Ligne de Kármán (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ligne de Kármán" in French language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank French rank

4wikipedia.org

low place

3nasa.gov

75^th place

160^th place

3doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

2fai.org

4,927^th place

3,051^st place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1theverge.com

114^th place

415^th place

1abc.es

252^nd place

754^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

11^th place

1archive.org

6^th place

63^rd place

1smu.edu

6,719^th place

low place

1state.gov

264^th place

498^th place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

118^th place

1arxiv.org

69^th place

232^nd place

1sciencemag.org

857^th place

208^th place

1livescience.com

1,190^th place

2,237^th place

abc.es

(es) Gonzalo López Sánchez, « Un cohete inventado por los nazis, la primera máquina que llegó al espacio », en Abc, 11-10-2017: http://www.abc.es/ciencia/abci-cohete-inventado-nazis-primera-maquina-llego-espacio-201710102051_noticia.html.

archive.org

(en) Boleslaw Adam Boczek (pl), International Law: A Dictionary, Scarecrow Press, 2005 (lire en ligne), 239 :
« Proposal concerning the upper limit of national airspace are based on various scientific and technological criteria… the lowest safe altitude for orbiting artificial satellites (about 100km). »

arxiv.org

(en) Jonathan C McDowell, « The edge of space: Revisiting the Karman Line », Acta Astronautica (en), vol. 151,‎ 2018, p. 668–677 (DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.003 , Bibcode 2018AcAau.151..668M, arXiv 1807.07894).

books.google.com

International Law: A Dictionary, par Boleslaw Adam Boczek (pl) ; Scarecrow Press, 2005 ; page 239 : « The issue whether it is possible or useful to establish a legal boundary between airspace and outer space has been debated in the doctrine for quite a long time… no agreement exists on a fixed airspace – outer space boundary… »

doi.org

dx.doi.org

(en) Jonathan C McDowell, « The edge of space: Revisiting the Karman Line », Acta Astronautica (en), vol. 151,‎ 2018, p. 668–677 (DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.003 , Bibcode 2018AcAau.151..668M, arXiv 1807.07894).
(en) Thomas Gangale, How High the Sky? The Definition and Delimitation of Outer Space and Territorial Airspace in International Law, vol. 13, Leiden, Pays-Bas, Koninklijke Brill NV, coll. « Studies in Space Law », 2018 (ISBN 978-90-04-36602-2, DOI 10.1163/9789004366022).
(en) Paul Voosen, « Outer space may have just gotten a bit closer », Science,‎ 24 juillet 2018 (DOI 10.1126/science.aau8822, lire en ligne, consulté le 1^er avril 2019).

fai.org

(en) « The 100 km Boundary for Astronautics » [doc], sur fai.org, Fédération aéronautique internationale.
(en) D^r S. Sanz Fernández de Córdoba, « The 100 km Boundary for Astronautics », sur fai.org, Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, 24 juin 2004 (consulté le 28 décembre 2020).

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

(en) Jonathan C McDowell, « The edge of space: Revisiting the Karman Line », Acta Astronautica (en), vol. 151,‎ 2018, p. 668–677 (DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.003 , Bibcode 2018AcAau.151..668M, arXiv 1807.07894).

livescience.com

(en) Brandon Specktor, « The Edge of Space Just Crept 12 Miles Closer to Earth », Live Science,‎ 25 juillet 2018 (lire en ligne, consulté le 1^er avril 2019).

nasa.gov

(en) « Schneider walks the Walk [A word about the definition of space] », NASA, 21 octobre 2005 (consulté le 29 avril 2008).
(en) « NASA – Schneider walks the Walk », sur nasa.gov (consulté le 19 octobre 2018).
(en) « A long-overdue tribute », sur nasa.gov, NASA, 21 octobre 2005 (consulté le 30 octobre 2006).

sciencemag.org

(en) Paul Voosen, « Outer space may have just gotten a bit closer », Science,‎ 24 juillet 2018 (DOI 10.1126/science.aau8822, lire en ligne, consulté le 1^er avril 2019).

smu.edu

scholar.smu.edu

(en) Matthew T. King, « Sovereignty’s Gray Area: The Delimitation of Air and Space in the Context of Aerospace Vehicles and the Use of Force », Journal of Air Law and Commerce (en), vol. 81, n^o 3,‎ 2016, p. 432 (lire en ligne).

state.gov

2009-2017.state.gov

(en) « Delegation of the U.S., Statement on the Definition and Delimitation of Outer Space and the Character and Utilization of the Geostationary Orbit, to the Comm. on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Legal Subcomm. of Its Fortieth Session (Apr. 2–13, 2001) » [archive du 28 mars 2020] (consulté le 21 novembre 2019) : « With respect to the question of the definition and delimitation of outer space, we have examined this issue carefully and have listened to the various statements delivered at this session. Our position continues to be that defining or delimiting outer space is not necessary. No legal or practical problems have arisen in the absence of such a definition. On the contrary, the differing legal regimes applicable in respect of airspace and outer space have operated well in their respective spheres. The lack of a definition or delimitation of outer space has not impeded the development of activities in either sphere ».

theverge.com

(en) Loren Grush, « Why defining the boundary of space may be crucial for the future of spaceflight », The Verge,‎ 13 décembre 2018 (lire en ligne, consulté le 1^er avril 2019).

web.archive.org

(en) « Delegation of the U.S., Statement on the Definition and Delimitation of Outer Space and the Character and Utilization of the Geostationary Orbit, to the Comm. on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Legal Subcomm. of Its Fortieth Session (Apr. 2–13, 2001) » [archive du 28 mars 2020] (consulté le 21 novembre 2019) : « With respect to the question of the definition and delimitation of outer space, we have examined this issue carefully and have listened to the various statements delivered at this session. Our position continues to be that defining or delimiting outer space is not necessary. No legal or practical problems have arisen in the absence of such a definition. On the contrary, the differing legal regimes applicable in respect of airspace and outer space have operated well in their respective spheres. The lack of a definition or delimitation of outer space has not impeded the development of activities in either sphere ».
(en) Graham Gyatt, « The Standard Atmosphere » (Un modèle mathématique de l'atmosphère standard américaine en 1976), 14 janvier 2006 (version du 31 mars 2012 sur Internet Archive).

wikipedia.org

pl.wikipedia.org

International Law: A Dictionary, par Boleslaw Adam Boczek (pl) ; Scarecrow Press, 2005 ; page 239 : « The issue whether it is possible or useful to establish a legal boundary between airspace and outer space has been debated in the doctrine for quite a long time… no agreement exists on a fixed airspace – outer space boundary… »
(en) Boleslaw Adam Boczek (pl), International Law: A Dictionary, Scarecrow Press, 2005 (lire en ligne), 239 :
« Proposal concerning the upper limit of national airspace are based on various scientific and technological criteria… the lowest safe altitude for orbiting artificial satellites (about 100km). »

en.wikipedia.org

(en) Matthew T. King, « Sovereignty’s Gray Area: The Delimitation of Air and Space in the Context of Aerospace Vehicles and the Use of Force », Journal of Air Law and Commerce (en), vol. 81, n^o 3,‎ 2016, p. 432 (lire en ligne).
(en) Jonathan C McDowell, « The edge of space: Revisiting the Karman Line », Acta Astronautica (en), vol. 151,‎ 2018, p. 668–677 (DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.003 , Bibcode 2018AcAau.151..668M, arXiv 1807.07894).