Többségi vesztes kritérium (Hungarian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Többségi vesztes kritérium" in Hungarian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Hungarian rank

2^nd place

8^th place

5^th place

22^nd place

doi.org

Lepelley (1998. november 4.). „Choix social positionnel et principe majoritaire”. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique (51), 29–48. o. DOI:10.2307/20076136.
Sertel (1999. szeptember 1.). „The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable” (angol nyelven). Social Choice and Welfare 16 (4), 615–627. o. DOI:10.1007/s003550050164. ISSN 0176-1714.
Kondratev (2020). „Measuring Majority Power and Veto Power of Voting Rules”. Public Choice 183 (1–2), 187–210. o. DOI:10.1007/s11127-019-00697-1.
Sanver (2002. március 1.). „Scoring rules cannot respect majority in choice and elimination simultaneously”. Mathematical Social Sciences 43 (2), 151–155. o. DOI:10.1016/S0165-4896(01)00087-7.
Woeginger (2003. december 1.). „A note on scoring rules that respect majority in choice and elimination”. Mathematical Social Sciences 46 (3), 347–354. o. DOI:10.1016/S0165-4896(03)00050-7.

Sertel (1999. szeptember 1.). „The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable” (angol nyelven). Social Choice and Welfare 16 (4), 615–627. o. DOI:10.1007/s003550050164. ISSN 0176-1714.