See also this collection of full-text peer reviewed scholarly articles on this subject by Radcliff and colleagues (from "Social Forces," "The Journal of Politics," and "Perspectives on Politics," among others) [1]Archiválva 2015. július 12-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben.
Inge, W.R.. Lay Thoughts of a Dean. Creative Media Partners, LLC (1926). ISBN 978-1379053095 „Looking back, I think I can separate the years when I was happy and those when I was unhappy. But perhaps at the time I should have judged differently.”
Essay entitled 'Happy People', dated 1921, included in Inge, W.R.. Lay Thoughts of a Dean. Garden City Publishing Company, 211. o. (1926)
(2008. október 1.) „Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia”. The Journal of Positive Psychology3 (4), 219–233. o. DOI:10.1080/17439760802303044.
(2008. augusztus 1.) „The Long Slide to Happiness”. Journal of Philosophy of Education42 (3–4), 559–573. o. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00650.x.
(2019. október 18.) „Lay Conceptions of Happiness: Associations With Reported Well-Being, Personality Traits, and Materialism”. Frontiers in Psychology10, 2377. o. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02377. PMID 31681129.
„World Happiness Report 2015”. „Some have argued that it is misleading to use 'happiness' as a generic term to cover subjective well-being more generally. While 'subjective well-being' is more precise, it simply does not have the convening power of 'happiness'. The main linguistic argument for using happiness in a broader generic role is that happiness plays two important roles within the science of well-being, appearing once as a prototypical positive emotion and again as part of a cognitive life evaluation question. This double use has sometimes been used to argue that there is no coherent structure to happiness responses. The converse argument made in the World Happiness Reports is that this double usage helps to justify using happiness in a generic role, as long as the alternative meanings are clearly understood and credibly related. Evidence from a growing number of large scale surveys shows that the answers to questions asking about the emotion of happiness differ from answers to judgmental questions asking about a person's happiness with life as a whole in exactly the ways that theory would suggest. Answers to questions about the emotion of happiness relate well to what is happening at the moment. Evaluative answers, in response to questions about life as a whole, are supported by positive emotions, as noted above, but also driven much more, than are answers to questions about emotions, by a variety of life circumstances, including income, health and social trust.” quoted in Helliwell, John F. (2017. február 25.). „What's Special About Happiness as a Social Indicator?”. Social Indicators Research135 (3), 965–968. o, Kiadó: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. DOI:10.1007/s11205-017-1549-9. ISSN0303-8300.
Hoerger, Michael (2010. augusztus 1.). „Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors”. Judgment and Decision Making5 (5), 365–373. o. DOI:10.1017/S1930297500002163. PMID 21912580.
(1999. február 1.) „A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation”. Social Indicators Research46 (2), 137–155. o. DOI:10.1023/A:1006824100041.
(2014. november 1.) „Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Version of the Cantril Ladder for Use with Adolescent Samples”. Social Indicators Research119 (2), 1047–1063. o. DOI:10.1007/s11205-013-0507-4.
(2013. november 1.) „Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life”. The Journal of Positive Psychology8 (6), 505–516. o. DOI:10.1080/17439760.2013.830764.
(1987. augusztus 1.) „Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: Longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample”. British Journal of Psychology78 (3), 299–306. o. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02248.x. PMID 3620790.
(2011. július 1.) „The Ordinary Concept of Happiness (and Others Like It)”. Emotion Review3 (3), 320–322. o. DOI:10.1177/1754073911402385.
(2021. január 1.) „Helping and Happiness: A Review and Guide for Public Policy”. Social Issues and Policy Review15 (1), 3–34. o. DOI:10.1111/sipr.12069.
(2020. december 1.) „Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being.”. Psychological Bulletin146 (12), 1084–1116. o. DOI:10.1037/bul0000298. PMID 32881540.
(2018. május 1.) „Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology76, 320–329. o. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014.
(2006) „Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction”. Journal of Happiness Studies9 (1), 1–11. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.
