Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Pokolj u Križančevu Selu" in Croatian language version.
|journal= (pomoć)Q. All right. Indeed, sir, that [Muslim offensive in late December, 1993] involved one particular incident involving the deaths of 60 or 70 Croats at Krizancevo Selo. Do you recall that? A. I do recall that.
Q. [...] There's also a reference to 60 or 70 HVO being killed by a surprise attack at Krizancevo Selo near Dubravica. Would it be fair to say, sir, that that event involving so many deaths raised some particularly hard feelings on the part of the Croats battling for their lives against this sustained assault? A. Indeed. There were immediate allegations that this was a massacre, and we followed this up later on, early in the new year, to investigate the situation.
Q. [...] You indicated that there was an investigation as to the allegations of massacre by the Croats -- Croats alleging massacre on the Croats. What conclusion was reached as to massacre? A. The elaborate investigation was taken -- was conducted at the spot where 27 of the bodies of those who had allegedly been killed were buried. We exhumed nine bodies in the presence of the BBC, amongst other people. To the best of our limited knowledge, they all appeared to be of military age and to have died in extreme traumatic ways, that we assessed as being in combat. We then interviewed three men who had been captured, who were in the gaol in Zenica, and we eventually presented a report, not only to the U.N. authorities, but also to the Croat military authorities in the Vitez pocket. Q. Then did your investigation sustain the allegations by the Croats? A. The investigation suggested that there was -- there was no evidence to support the theory of a massacre. The evidence pointed to a tactical success that had led to a considerable loss of life.
|journal= (pomoć)|journal= (pomoć)|journal= (pomoć)