जीएनयू फ्री डॉक्यूमेंटेशन लाइसेंस (Hindi Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "जीएनयू फ्री डॉक्यूमेंटेशन लाइसेंस" in Hindi language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Hindi rank
3,857th place
9,157th place
1st place
1st place
1,475th place
8,550th place
low place
2,315th place
low place
low place
14th place
26th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,824th place
low place
low place
1,317th place
1,215th place
4,423rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

archive.today (Global: 14th place; Hindi: 26th place)

debian.org (Global: 3,857th place; Hindi: 9,157th place)

lists.debian.org

  • Bruce Perens (2 Sep 2003). "stepping in between Debian and FSF". lists.debian.org/debian-legal. अभिगमन तिथि: 2016-03-20. FSF, a Free Software organization, isn't being entirely true to the Free Software ethos while it is promoting a license that allows invariant sections to be applied to anything but the license text and attribution. FSF is not Creative Commons:the documentation that FSF handles is an essential component of FSF's Free Software, and should be treated as such. In that light, the GFDL isn't consistent with the ethos that FSF has promoted for 19 years.
  • Richard Stallman (2003-09-06), Re: A possible GFDL compromise.
  • Richard Stallman, (2003-08-23), Re: A possible GFDL compromise.
  • Richard Braakman on Debian-legal about GFDL/GPL incompatibility

people.debian.org

  • Srivastava, Manoj (2006). "Draft Debian Position Statement about the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)". अभिगमन तिथि: 2007-09-25. It is not possible to borrow text from a GFDL'd manual and incorporate it in any free software program whatsoever. This is not a mere license incompatibility. It's not just that the GFDL is incompatible with this or that free software license: it's that it is fundamentally incompatible with any free software license whatsoever. So if you write a new program, and you have no commitments at all about what license you want to use, saving only that it be a free license, you cannot include GFDL'd text. The GNU FDL, as it stands today, does not meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines. There are significant problems with the license, as detailed above; and, as such, we cannot accept works licensed under the GNU FDL into our distribution.

debian.org

flossmanuals.net (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

en.flossmanuals.net

fsfe.org (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

gnu.org (Global: 1,475th place; Hindi: 8,550th place)

groklaw.net (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

lessig.org (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

lwn.net (Global: 4,423rd place; Hindi: low place)

notafish.com (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

notablog.notafish.com

pcworld.com (Global: 1,317th place; Hindi: 1,215th place)

rr.com (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

home.twcny.rr.com

tech-insider.org (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

  • "New Documentation License--Comments Requested". (Web link).

ups.edu (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

abstract.ups.edu

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Hindi: 1st place)

wikimediafoundation.org (Global: low place; Hindi: 4,824th place)

wikipedia.org (Global: low place; Hindi: 2,315th place)

en.wikipedia.org

  • "Wikipedia:About", Wikipedia (अंग्रेज़ी भाषा में), 2018-07-26, अभिगमन तिथि: 2018-09-07
  • "Wikipedia:Licensing update". 2009-06-14. With the transition, the Wikipedia community will now be allowed to import CC-BY-SA text from external sources into articles. If you do this, the origin of the material and its license should be explicitly noted in the edit summary. If the source text is dual- or multi-licensed, it is only necessary that at least one of the licenses is compatible with CC-BY-SA. It is not necessary that external content be dual licensed under the GFDL.

wikivoyage.org (Global: low place; Hindi: low place)

en.wikivoyage.org