(2021. február 1.) „The neuroscience of positive emotions and affect: Implications for cultivating happiness and wellbeing”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews121, 220–249. o. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.002. PMID 33307046.
(2008. július 1.) „Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007)”. Perspectives on Psychological Science3 (4), 264–285. o. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x. PMID 26158947.
Cultural Evolution: People's Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108613880 (2018. augusztus 7.). ISBN 978-1108613880
(2013. február 8.) „Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies”. BMC Public Health13 (1), 119. o. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-119. PMID 23390882.
(2008) „Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care”. Journal of Happiness Studies9 (3), 449–469. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-006-9042-1.
(2011. augusztus 7.) „Can Seeking Happiness Make People Happy? Paradoxical Effects of Valuing Happiness”. Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. PMID 21517168.
(2011. augusztus 1.) „Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness”. Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. PMID 21517168.
(2011. augusztus 1.) „Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness.” (angol nyelven). Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. ISSN1931-1516. PMID 21517168.
(2012) „Mixed Emotional Experience is Associated with and Precedes Improvements in Psychological Well-Being”. PLOS ONE7 (4), e35633. o. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0035633. PMID 22539987.
(2013. január 1.) „When Feeling Bad Can Be Good: Mixed Emotions Benefit Physical Health Across Adulthood”. Social Psychological and Personality Science4 (1), 54–61. o. DOI:10.1177/1948550612444616. PMID 24032072.
(2015. november 20.) „The structural neural substrate of subjective happiness”. Scientific Reports5, 16891. o. DOI:10.1038/srep16891. PMID 26586449.
(2016. június 1.) „Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses”. Nature Genetics48 (6), 624–633. o. DOI:10.1038/ng.3552. PMID 27089181.
(2015. március 1.) „Genetics of Wellbeing and Its Components Satisfaction with Life, Happiness, and Quality of Life: A Review and Meta-analysis of Heritability Studies”. Behavior Genetics45 (2), 137–156. o. DOI:10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y. PMID 25715755.
(2017. április 1.) „A Genetic Component to National Differences in Happiness”. Journal of Happiness Studies18 (2), 321–340. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-015-9712-y.
Bartels, Boomsma, Meike, Dorret I. (2009. szeptember 3.). „Born to be Happy? The Etiology of Subjective Well-Being”. Behavior Genetics39 (6), 605–615. o. DOI:10.1007/s10519-009-9294-8. PMID 19728071.
(2017. október 1.) „Happiness in Behaviour Genetics: An Update on Heritability and Changeability”. Journal of Happiness Studies18 (5), 1533–1552. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-016-9781-6.
(2014. április 1.) „Eastern Conceptualizations of Happiness: Fundamental Differences with Western Views”. Journal of Happiness Studies15 (2), 475–493. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-013-9431-1. Sablon:ProQuest.
(2016. május 1.) „Individualism as the moderator of the relationship between hedonism and happiness: A study in 19 nations”. Personality and Individual Differences94, 149–152. o. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.025.
(2014. június 1.) „Aversion to Happiness Across Cultures: A Review of Where and Why People are Averse to Happiness”. Journal of Happiness Studies15 (3), 717–735. o. DOI:10.1007/s10902-013-9489-9.
Utilitarianism. Longmans, Green, and Co. (1879. augusztus 7.)
