(en) Ben Lovejoy, « CrowdStrike aftermath: Microsoft claims it cannot legally implement the same protections as Apple » , sur 9to5Mac, (consulté le ) : « Microsoft’s claim here seems dubious. Antitrust law means that it cannot give its own security software an unfair advantage over third-party apps. However, if it took the same endpoint security framework approach as Apple, and gave third-party apps the same access to the results as it does its own security apps, this would seem to be fully compliant with the law. »
(en) Chris Stokel-Walker(en), « CrowdStrike could have a European-size data problem on its hands » , sur Fast Company, (consulté le ) : « Alongside the inevitable class action lawsuits CrowdStrike will likely face in the United States for the disruption its erroneous update caused, it could be on the hook in the U.K. and Europe for potential breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which imposes limits on how companies can collect data without user consent. Fines under the GDPR can be up to 4% of a company’s global revenue. »
(en-US) David Weston, « Helping our customers through the CrowdStrike outage » , sur The Official Microsoft Blog, (consulté le ) : « We currently estimate that CrowdStrike’s update affected 8.5 million Windows devices, or less than one percent of all Windows machines. While the percentage was small, the broad economic and societal impacts reflect the use of CrowdStrike by enterprises that run many critical services. »
(en) Chris Stokel-Walker(en), « CrowdStrike could have a European-size data problem on its hands » , sur Fast Company, (consulté le ) : « Alongside the inevitable class action lawsuits CrowdStrike will likely face in the United States for the disruption its erroneous update caused, it could be on the hook in the U.K. and Europe for potential breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which imposes limits on how companies can collect data without user consent. Fines under the GDPR can be up to 4% of a company’s global revenue. »