Rapports Kinsey (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Rapports Kinsey" in French language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank French rank
low place
8,870th place
412th place
1,223rd place
424th place
818th place
2,113th place
4,481st place
low place
low place
5th place
13th place
70th place
196th place
43rd place
132nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2nd place
3rd place
low place
low place
7th place
28th place
198th place
515th place

doi.org

dx.doi.org

  • (en) William G. Cochran, Frederick Mosteller & John W. Tukey (1953) Statistical Problems of the Kinsey Report, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 48:264, 673-716, DOI 10.1080/01621459.1953.10501194

findarticles.com

heraldtimesonline.com

  • (en) Andrews Welsh-Huggins, « Conservative group attacks Kinsey data on children », Herald-Times,‎ (lire en ligne) :

    « (en) 'There couldn't have been any research if we turned them in,' he said. 'Of course we knew when we interviewed pedophiles that they would continue the activity, but we didn't do anything about that.' Providing such absolute assurances of anonymity was the only way to guarantee honest answers on such taboo subjects, said Gebhard. »

indiana.edu

kinseyinstitute.org

  • (en) Kinsey Institute statement denies child abuse in study
  • (en) Martin Duberman on Gebhart's "cleaning" of data, Kinsey Institute
  • http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/controversy%202.htm Reisman déboutée, l’institut Kinsey innocenté: «Allegations against Alfred Kinsey and his research on children's sexual responses, as reported in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, were first made in 1981 by Judith Reisman. She subsequently enlarged on these ideas in a book written jointly with Edward Eichel and published in 1990 (Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud). When The Kinsey Institute responded, Reisman filed suit in 1991 against The Kinsey Institute, then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, alleging defamation of character and slander. In September 1993, Reisman's lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice (which means that Reisman is prohibited from refiling the suit).»
  • http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/controversy%202.htm Source des informations publiees sur la sexualité pré-pubère: «Kinsey clearly stated in his male volume the sources of information about children's sexual responses. The bulk of this information was obtained from adults recalling their own childhoods. Some was from parents who had observed their children, some from teachers who had observed children interacting or behaving sexually, and Kinsey stated that there were nine men who he had interviewed who had sexual experiences with children who had told him about how the children had responded and reacted. We believe that one of those men was the source of the data listed in the book.»
  • (en) Whereas he had some information of this kind from parents and teachers simply observing children, he obtained more from men who had been sexually involved with young boys and who had in the process observed their orgasms. Having therefore made it clear that he was referring to adults who had been involved in illegal sexual interactions with children, he went on to say, "nine of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which they have put at our disposal; and from them we have secured information on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self-masturbation, or were observed in contacts with other boys or older adults." Kinsey Institute director denies allegations by Reisman, Kinsey Institute

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

nytimes.com

pbs.org

psychiatrie-und-ethik.de

  • Alec’s Report on Alfred Kinsey, psychiatrie-und-ethik.de, avril 2004. «Following a comment of Dr Reisman: I was honored to serve as ALEC’s Scientific Advisor to the Subcommittee on Junk Science for this project
  • The evidence presented in this State Factor reveals compelling evidence of illegal and criminal acts masquerading as science taken from Kinsey’s confessions in his own “Reports” (1948-1953). Dr. Alfred Kinsey was a “sexual revolutionary” and his “Kinsey Reports” are junk science. Professor of Constitutional law Dr. Charles Rice of Notre Dame concluded that Alfred Kinsey’s research was: “…contrived, ideologically driven and misleading. Any judge, legislator or other public official who gives credence to that research is guilty of malpractice and dereliction of duty.” in Alec’s Report on Alfred Kinsey, psychiatrie-und-ethik.de, avril 2004

special-guests.com

swlearning.com

theage.com.au

  • (en) The bedroom and beyond, article du Telegraph Magazine, 13 novembre 2004. Article en ligne sur theage.com.au
  • (en) Mick Brown, « The bedroom and beyond », Telegraph magazine,‎ (lire en ligne) :

    « (en) « The sexual histories of the 18,000 people interviewed by Kinsey and his inner circle remain under lock and key in the archives of the institute. Since Kinsey's death, the code that links each history to the name of the subject has been handed down from each director to the next like holy writ ». »

  • (en) Mick Brown, « The bedroom and beyond », Telegraph magazine,‎ (lire en ligne) :

    « Kinsey travelled to Arizona, where he met King once to record a sexual history that included many incidents of incest, bestiality and pedophilia; they continued to correspond and Kinsey used much of King's material as "scientific studies" in his chapter on pre-adolescent sexuality ». (King est le nom de cet unique témoin) »

wikidata.org

worldcat.org