Trošak električne energije po izvoru energije (Croatian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Trošak električne energije po izvoru energije" in Croatian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Croatian rank
1st place
1st place
2,290th place
7,760th place
low place
low place
2nd place
12th place
389th place
1,861st place
low place
7,882nd place
low place
low place
8th place
19th place
low place
low place
2,532nd place
1,260th place
102nd place
2,609th place
12th place
42nd place
155th place
343rd place
8,161st place
low place
7,696th place
low place
low place
low place
432nd place
3,805th place
low place
6,840th place
254th place
703rd place
121st place
78th place
low place
low place
415th place
962nd place
24th place
55th place
low place
low place
2,509th place
3,139th place
993rd place
1,668th place
low place
low place
2,121st place
9,432nd place
774th place
945th place
low place
low place
7,949th place
3,450th place
low place
6,734th place
68th place
35th place
1,778th place
1,295th place
1,168th place
1,073rd place
7,014th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
18th place
130th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,719th place
low place
9,857th place
231st place
61st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
87th place
105th place
66th place
427th place
30th place
113th place
406th place
604th place
low place
low place
421st place
1,047th place
9,466th place
low place
low place
low place
1,634th place
4,153rd place
149th place
327th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
712th place
1,620th place
low place
low place
49th place
93rd place
low place
low place
99th place
442nd place
low place
1,670th place
7,748th place
9,931st place
1,953rd place
1,114th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,418th place
8,223rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,081st place
2,116th place
1,668th place
1,569th place
1,241st place
675th place
7th place
28th place

academia.edu

archive.is

arquivo.pt

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

bloomberg.com

bnef.com

about.bnef.com

  • Tumbling Costs for Wind, Solar, Batteries Are Squeezing Fossil Fuels. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. London and New York. 28. ožujka 2018. Pristupljeno 28. srpnja 2018.. Latest BNEF study of comparative costs worldwide shows an 18% improvement in the competitiveness of onshore wind and solar in the last year, and new and rapidly developing roles for batteries.

brookings.edu

businessinsider.fr

businessweek.com

ca.gov

energy.ca.gov

cbo.gov

claverton-energy.com

cleantechnica.com

climatecouncil.org.au

damsafety.org

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

ebrd.com

economist.com

ecowatch.com

eia.gov

energy.gov

apps1.eere.energy.gov

energytrend.com

pv.energytrend.com

epia.org

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

externe.info

finanznachrichten.de

foes.de

fraunhofer.de

ise.fraunhofer.de

gov.uk

greentechmedia.com

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

environment.harvard.edu

helioscsp.com

iaea.org

iea.org

iesisenergy.org

industry.gov.au

ipcc.ch

irena.org

  • Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Abu Dhabi. Siječanj 2018. ISBN 978-92-9260-040-2. Pristupljeno 14. lipnja 2018.. The trend is clear: by 2020, all mainstream renewable power generation technologies can be expected to provide average costs at the lower end of the fossil-fuel cost range. In addition, several solar PV and wind power projects will provide some of the lowest-cost electricity from any source.