"The enjoyments of life (such was now my theory) are sufficient to make it a pleasant thing, when they are taken en passant, without being made a principal object. Once make them so, and they are immediately felt to be insufficient. They will not bear a scrutinizing examination. Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so. The only chance is to treat, not happiness, but some end external to it, as the purpose of life. Let your self-consciousness, your scrutiny, your self-interrogation, exhaust themselves on that; and if otherwise fortunately circumstanced you will inhale happiness with the air you breathe, without dwelling on it or thinking about it, without either forestalling it in imagination, or putting it to flight by fatal questioning. This theory now became the basis of my philosophy of life. And I still hold to it as the best theory for all those who have but a moderate degree of sensibility and of capacity for enjoyment; that is, for the great majority of mankind." Autobiography, Ch 5, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10378/10378-h/10378-h.htm#link2H_NOTEhttps://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/auto/auto.c05.html
"Some people are born happy. No matter what their circumstances are they are joyous, content and satisfied with everything. They carry a perpetual holiday in their eye and see joy and beauty everywhere. When we meet them they impress us as just having met with some good luck, or that they have some good news to tell you. Like the bees that extract honey from every flower, they have a happy alchemy which transmutes even gloom into sunshine." How To Succeed, (1896) https://www.gutenberg.org/files/20513/20513-h/20513-h.htm
(2019. október 18.) „Lay Conceptions of Happiness: Associations With Reported Well-Being, Personality Traits, and Materialism”. Frontiers in Psychology10, 2377. o. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02377. PMID 31681129.
Hoerger, Michael (2010. augusztus 1.). „Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors”. Judgment and Decision Making5 (5), 365–373. o. DOI:10.1017/S1930297500002163. PMID 21912580.
(1987. augusztus 1.) „Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: Longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample”. British Journal of Psychology78 (3), 299–306. o. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02248.x. PMID 3620790.
(2020. december 1.) „Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being.”. Psychological Bulletin146 (12), 1084–1116. o. DOI:10.1037/bul0000298. PMID 32881540.
(2021. február 1.) „The neuroscience of positive emotions and affect: Implications for cultivating happiness and wellbeing”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews121, 220–249. o. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.002. PMID 33307046.
(2008. július 1.) „Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007)”. Perspectives on Psychological Science3 (4), 264–285. o. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00078.x. PMID 26158947.
(2013. február 8.) „Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies”. BMC Public Health13 (1), 119. o. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-119. PMID 23390882.
(2011. augusztus 7.) „Can Seeking Happiness Make People Happy? Paradoxical Effects of Valuing Happiness”. Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. PMID 21517168.
(2011. augusztus 1.) „Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness”. Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. PMID 21517168.
(2011. augusztus 1.) „Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness.” (angol nyelven). Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. ISSN1931-1516. PMID 21517168.
(2012) „Mixed Emotional Experience is Associated with and Precedes Improvements in Psychological Well-Being”. PLOS ONE7 (4), e35633. o. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0035633. PMID 22539987.
(2013. január 1.) „When Feeling Bad Can Be Good: Mixed Emotions Benefit Physical Health Across Adulthood”. Social Psychological and Personality Science4 (1), 54–61. o. DOI:10.1177/1948550612444616. PMID 24032072.
(2015. november 20.) „The structural neural substrate of subjective happiness”. Scientific Reports5, 16891. o. DOI:10.1038/srep16891. PMID 26586449.
(2016. június 1.) „Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses”. Nature Genetics48 (6), 624–633. o. DOI:10.1038/ng.3552. PMID 27089181.
(2015. március 1.) „Genetics of Wellbeing and Its Components Satisfaction with Life, Happiness, and Quality of Life: A Review and Meta-analysis of Heritability Studies”. Behavior Genetics45 (2), 137–156. o. DOI:10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y. PMID 25715755.
