Robin Bravender, « CLIMATE: Scientists return fire at sceptics in 'destroyed data' dispute », Greenwire, (lire en ligne)
factcheck.org
(en-US) Jess Henig, « Climategate », sur FactCheck.org, (consulté le )
google.com
Stringer, David, Associated Press, « Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate », : « Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data. »
gpo.gov
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.
independent.co.uk
Michael McCarthy, « 'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails », The Independent, (lire en ligne [archive du ], consulté le )
issn.org
portal.issn.org
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.
Chameides, Bill. "Climategate Redux." Scientific American, 30 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.
scotsman.com
news.scotsman.com
Craig Brown, « The forecast for Scotland: wet, wet, wet », The Scotsman, (lire en ligne, consulté le )
Michael McCarthy, « 'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails », The Independent, (lire en ligne [archive du ], consulté le )
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.
wsj.com
Keith Johnson, « Climate Strife Comes to Light », The Wall Street Journal, (lire en ligne)