תיקון לחוק מכון הזיכרון הלאומי (Hebrew Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "תיקון לחוק מכון הזיכרון הלאומי" in Hebrew language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Hebrew rank
2nd place
10th place
34th place
94th place
5th place
31st place
497th place
159th place
12th place
47th place
1st place
6th place
571st place
145th place
749th place
9,543rd place
3rd place
33rd place
low place
low place
121st place
104th place
320th place
low place
28th place
71st place
699th place
936th place
low place
low place
4,878th place
low place
120th place
150th place
low place
low place
7,069th place
low place
low place
low place
1,870th place
472nd place
low place
low place
274th place
120th place
1,425th place
510th place
low place
6,266th place
1,840th place
1,580th place
low place
low place
49th place
105th place
115th place
500th place
low place
low place
low place
5,356th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
544th place
121st place
20th place
65th place
30th place
90th place
1,898th place
73rd place
406th place
621st place
low place
low place
1,554th place
2,116th place
low place
9,569th place
6,727th place
low place
324th place
5,236th place
1,757th place
299th place
low place
low place

academia.edu

  • Tsesis, Alexander (2020). "Genocide Censorship and Genocide Denial". In Grzebyk, Patrycja (ed.). Responsibility for Negation of International Crimes. Warsaw: Institute of Justice in Warsaw. p. 117. ISBN 9788366344433. Far more controversial than genocide denial laws, however, have been national efforts to censor evidence of complicity to commit genocide, and this is the case with civil legislation in Poland and the criminal law in Turkey... The newest version of the law, passed on June 6, 2019, continues to have a civil cause of action that can be brought by private citizens of the Law on Institute of National Remembrance (Art. 53o and 53p). The problem, then, has not been fully resolved, despite the 2019 changes, because defense of nationalistic honor continues to function as a censor on speech. The Law on Institute of National Remembrance is likely to have some of the same negative impacts as the Turkish censorship statute protecting national honor.
  • Tsesis, Alexander (2020). "Genocide Censorship and Genocide Denial". In Grzebyk, Patrycja (ed.). Responsibility for Negation of International Crimes. Warsaw: Institute of Justice in Warsaw. p. 117-118. ISBN 9788366344433.

bbc.com

books.google.com

brill.com

  • Belavusau, Uladzislau (12 בדצמבר 2018). "The Rise of Memory Laws in Poland: An Adequate Tool to Counter Historical Disinformation?". Security and Human Rights (באנגלית). 29 (1–4): 36–54. doi:10.1163/18750230-02901011. ISSN 1875-0230. The argument of the Polish government that all Western European countries have been legally protecting the memory of the Holocaust in the same way is at best misleading. The closest relative of the 2018 Law is not a standard provision in continental Europe's criminal codes about punitive measures against Holocaust deniers. Rather, the closest sibling of the Law are parts of the Turkish and Russian penal codes. The way the Law frames the defence of collective Polish dignity in a historical context is foremost reminiscent of the notorious provision in the Turkish criminal code (Article 301), which criminalises denigration of the Turkish nation and is particularly used to silence people speaking out against the massacres of Armenians and other minorities by the Ottoman Empire in 1915. {{cite journal}}: (עזרה)

cambridgeblog.org

  • Koposov, Nikolay (16 במרץ 2018). "Is Poland's New Memory Law a Case of Holocaust Denial?". fifteeneightyfour. Cambridge University Press. נבדק ב-3 בינואר 2021. the statute makes it illegal to claim that ethnic Poles were in any way involved in the Holocaust. According to Polish prime minister Mateusz Morawiecki, such claims are a form of Holocaust denial. But it is more accurate to say that the Polish law itself is a manifestation of Holocaust negationism. {{cite news}}: (עזרה)

