(en) Robert K. Ressler et Tom Shachtman, I Have Lived in the Monster, New York, St. Martin's Press, , 31–44 (ISBN0312155522), « A Case of More Than Mistaken Identity ».
bbc.com
(en-GB) « Yoshihiro Hattori: The door knock that killed a Japanese teenager in US », BBC News, (lire en ligne, consulté le ).
books.google.com
(en) Cynthia Lee, Murder and the Reasonable Man: Passion and Fear in the Criminal Courtroom, NYU Press, (ISBN978-0-8147-5116-9, lire en ligne).
(en) Carolyn Boyes-Watson, Crime and Justice: Learning through Cases, Rowman & Littlefield, (ISBN9781538106914, lire en ligne), p. 119.
carleton.edu
apps.carleton.edu
(en-US) David Schimke, « Each Other's Arms », sur Voice (consulté le ).
courtlistener.com
(en) « Hattori v. Peairs », (consulté le ), The shooting attracted national, as well as international attention. Following a four-day trial on September 12–15, 1994, the trial judge rendered judgment in favor of Yoshi's parents, Masaichi and Mieko Hattori (the Hattoris) finding Rodney Peairs to be solidarily liable with his homeowner's insurer, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau), in the amount of $653,077.85 together with legal interest and costs. Farm Bureau's liability was subject to the $100,000.00 coverage limitations of its policy. ... While we do not doubt that Rodney Peairs' fear of impending bodily harm was genuine, we nevertheless find nothing within the record to support his assertion that such fear was reasonable. Prior to the shooting, Yoshi and Webb had announced their presence by ringing the doorbell of the Peairs' home. Testifying that he believed Yoshi to be armed, Rodney Peairs conceded that he did not see a gun, a knife, a stick, or a club only an object which he later ascertained to be a camera. In the well-lit carport, Rodney Peairs stated that he observed an oriental person proceeding towards him and that he appeared to be laughing. We have no idea why Yoshi failed to heed Rodney Peairs' order to "Freeze," or grasp the danger posed by the gun, but can only speculate that the answer stems from cultural differences and an unfamiliarity with American slang. Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot say that it was either reasonable or necessary for Rodney Peairs to resort to the use of deadly force in order to protect himself and his family.
(en) « Hattori v. Peairs », sur Supreme Court of Louisiana, (consulté le ), Denied.
