths To Justice: The Glass Ceiling, the Looking Glass, and Strategies for Getting to the Other Side[PDF], cité d'après M. Neil Browne, Andrea Giampetro-Meyer.