cbc.ca

cbos.pl

cnn.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

degruyter.com

doi.org

  • Hackmann, Jörg (2018). "Defending the "Good Name" of the Polish Nation: Politics of History as a Battlefield in Poland, 2015–18". Journal of Genocide Research. 20 (4): 587–606. doi:10.1080/14623528.2018.1528742.
  • Soroka, George; Krawatzek, Félix (2019). "Nationalism, Democracy, and Memory Laws". Journal of Democracy (באנגלית). 30 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0032. ISSN 1086-3214.
  • Ray, Larry; Kapralski, Sławomir (2019). "Introduction to the special issue – disputed Holocaust memory in Poland". Holocaust Studies. 25 (3): 209–219. doi:10.1080/17504902.2019.1567657.
  • Cherviatsova, Alina (2020). "Memory as a battlefield: European memorial laws and freedom of speech". The International Journal of Human Rights. 25 (4): 675–694. doi:10.1080/13642987.2020.1791826.
  • Bucholc, Marta (2019). "Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015". Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. 11 (1): 85–110. doi:10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7.
  • Belavusau, Uladzislau (12 בדצמבר 2018). "The Rise of Memory Laws in Poland: An Adequate Tool to Counter Historical Disinformation?". Security and Human Rights (באנגלית). 29 (1–4): 36–54. doi:10.1163/18750230-02901011. ISSN 1875-0230. The argument of the Polish government that all Western European countries have been legally protecting the memory of the Holocaust in the same way is at best misleading. The closest relative of the 2018 Law is not a standard provision in continental Europe's criminal codes about punitive measures against Holocaust deniers. Rather, the closest sibling of the Law are parts of the Turkish and Russian penal codes. The way the Law frames the defence of collective Polish dignity in a historical context is foremost reminiscent of the notorious provision in the Turkish criminal code (Article 301), which criminalises denigration of the Turkish nation and is particularly used to silence people speaking out against the massacres of Armenians and other minorities by the Ottoman Empire in 1915. {{cite journal}}: (עזרה)
  • Cherviatsova, Alina (2020). "Memory as a battlefield: European memorial laws and freedom of speech". The International Journal of Human Rights. 25 (4): 675–694. doi:10.1080/13642987.2020.1791826. The Turkish, Russian, Polish and Ukrainian cases do not exhaust the list of historical discussions limited by memorial laws for the sake of glory of the past but nevertheless reflect a dangerous tendency towards the manipulative use of history, the rise of national populism and a precipitous decline in democratic values.
  • Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Grażyna Baranowska, Anna Wójcik (2019). "Law-Secured Narratives of the Past in Poland in Light of International Human Rights Law Standards". POLISH YEARBOOK OF International Law. doi:10.24425/pyil.2019.129606.{{cite journal}}: תחזוקה - ציטוט: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Grzebyk, Patrycja (2018). "Amendments of January 2018 to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation in Light of International Law". Polish Yearbook of International Law. 37: 287–300. doi:10.7420/pyil2017o.
  • Grzebyk, Patrycja (2018). "Amendments of January 2018 to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation in Light of International Law". Polish Yearbook of International Law. 37: 287–300. doi:10.7420/pyil2017o. As a result of the amendments, Ukrainians are the only national group directlymentioned in the Act as perpetrators of crimes, and the Act does not refer even toGermans or Russians but instead prefers to speak about crimes of the "Third Reich" or of the "communists." Not surprisingly, Ukrainians have felt offended by this "distinction."

dorzeczy.pl

dpceonline.it

dt.ua

dzieje.pl

dziennikustaw.gov.pl

haaretz.com

historians.org

jewish.org.pl

jewishcurrents.org

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

jpost.com

jta.org

politicalcritique.org

ukraine.politicalcritique.org

polskieradio24.pl

prnewswire.com

rada.gov.ua

w1.c1.rada.gov.ua

rcl.gov.pl

legislacja.rcl.gov.pl

researchgate.net

reuters.com

uk.reuters.com

rpo.gov.pl

sejm.gov.pl

sejm.gov.pl

orka.sejm.gov.pl

springer.com

link.springer.com

telegraph.co.uk

theguardian.com

thetablet.co.uk

timeshighereducation.com

timesofisrael.com

uni-jena.de

cultures-of-history.uni-jena.de

verfassungsblog.de

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

wp.pl

wiadomosci.wp.pl

yadvashem.org

ynetnews.com