תערו של היצ'נס (Hebrew Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "תערו של היצ'נס" in Hebrew language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Hebrew rank
3rd place
33rd place
105th place
325th place
low place
low place
6th place
48th place
low place
low place
7th place
32nd place
79th place
165th place

amazon.com

  • Hitchens, Christopher (6 באפריל 2009). God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Kindle ed.). Twelve Books. p. 258. ASIN B00287KD4Q. And remember, miracles are supposed to occur at the behest of a being who is omnipotent as well as omniscient and omnipresent. One might hope for more magnificent performances than ever seem to occur. The “evidence” for faith, then, seems to leave faith looking even weaker than it would if it stood, alone and unsupported, all by itself. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. This is even more true when the “evidence” eventually offered is so shoddy and self-interested. {{cite book}}: (עזרה)
  • Hitchens, Christopher (6 באפריל 2009). God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Kindle ed.). Twelve Books. p. 119. ASIN B00287KD4Q. [William Ockham] devised a 'principle of economy,' popularly known as 'Ockham’s razor,' which relied for its effect on disposing of unnecessary assumptions and accepting the first sufficient explanation or cause. 'Do not multiply entities beyond necessity.' This principle extends itself. 'Everything which is explained through positing something different from the act of understanding,' he wrote, 'can be explained without positing such a distinct thing.' {{cite book}}: (עזרה)

archive.org

  • Hitchens, Christopher (2007). God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York, NY: Twelve Books. p. 150. ISBN 978-1843545743.

books.google.com

nytimes.com

  • Kinsley, Michael (13 במאי 2007). "In God, Distrust". The New York Times. נבדק ב-21 באוגוסט 2021. Hitchens is attracted repeatedly to the principle of Occam's razor: that simple explanations are more likely to be correct than complicated ones. (E.g., Earth makes a circle around the Sun; the Sun doesn’t do a complex roller coaster ride around Earth.) You might think that Occam's razor would favor religion; the biblical creation story certainly seems simpler than evolution. But Hitchens argues effectively again and again that attaching the religious myth to what we know from science to be true adds nothing but needless complication. {{cite news}}: (עזרה)

rixaeton.blogspot.com

whyevolutionistrue.com

wsj.com

  • Melchior, Jillian (21 בספטמבר 2017). "Inside the Madness at Evergreen State". The Wall Street Journal. נבדק ב-19 ביוני 2019. Mr. Coffman cited Christopher Hitchens's variation of Occam's razor: 'What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without' [evidence] {{cite news}}: (עזרה)