Bartels, Boomsma, Meike, Dorret I. (2009. szeptember 3.). „Born to be Happy? The Etiology of Subjective Well-Being”. Behavior Genetics39 (6), 605–615. o. DOI:10.1007/s10519-009-9294-8. PMID 19728071.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/Archiválva 2018. június 11-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben. 2011, "'Happiness' is often used, in ordinary life, to refer to a short-lived state of a person, frequently a feeling of contentment: 'You look happy today'; 'I'm very happy for you'. Philosophically, its scope is more often wider, encompassing a whole life. And in philosophy it is possible to speak of the happiness of a person's life, or of their happy life, even if that person was in fact usually pretty miserable. The point is that some good things in their life made it a happy one, even though they lacked contentment. But this usage is uncommon, and may cause confusion.' https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/Archiválva 2018. október 25-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben. 2017
"The enjoyments of life (such was now my theory) are sufficient to make it a pleasant thing, when they are taken en passant, without being made a principal object. Once make them so, and they are immediately felt to be insufficient. They will not bear a scrutinizing examination. Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so. The only chance is to treat, not happiness, but some end external to it, as the purpose of life. Let your self-consciousness, your scrutiny, your self-interrogation, exhaust themselves on that; and if otherwise fortunately circumstanced you will inhale happiness with the air you breathe, without dwelling on it or thinking about it, without either forestalling it in imagination, or putting it to flight by fatal questioning. This theory now became the basis of my philosophy of life. And I still hold to it as the best theory for all those who have but a moderate degree of sensibility and of capacity for enjoyment; that is, for the great majority of mankind." Autobiography, Ch 5, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10378/10378-h/10378-h.htm#link2H_NOTEhttps://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/mill/auto/auto.c05.html
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/Archiválva 2018. június 11-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben. 2011, "'Happiness' is often used, in ordinary life, to refer to a short-lived state of a person, frequently a feeling of contentment: 'You look happy today'; 'I'm very happy for you'. Philosophically, its scope is more often wider, encompassing a whole life. And in philosophy it is possible to speak of the happiness of a person's life, or of their happy life, even if that person was in fact usually pretty miserable. The point is that some good things in their life made it a happy one, even though they lacked contentment. But this usage is uncommon, and may cause confusion.' https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/Archiválva 2018. október 25-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben. 2017
See also this collection of full-text peer reviewed scholarly articles on this subject by Radcliff and colleagues (from "Social Forces," "The Journal of Politics," and "Perspectives on Politics," among others) [1]Archiválva 2015. július 12-i dátummal a Wayback Machine-ben.
Wordnet 3.0 (accessed 2011-Feb-24 via Wolfram Alpha)
worldcat.org
„World Happiness Report 2015”. „Some have argued that it is misleading to use 'happiness' as a generic term to cover subjective well-being more generally. While 'subjective well-being' is more precise, it simply does not have the convening power of 'happiness'. The main linguistic argument for using happiness in a broader generic role is that happiness plays two important roles within the science of well-being, appearing once as a prototypical positive emotion and again as part of a cognitive life evaluation question. This double use has sometimes been used to argue that there is no coherent structure to happiness responses. The converse argument made in the World Happiness Reports is that this double usage helps to justify using happiness in a generic role, as long as the alternative meanings are clearly understood and credibly related. Evidence from a growing number of large scale surveys shows that the answers to questions asking about the emotion of happiness differ from answers to judgmental questions asking about a person's happiness with life as a whole in exactly the ways that theory would suggest. Answers to questions about the emotion of happiness relate well to what is happening at the moment. Evaluative answers, in response to questions about life as a whole, are supported by positive emotions, as noted above, but also driven much more, than are answers to questions about emotions, by a variety of life circumstances, including income, health and social trust.” quoted in Helliwell, John F. (2017. február 25.). „What's Special About Happiness as a Social Indicator?”. Social Indicators Research135 (3), 965–968. o, Kiadó: Springer Science and Business Media LLC. DOI:10.1007/s11205-017-1549-9. ISSN0303-8300.
(2011. augusztus 1.) „Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness.” (angol nyelven). Emotion11 (4), 807–815. o. DOI:10.1037/a0022010. ISSN1931-1516. PMID 21517168.
(2012) „World Happiness Report 2012”, 11. o. „How does happiness come into this classification? For better or worse, it enters in three ways. It is sometimes used as a current emotional report – "How happy are you now?," sometimes as a remembered emotion, as in "How happy were you yesterday?," and very often as a form of life evaluation, as in "How happy are you with your life as a whole these days?" People answer these three types of happiness question differently, so it is important to keep track of what is being asked. The good news is that the answers differ in ways that suggest that people understand what they are being asked, and answer appropriately”
FAQ. [2018. december 31-i dátummal az eredetiből archiválva]. (Hozzáférés: 2019. január 27.)
