Statisztikai hipotézisvizsgálat (Hungarian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Statisztikai hipotézisvizsgálat" in Hungarian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Hungarian rank

5archive.org

6^th place

14^th place

4doi.org

2^nd place

8^th place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

28^th place

1randomservices.org

low place

1nih.gov

4^th place

11^th place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

1,121^st place

1york.ac.uk

7,670^th place

low place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1xu.edu

low place

1bnf.fr

124^th place

33^rd place

1wikisource.org

27^th place

254^th place

1nap.edu

2,128^th place

3,177^th place

archive.org

Burnham, K. P.. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd, Springer-Verlag (2002). ISBN 978-0-387-95364-9
Triola, Mario. Elementary statistics, 8, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 388. o. (2001). ISBN 978-0-201-61477-0
Bakan (1966). „The test of significance in psychological research”. Psychological Bulletin 66 (6), 423–437. o. DOI:10.1037/h0020412. PMID 5974619.
Huff, Darrell. How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton (1993). ISBN 978-0-393-31072-6
Stigler, Stephen M.. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 134. o. (1986). ISBN 978-0-674-40340-6

bnf.fr

gallica.bnf.fr

Laplace, P.. Mémoire sur les probabilités (XIX, XX), Oeuvres complètes de Laplace, 429–438. o. (1778)

books.google.com

Stigler, Stephen M.. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Harvard University Press, 225–226. o. (1986). ISBN 978-0-67440341-3
Fisher, Sir Ronald A..szerk.: James Roy Newman: Mathematics of a Lady Tasting Tea, The World of Mathematics, volume 3. Courier Dover Publications [1935] (1956). ISBN 978-0-486-41151-4 Originally from Fisher's book Design of Experiments.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Nuzzo (2014. május 23.). „Scientific method: Statistical errors”. Nature 506 (7487), 150–152. o. DOI:10.1038/506150a.
Bakan (1966). „The test of significance in psychological research”. Psychological Bulletin 66 (6), 423–437. o. DOI:10.1037/h0020412. PMID 5974619.
Hubbard, R. (1997). „The Spread of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology: The Case of the Journal of Applied Psychology”. Theory and Psychology 7 (4), 545–554. o. DOI:10.1177/0959354397074006.
John Arbuthnot (1710). „An argument for Divine Providence, taken from the constant regularity observed in the births of both sexes”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 27 (325–336), 186–190. o. DOI:10.1098/rstl.1710.0011.

nap.edu

Kaye, David H.. Reference Guide on Statistics, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd, Eagan, MN Washington, D.C: West National Academies Press, 259. o. (2011). ISBN 978-0-309-21421-6

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Bakan (1966). „The test of significance in psychological research”. Psychological Bulletin 66 (6), 423–437. o. DOI:10.1037/h0020412. PMID 5974619.

randomservices.org

Siegrist: Hypothesis Testing - Introduction (angol nyelven). www.randomservices.org. (Hozzáférés: 2018. március 8.)

upenn.edu

www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu

"Over the last fifty years, How to Lie with Statistics has sold more copies than any other statistical text." J. M. Steele. ""Darrell Huff and Fifty Years of How to Lie with Statistics". Statistical Science, 20 (3), 2005, 205–209.

web.archive.org

Laplace (1778). „Mémoire sur les probabilités”. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris 9, 227–332. o. [2015. április 27-i dátummal az eredetiből archiválva]. (Hozzáférés: 2019. december 22.)

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

C. S. Peirce (1878. augusztus 1.). „Illustrations of the Logic of Science VI: Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis”. Popular Science Monthly 13. (Hozzáférés: 2012. március 30.)

xu.edu

cerebro.xu.edu

Laplace (1778). „Mémoire sur les probabilités”. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris 9, 227–332. o. [2015. április 27-i dátummal az eredetiből archiválva]. (Hozzáférés: 2019. december 22.)

york.ac.uk

John Arbuthnot (1710). „An argument for Divine Providence, taken from the constant regularity observed in the births of both sexes”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 27 (325–336), 186–190. o. DOI:10.1098/rstl.1710.0011.