Swing (Armenian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Swing" in Armenian language version.

Last modified: 06:47:05, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank Armenian rank

1^st place

2,532^nd place

3,395^th place

low place

low place

cosylab.com (Global: low place; Armenian: low place)

Žagar, Klemen; Križnar, Igor (2006 թ․ մարտի 3). «SWT Vs. Swing Performance Comparison» (PDF) (1.4 ed.). Cosylab. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից (PDF) 2015 թ․ մայիսի 26-ին. «It is hard to give a rule-of-thumb where SWT would outperform Swing, or vice versa. In some environments (e.g., Windows), SWT is a winner. In others (Linux, VMware hosting Windows), Swing and its redraw optimization outperform SWT significantly. Differences in performance are significant: factors of 2 and more are common, in either direction.»

Strenn, Stephen (2006 թ․ մարտի 3). «Swing vs. SWT Performance - Have a Look at the Call Stacks». Javalobby. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2017 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 17-ին.

How to Set the Look and Feel Արխիվացված 2011-08-28 Wayback Machine (The Java™ Tutorials > Creating a GUI With JFC/Swing > Modifying the Look and Feel)

How to Set the Look and Feel Արխիվացված 2011-08-28 Wayback Machine (The Java™ Tutorials > Creating a GUI With JFC/Swing > Modifying the Look and Feel)
Strenn, Stephen (2006 թ․ մարտի 3). «Swing vs. SWT Performance - Have a Look at the Call Stacks». Javalobby. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2017 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 17-ին.
Žagar, Klemen; Križnar, Igor (2006 թ․ մարտի 3). «SWT Vs. Swing Performance Comparison» (PDF) (1.4 ed.). Cosylab. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից (PDF) 2015 թ․ մայիսի 26-ին. «It is hard to give a rule-of-thumb where SWT would outperform Swing, or vice versa. In some environments (e.g., Windows), SWT is a winner. In others (Linux, VMware hosting Windows), Swing and its redraw optimization outperform SWT significantly. Differences in performance are significant: factors of 2 and more are common, in either direction.»