Unité de recherche climatique (French Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Unité de recherche climatique" in French language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank French rank

9web.archive.org

1^st place

9uea.ac.uk

low place

9,346^th place

4bbc.co.uk

8^th place

42^nd place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

11^th place

2nature.com

234^th place

147^th place

2wsj.com

79^th place

267^th place

2nytimes.com

7^th place

28^th place

2scientificamerican.com

896^th place

1,435^th place

1scotsman.com

413^th place

746^th place

1metoffice.gov.uk

2,735^th place

2,344^th place

1independent.co.uk

36^th place

125^th place

1archive.org

6^th place

63^rd place

1eenews.net

low place

1factcheck.org

7,075^th place

low place

1google.com

163^rd place

207^th place

1reason.com

2,186^th place

7,040^th place

1deccanherald.com

516^th place

low place

1sciencemag.org

857^th place

208^th place

1cbc.ca

115^th place

358^th place

1issn.org

57^th place

4^th place

1gpo.gov

1,360^th place

2,820^th place

archive.org

David D. Kemp, The environment dictionary, Psychology Press, 1998, 72–3 (ISBN 978-0-415-12752-3, lire en ligne )

bbc.co.uk

Richard Black, « Climate unit releases virtually all remaining data », sur BBC News, 27 juillet 2011 (consulté le 15 novembre 2012)
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).
Richard Black, « Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study », BBC News,‎ 21 octobre 2011 (lire en ligne, consulté le 15 novembre 2012)

news.bbc.co.uk

« Hackers target leading climate research unit », BBC News,‎ 20 novembre 2009 (lire en ligne)

books.google.com

Michael Sanderson, The history of the University of East Anglia, Norwich, 2002 (ISBN 978-1-85285-336-5, lire en ligne), p. 285
Michael Sanderson, The history of the University of East Anglia, Norwich, 2002 (ISBN 978-1-85285-336-5, lire en ligne), p. 345

cbc.ca

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

deccanherald.com

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

eenews.net

Robin Bravender, « CLIMATE: Scientists return fire at sceptics in 'destroyed data' dispute », Greenwire,‎ 14 octobre 2009 (lire en ligne)

factcheck.org

(en-US) Jess Henig, « Climategate », sur FactCheck.org, 10 décembre 2009 (consulté le 21 juin 2020)

google.com

Stringer, David, Associated Press, « Hackers leak e-mails, stoke climate debate », 21 novembre 2009 : « Some climate change skeptics and bloggers claim the information shows scientists have overstated the case for global warming, and allege the documents contain proof that some researchers have attempted to manipulate data. »

gpo.gov

Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN 0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

independent.co.uk

Michael McCarthy, « 'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails », The Independent,‎ 8 juillet 2010 (lire en ligne [archive du 7 mars 2016], consulté le 20 janvier 2017)

issn.org

portal.issn.org

Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN 0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

metoffice.gov.uk

(en) « Global temperature 2008: Another top-ten-year » [archive du 11 mai 2008], Met Office, 3 janvier 2008 (consulté le 1^er novembre 2008)

nature.com

« Climate data spat intensifies », Nature, n^o 460,‎ 12 août 2009, p. 787 (lire en ligne) Subscription or payment required to read article.
"Closing the Climategate." Nature. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.

nytimes.com

Revkin, Andrew. (20 November 2009). Hacked E-Mail Is New Fodder for Climate Dispute. The New York Times. Global Edition: Environment. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

reason.com

Bailey, Ronald. The Scientific Tragedy of Climategate Reason. 1 December 2009

sciencemag.org

news.sciencemag.org

The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).

scientificamerican.com

Chameides, Bill. "Climategate Redux." Scientific American, 30 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2011.
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN 0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

scotsman.com

news.scotsman.com

Craig Brown, « The forecast for Scotland: wet, wet, wet », The Scotsman,‎ 8 février 2005 (lire en ligne, consulté le 1^er novembre 2008)

uea.ac.uk

cru.uea.ac.uk

(en) « About the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 30 avril 2008] (consulté le 9 mai 2008)
(en) « About the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 30 avril 2008] (consulté le 5 mai 2008)
(en) « History of the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 18 janvier 2017], Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia (consulté le 21 janvier 2017)
(en) « Data », sur CRU (consulté le 17 septembre 2015)
(en) « Temperature data (HadCRUT4) », sur CRU, 27 août 2015 (consulté le 17 septembre 2015)
(en) « High-resolution gridded datasets », sur CRU, 1^er septembre 2015 (consulté le 17 septembre 2015)
(en) « Climate Monitor Online » [archive du 4 juin 2009], 2004 (consulté le 27 novembre 2013)

uea.ac.uk

(en) « Tim Osborn to take over leadership of CRU », University of East Anglia, 21 décembre 2016 (consulté le 20 janvier 2017)
(en) « CRU Update 3 » [archive du 2 décembre 2014], 1^er décembre 2009 (consulté le 14 avril 2010)

web.archive.org

(en) « About the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 30 avril 2008] (consulté le 9 mai 2008)
(en) « Global temperature 2008: Another top-ten-year » [archive du 11 mai 2008], Met Office, 3 janvier 2008 (consulté le 1^er novembre 2008)
(en) « About the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 30 avril 2008] (consulté le 5 mai 2008)
(en) « History of the Climatic Research Unit » [archive du 18 janvier 2017], Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia (consulté le 21 janvier 2017)
(en) « CRU Update 3 » [archive du 2 décembre 2014], 1^er décembre 2009 (consulté le 14 avril 2010)
Michael McCarthy, « 'Conspiracy theories finally laid to rest' by report on leaked climate change emails », The Independent,‎ 8 juillet 2010 (lire en ligne [archive du 7 mars 2016], consulté le 20 janvier 2017)
(en) « Climate Monitor Online » [archive du 4 juin 2009], 2004 (consulté le 27 novembre 2013)
The six major investigations covered by secondary sources include: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (UK); Independent Climate Change Review (UK); International Science Assessment Panel (UK); Pennsylvania State University (US); United States Environmental Protection Agency (US); Department of Commerce (US).
Biello, David (Feb. 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. (ISSN 0036-8733). "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "... the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

wsj.com

Keith Johnson, « Climate Strife Comes to Light », The Wall Street Journal,‎ 23 novembre 2009 (lire en ligne)
Johnson, Keith. Climate Emails Stoke Debate The Wall Street Journal. 23 November 2009.