Phillip E. Johnson (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Phillip E. Johnson" in French language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank French rank

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

194^th place

17^th place

87^th place

20^th place

2googleusercontent.com

243^rd place

21^st place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

low place

1,162^nd place

1,931^st place

18^th place

118^th place

low place

low place

low place

3,702^nd place

archive.is

« For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. », [PDF] « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)} (consulté le 8 avril 2013), David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, automne 2005.
« We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science....It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom. » « National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)}, communiqué de presse de ma National Science Teachers Association, 3 août 2005.

canada.com

(en) « Aids 'denialism' gathers strange bedfellows », Vancouver Sun,‎ 17 juin 2006 (lire en ligne, consulté le 17 juillet 2008)

googleusercontent.com

webcache.googleusercontent.com

« For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. », [PDF] « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)} (consulté le 8 avril 2013), David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, automne 2005.
« We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science....It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom. » « National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)}, communiqué de presse de ma National Science Teachers Association, 3 août 2005.

harvard.edu

hcs.harvard.edu

« For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. », [PDF] « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)} (consulté le 8 avril 2013), David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, automne 2005.

infidels.org

« The Wedge at Work: How Intelligent Design Creationism Is Wedging Its Way into the Cultural and Academic Mainstream », Barbara Forrest, Chapter 1, Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics, MIT Press, 2001.

jci.org

« Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action », Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116:1134-1138, American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006.

nsta.org

« We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science....It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom. » « National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)}, communiqué de presse de ma National Science Teachers Association, 3 août 2005.

seattlest.com

(en) « Undercover at the Discovery Institute », Seattlest, 8 septembre 2006 (consulté le 17 juillet 2008)

virusmyth.com

Virusmyth.net website

web.archive.org

« For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. », [PDF] « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)} (consulté le 8 avril 2013), David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, automne 2005.
« We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science....It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom. » « National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)}, communiqué de presse de ma National Science Teachers Association, 3 août 2005.

wikiwix.com

archive.wikiwix.com

« For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. », [PDF] « Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)} (consulté le 8 avril 2013), David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, automne 2005.
« We stand with the nation's leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president's top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science....It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom. » « National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush »^{(Archive.org • Wikiwix • Archive.is • Google • Que faire ?)}, communiqué de presse de ma National Science Teachers Association, 3 août 2005.