(en) M. G. Chitkara, Buddhism, reincarnation, and Dalai Lamas of Tibet, New Delhi, A.P.H. Pub. Corp, , 236 p. (ISBN978-81-7024-930-6 et 8170249309, lire en ligne), p. 164 : « The British government, the only government among Western countries to have had treaty relations with Tibet, sold the Tibetans down the river and since then have constantly cold-shouldered the Tibetans so that in 1959 they could not even support a resolution in the UN condemning the violation of human rights in Tibet by the Chinese. »
c100tibet.org
(en) About Us Committee of 100 for Tibet, « We defend the right of Tibetans to their own national identity and chosen way of life and are committed to advancing the Tibetan people's legitimate right to decide their own future consistent with their United Nations-recognized right to self-determination. »
(en) Wang Jiawei et Nyima Gyaincain, The Historical Status of China's Tibet : « Razheng asked Gyaiboin Cang Toinzhub Namgyai, a good friend and a Garze deputy to the National Assembly, to carry a letter warning the Central Government of Dagzha's move to collaborate with the British to undermine ties between the Han and the Tibetan. Razheng asked the Central Government to order Dagzha to resign. / When Hugh Richardson was informed of the news, he visited Prince Regent Dagzha in February 1947 and said that Razheng had sent people to demand that the Kuomintang send troops into Tibet, and the Kuomintang was prepared to give him this military support to become Prince Regent again, and planned an air raid on Lhasa. »
(en) Alex McKay, Tibet and the British Raj : the frontier cadre, 1904-1947, Richmond, Surrey, Curzon, , 293 p. (ISBN978-0-7007-0627-3, lire en ligne), p. 148
Melvyn C. Goldstein, A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State, University of California Press, (lire en ligne), p.475.
(en) Wang Jiawei et Nyima Gyaincain, The Historical Status of China's Tibet, 1997, 33 p., p. 179 : « So far as Hugh Richardson is concerned, he lied in claiming that before the Gaxag government decided to expel the Han from Tibet, "the Indian delegation knew nothing beforehand." (Hugh Richardson [Britain]: Tibet and its History, p. 155, translated by Li Youyi). A. Tom Grunfeld pointed out in explicit terms that if Hugh Richardon did not propose to the Tibetan officials the expulsion of the Han, the Tibetans would never have come up with this idea; certainly, Hugh Richardson has become involved with this event in a certain way (A. Tom Grunfeld [Canada]: The Making of Modern Tibet, p. 114 and p. 119, translated by Wu Kunming). »
(en) Alex McKay, The Establishment of the British Trade Agencies in Tibet: A Survey, in Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1992), Third Series, 2, pp. 399-421 : « After 1936 a mission was stationed in Lhasa. The last British official in Lhasa, Hugh Richardson, departed in 1950 following the Chinese invasion of Tibet ».
(en) Heather Spence, British Policy and the 'development' of Tibet 1912-1933, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of History and Politics, Faculty of Arts, University of Wollingong [Australia], 1993, x + 362 p. : « He remained in Lhasa, the first white representative to function in the capital, from 1936-1940 and again from 1946, having held a number of offices in the intervening years. (...) He returned to Lhasa after the end of the war as British representative [...]. »
ust.hk
cctr.ust.hk
(en) Barry Sautman, All that Glitters is Not Gold: Tibet as a Pseudo-State, p. 11 : « There were, moreover, expulsion of Han Chinese in 1912 and 1949, the latter, it appears, at the instigation of Hugh Richardson, the British Representative in Lhasa ».
