A. Bastardi, E. L. Uhlmann et L. Ross, « Wishful Thinking: Belief, Desire, and the Motivated Evaluation of Scientific Evidence », Psychological Science, vol. 22, no 6, , p. 731–732 (PMID21515736, DOI10.1177/0956797611406447)
D. Dunning et E. Balcetis, « Wishful Seeing: How Preferences Shape Visual Perception », Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 22, , p. 33–37 (DOI10.1177/0963721412463693)
D. Stokes, « Perceiving and desiring: A new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience », Philosophical Studies, vol. 158, no 3, , p. 477–492 (DOI10.1007/s11098-010-9688-8, lire en ligne)
M. Riccio, S. Cole et E. Balcetis, « Seeing the Expected, the Desired, and the Feared: Influences on Perceptual Interpretation and Directed Attention », Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 7, no 6, , p. 401–414 (DOI10.1111/spc3.12028)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Wishful Seeing: More Desired Objects Are Seen as Closer », Psychological Science, vol. 21, , p. 147–152 (PMID20424036, DOI10.1177/0956797609356283)
N. R. Van Ulzen, G. N. R. Semin, R. U. R. D. Oudejans et P. J. Beek, « Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion », Psychological Research, vol. 72, no 3, , p. 304–310 (PMID17410379, PMCID2668624, DOI10.1007/s00426-007-0114-6)
S. Cole, E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Affective Signals of Threat Increase Perceived Proximity », Psychological Science, vol. 24, , p. 34–40 (PMID23160204, DOI10.1177/0956797612446953)
Z. Krizan et P. D. Windschitl, « The influence of outcome desirability on optimism », Psychological Bulletin, vol. 133, , p. 95–121 (PMID17201572, DOI10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.95)
T. Aue, H. C. Nusbaum et J. T. Cacioppo, « Neural correlates of wishful thinking », Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 7, no 8, , p. 991–1000 (PMCID3501709, DOI10.1093/scan/nsr081)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 91, no 4, , p. 612–25 (PMID17014288, DOI10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612)
G. Lupyan, S. L. Thompson-Schill et D. Swingley, « Conceptual Penetration of Visual Processing », Psychological Science, vol. 21, no 5, , p. 682–691 (PMID20483847, PMCID4152984, DOI10.1177/0956797610366099)
K. Kveraga, J. Boshyan et M. Bar, « Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition », Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no 48, , p. 13232–13240 (PMID18045917, DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007)
E. Babad et Y. Katz, « Wishful Thinking—Against All Odds », Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 21, no 23, , p. 1921–1938 (DOI10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00514.x)
G. Wood, S. J. Vine et M. R. Wilson, « The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance », Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 75, no 5, , p. 830–834 (DOI10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y)
R. C. White et A. A. Davies, « Attention set for number: Expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness », Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 34, no 5, , p. 1092–1107 (DOI10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1092)
D. Rahnev, B. Maniscalco, T. Graves, E. Huang, F. P. De Lange et H. Lau, « Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception », Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no 12, , p. 1513–1515 (PMID22019729, DOI10.1038/nn.2948)
L. F. Barrett, B. Mesquita et M. Gendron, « Context in Emotion Perception », Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 20, no 5, , p. 286–290 (DOI10.1177/0963721411422522)
T. Sharot, A. M. Riccardi, C. M. Raio et E. A. Phelps, « Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias », Nature, vol. 450, no 7166, , p. 102–5 (PMID17960136, DOI10.1038/nature06280)
(en) E. Balcetis, R. Dale, « Conceptual set as a top - down constraint on visual object identification », Perception, vol. 36, no 4, , p. 581–595 (DOI10.1068/p5678)
(en) M. A. Changizi, W. G. Hall, « Thirst modulates a perception », Perception, vol. 30, no 12, , p. 1489–1497 (DOI10.1068/p3266)
J. K. Witt, « Action's Effect on Perception », Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 20, no 3, , p. 201–206 (DOI10.1177/0963721411408770)
D. R. Proffitt, « Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action », Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no 2, , p. 110–122 (DOI10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Cognitive Dissonance and the Perception of Natural Environments », Psychological Science, vol. 18, no 10, , p. 917–21 (PMID17894610, DOI10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02000.x)
doi.org
(en) K. D. Harber, D. Yeung, A. Iacovelli, « Psychosocial resources, threat, and the perception of distance and height: Support for the resources and perception model », Emotion, vol. 11, no 5, , p. 1080–1090 (lire en ligne)
duq.edu
(en) « The Pygmalion Effect », sur www.duq.edu, Duquesne University (consulté le )
A. Bastardi, E. L. Uhlmann et L. Ross, « Wishful Thinking: Belief, Desire, and the Motivated Evaluation of Scientific Evidence », Psychological Science, vol. 22, no 6, , p. 731–732 (PMID21515736, DOI10.1177/0956797611406447)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Wishful Seeing: More Desired Objects Are Seen as Closer », Psychological Science, vol. 21, , p. 147–152 (PMID20424036, DOI10.1177/0956797609356283)
N. R. Van Ulzen, G. N. R. Semin, R. U. R. D. Oudejans et P. J. Beek, « Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion », Psychological Research, vol. 72, no 3, , p. 304–310 (PMID17410379, PMCID2668624, DOI10.1007/s00426-007-0114-6)
S. Cole, E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Affective Signals of Threat Increase Perceived Proximity », Psychological Science, vol. 24, , p. 34–40 (PMID23160204, DOI10.1177/0956797612446953)
Z. Krizan et P. D. Windschitl, « The influence of outcome desirability on optimism », Psychological Bulletin, vol. 133, , p. 95–121 (PMID17201572, DOI10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.95)
T. Aue, H. C. Nusbaum et J. T. Cacioppo, « Neural correlates of wishful thinking », Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 7, no 8, , p. 991–1000 (PMCID3501709, DOI10.1093/scan/nsr081)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 91, no 4, , p. 612–25 (PMID17014288, DOI10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612)
G. Lupyan, S. L. Thompson-Schill et D. Swingley, « Conceptual Penetration of Visual Processing », Psychological Science, vol. 21, no 5, , p. 682–691 (PMID20483847, PMCID4152984, DOI10.1177/0956797610366099)
K. Kveraga, J. Boshyan et M. Bar, « Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition », Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no 48, , p. 13232–13240 (PMID18045917, DOI10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007)
D. Rahnev, B. Maniscalco, T. Graves, E. Huang, F. P. De Lange et H. Lau, « Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception », Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no 12, , p. 1513–1515 (PMID22019729, DOI10.1038/nn.2948)
T. Sharot, A. M. Riccardi, C. M. Raio et E. A. Phelps, « Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias », Nature, vol. 450, no 7166, , p. 102–5 (PMID17960136, DOI10.1038/nature06280)
E. Balcetis et D. Dunning, « Cognitive Dissonance and the Perception of Natural Environments », Psychological Science, vol. 18, no 10, , p. 917–21 (PMID17894610, DOI10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02000.x)
philpapers.org
D. Stokes, « Perceiving and desiring: A new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience », Philosophical Studies, vol. 158, no 3, , p. 477–492 (DOI10.1007/s11098-010-9688-8, lire en ligne)