EPR paradoks (Croatian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "EPR paradoks" in Croatian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Croatian rank
2nd place
12th place
18th place
130th place
low place
low place
222nd place
344th place
low place
low place
1,725th place
4,341st place
179th place
278th place
803rd place
356th place
1,503rd place
3,165th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,529th place
6,521st place
305th place
832nd place
1,697th place
7,849th place
low place
124th place

aps.org

link.aps.org

cambridge.org

doi.org

  • Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. 15. svibnja 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 47 (10): 777–780. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
  • Planck, M. 1901. Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum. Annalen der Physik. 309 (3): 553–563. doi:10.1002/andp.19013090310
  • Bohr, N. 15. listopada 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?. Physical Review. 48: 696–702. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
  • Bohm, David; Aharonov, Yahir. 15. studenoga 1957. Introduction (PDF). Physical Review. str. 1070–1076. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1070. Inačica izvorne stranice (PDF) arhivirana 19. ožujka 2015. Pristupljeno 9. siječnja 2017.. One could perhaps suppose that there is some hidden interaction between B and A, or between B and the measuring apparatus, which explains the above behavior. Such an interaction would, at the very least, be outside the scope of the current quantum theory. Moreover, it would have to be instantaneous, because the orientation of the measuring apparatus could very quickly be changed, and the spin of B would have to respond immediately to the change. Such an immediate interaction between distant systems would not in general be consistent with the theory of relativity. This result constitutes the essence of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky.
  • Clauser, John; Horne, Michael; Shimony, Abner; Holt, Richard. 1969. Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Physical Review Letters. 23 (15): 880–884. Bibcode:1969PhRvL..23..880C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
  • Aspect, Alain; Grangier, Philippe; Roger, Gérard. 12. srpnja 1982. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (91). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91

drchinese.com

  • Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. 15. svibnja 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 47 (10): 777–780. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. 15. svibnja 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 47 (10): 777–780. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
  • Clauser, John; Horne, Michael; Shimony, Abner; Holt, Richard. 1969. Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Physical Review Letters. 23 (15): 880–884. Bibcode:1969PhRvL..23..880C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

iop.org

iopscience.iop.org

kgz.hr

katalog.kgz.hr

marxists.org

scholar.google.com

scholarpedia.org

solvayinstitutes.be

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

unibas.ch

chemie.unibas.ch

  • Bohm, David; Aharonov, Yahir. 15. studenoga 1957. Introduction (PDF). Physical Review. str. 1070–1076. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1070. Inačica izvorne stranice (PDF) arhivirana 19. ožujka 2015. Pristupljeno 9. siječnja 2017.. One could perhaps suppose that there is some hidden interaction between B and A, or between B and the measuring apparatus, which explains the above behavior. Such an interaction would, at the very least, be outside the scope of the current quantum theory. Moreover, it would have to be instantaneous, because the orientation of the measuring apparatus could very quickly be changed, and the spin of B would have to respond immediately to the change. Such an immediate interaction between distant systems would not in general be consistent with the theory of relativity. This result constitutes the essence of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky.

univie.ac.at

homepage.univie.ac.at

web.archive.org

  • Bohm, David; Aharonov, Yahir. 15. studenoga 1957. Introduction (PDF). Physical Review. str. 1070–1076. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1070. Inačica izvorne stranice (PDF) arhivirana 19. ožujka 2015. Pristupljeno 9. siječnja 2017.. One could perhaps suppose that there is some hidden interaction between B and A, or between B and the measuring apparatus, which explains the above behavior. Such an interaction would, at the very least, be outside the scope of the current quantum theory. Moreover, it would have to be instantaneous, because the orientation of the measuring apparatus could very quickly be changed, and the spin of B would have to respond immediately to the change. Such an immediate interaction between distant systems would not in general be consistent with the theory of relativity. This result constitutes the essence of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com