japantimes.co.jp

search.japantimes.co.jp

lazard.com

lbl.gov

ees.lbl.gov

mit.edu

economics.mit.edu

moodys.com

nationalinterest.org

newscientist.com

norwea.no

nrel.gov

nytimes.com

openei.org

en.openei.org

powerengineeringint.com

prnewswire.com

pv-tech.org

renewableenergyworld.com

reneweconomy.com.au

reuters.com

rmi.org

blog.rmi.org

  • Bronski, Peter. 29. svibnja 2014. You Down With LCOE? Maybe You, But Not Me:Leaving behind the limitations of levelized cost of energy for a better energy metric. RMI Outlet. Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). Inačica izvorne stranice arhivirana 28. listopada 2016. Pristupljeno 28. listopada 2016.. Desirable shifts in how we as a nation and as individual consumers—whether a residential home or commercial real estate property—manage, produce, and consume electricity can actually make LCOE numbers look worse, not better. This is particularly true when considering the influence of energy efficiency...If you’re planning a new, big central power plant, you want to get the best value (i.e., lowest LCOE) possible. For the cost of any given power-generating asset, that comes through maximizing the number of kWh it cranks out over its economic lifetime, which runs exactly counter to the highly cost-effective energy efficiency that has been a driving force behind the country’s flat and even declining electricity demand. On the flip side, planning new big, central power plants without taking continued energy efficiency gains (of which there’s no shortage of opportunity—the February 2014 UNEP Finance Initiative report Commercial Real Estate: Unlocking the energy efficiency retrofit investment opportunity identified a $231–$300 billion annual market by 2020) into account risks overestimating the number of kWh we’d need from them and thus lowballing their LCOE... If I’m a homeowner or business considering purchasing rooftop solar outright, do I care more about the per-unit value (LCOE) or my total out of pocket (lifetime system cost)?...The per-unit value is less important than the thing considered as a whole...LCOE, for example, fails to take into account the time of day during which an asset can produce power, where it can be installed on the grid, and its carbon intensity, among many other variables. That’s why, in addition to [levelized avoided cost of energy (LACE)], utilities and other electricity system stakeholders...have used benefit/cost calculations and/or an asset’s capacity value or contribution to peak on a system or circuit level.

sciencedaily.com

sciencedirect.com

seenews.com

renewables.seenews.com

solarserver.de

spiegel.de

telegraph.co.uk

theconversation.edu.au

theguardian.com

tufts.edu

sustainability.tufts.edu

ucsusa.org

ukerc.ac.uk

  • A Review of Electricity Unit Cost Estimates Working Paper, December 2006 – Updated May 2007 Arhivirana kopija (PDF). Inačica izvorne stranice (PDF) arhivirana 8. siječnja 2010. Pristupljeno 30. siječnja 2019. journal zahtijeva |journal= (pomoć)CS1 održavanje: arhivirana kopija u naslovu (link)

umweltbundesamt.de

uni-stuttgart.de

ier.uni-stuttgart.de

utilitydive.com

vattenfall.com

corporate.vattenfall.com

wa.gov

ecy.wa.gov

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

  • Bronski, Peter. 29. svibnja 2014. You Down With LCOE? Maybe You, But Not Me:Leaving behind the limitations of levelized cost of energy for a better energy metric. RMI Outlet. Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). Inačica izvorne stranice arhivirana 28. listopada 2016. Pristupljeno 28. listopada 2016.. Desirable shifts in how we as a nation and as individual consumers—whether a residential home or commercial real estate property—manage, produce, and consume electricity can actually make LCOE numbers look worse, not better. This is particularly true when considering the influence of energy efficiency...If you’re planning a new, big central power plant, you want to get the best value (i.e., lowest LCOE) possible. For the cost of any given power-generating asset, that comes through maximizing the number of kWh it cranks out over its economic lifetime, which runs exactly counter to the highly cost-effective energy efficiency that has been a driving force behind the country’s flat and even declining electricity demand. On the flip side, planning new big, central power plants without taking continued energy efficiency gains (of which there’s no shortage of opportunity—the February 2014 UNEP Finance Initiative report Commercial Real Estate: Unlocking the energy efficiency retrofit investment opportunity identified a $231–$300 billion annual market by 2020) into account risks overestimating the number of kWh we’d need from them and thus lowballing their LCOE... If I’m a homeowner or business considering purchasing rooftop solar outright, do I care more about the per-unit value (LCOE) or my total out of pocket (lifetime system cost)?...The per-unit value is less important than the thing considered as a whole...LCOE, for example, fails to take into account the time of day during which an asset can produce power, where it can be installed on the grid, and its carbon intensity, among many other variables. That’s why, in addition to [levelized avoided cost of energy (LACE)], utilities and other electricity system stakeholders...have used benefit/cost calculations and/or an asset’s capacity value or contribution to peak on a system or circuit level.

whitehouse.gov

worldbank.org

live.worldbank.org