« Mişcarea Legionară, între istorie și percepții actuale. Amestec de fascism și atitudini populiste », Polis. Journal of Political Science, vol. 3, no 37, , p. 65–80 (lire en ligne)
Although he was well aware of the disastrous condition of the Romanian peasantry, he refused to examine its causes. He wrote: There is no doubt that our peasantry is the most backward in all of Europe; in no other country, not even in Turkey has the peasantry been left so far behind as the peasantry in the Romanian kingdom. - Radu Ioanid, „Nicolae Iorga and Fascism”, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 27, no 3 (juillet 1992), p. 467-492, Sage Publications, Ltd.
Zvi Yavetz, „An Eyewitness Note: Reflections on the Rumanian Iron Guard”, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 26, No. 3/4, republié dans The Impact of Western Nationalisms : Essays Dedicated to Walter Z. Laqueur on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday (Sep., 1991), p. 597-610, Sage Publications, Ltd.
Ideologies and National Identities : The Case of Twentieth-Century Southeastern Europe, Central European University Press, coll. « CEUP collection », , 19–53 p. (ISBN9786155053856, lire en ligne), « Chapter 1. Charisma, Religion, and Ideology: Romania's Interwar Legion of the Archangel Michael »
Elie Wiesel (coord.), Comisia Internațională pentru Studierea Holocaustului în România : raport final, (« Rapport final de la commission internationale pour l'étude de l'holocauste en Roumanie ») ed. Polirom, Iași 2005, (ISBN973-681-990-6), [1].
