«Photographers' Rights». aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 9 May 2018-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties. Unfortunately, law enforcement officers have been known to ask people to stop taking photographs of public places. Those who fail to comply have sometimes been harassed, detained, and arrested. Other people have ended up in FBI databases for taking innocuous photographs of public places.»
Mill, John Stuart (1859). «Introductory». On Liberty (4th ed.). London: Longman, Roberts & Green (published 1869). para. 5. «Society can and does execute its own mandates ... it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough...»
Sandbrook, Dominic (16 October 2010). «Lady Chatterley trial - 50 years on. The filthy book that set us free and fettered us forever». The Telegraph. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 11 January 2022-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Though few then could have realised it, a tiny but unmistakeable line runs from the novel Lawrence wrote in the late 1920s to an international pornography industry today worth more than £26 billion a year. Now that public obscenity has become commonplace, it is hard to recapture the atmosphere of a society that saw fit to ban books such as Lady Chatterley's Lover because it was likely to "deprave and corrupt" its readers. Although only half a century separates us from Harold Macmillan's Britain, the world of 1960 can easily seem like ancient history. In a Britain when men still wore heavy grey suits, working women were still relatively rare and the Empire was still, just, a going concern, D H Lawrence's book was merely one of many banned because of its threat to public morality.»
Kaplan, Fred (20 July 2009). «The Day Obscenity Became Art». The New York Times. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 13 June 2018-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «TODAY is the 50th anniversary of the court ruling that overturned America's obscenity laws, setting off an explosion of free speech — and also, in retrospect, splashing cold water on the idea, much discussed during Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, that judges are "umpires" rather than agents of social change.»
«Article 19». International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976. 1976 թ․ մարտի 23. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2008 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ մարտի 13-ին.
Wragg, Paul (2015). «Free Speech Rights at Work: Resolving the Differences between Practice and Liberal Principle»(PDF). Industrial Law Journal. Oxford University Press. 44 (1): 11. «Comparison may be made between Mill's 'tyrannical majority' and the employer who dismisses an employee for expression that it dislikes on moral grounds. The protection of employer action in these circumstances evokes Mill's concern about state tolerance of coercive means to ensure conformity with orthodox moral viewpoints and so nullify unorthodox ones.» {{cite journal}}: Invalid |url-access=yes (օգնություն)
«The index of expurgations». "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 8 September 2012-ին. Վերցված է 26 June 2011-ին.
Nelson, Fraser (24 November 2012). «David Blunkert warns MPs against regulating the Press». The Spectator. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 19 October 2017-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Jeremy Paxman famously said he went into journalism after hearing that the relationship between a journalist and a politician was akin to that of a dog and a lamppost. Several MPs now want to replace this with a principle whereby MPs define the parameters under which the press operates – and "work together". It is a hideous idea that must be resisted. The last time this happened was under the Licensing Order of 1643, which was allowed to expire in 1695 after the introduction of the 1688 Bill of Rights shortly after the Glorious Revolution. As I wrote in my Daily Telegraph column yesterday, it's amazing that so many Tory MPs should want to turn the clock back 300 years.»
Rayner, Gordon (7 October 2011). «Leveson Inquiry: British press freedom is a model for the world, editor tells inquiry». The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 7 October 2011-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Mr Rusbridger said: "When people talk about licensing journalists or newspapers the instinct should be to refer them to history. Read about how licensing of the press in Britain was abolished in 1695.»
Sandbrook, Dominic (16 October 2010). «Lady Chatterley trial - 50 years on. The filthy book that set us free and fettered us forever». The Telegraph. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 11 January 2022-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Though few then could have realised it, a tiny but unmistakeable line runs from the novel Lawrence wrote in the late 1920s to an international pornography industry today worth more than £26 billion a year. Now that public obscenity has become commonplace, it is hard to recapture the atmosphere of a society that saw fit to ban books such as Lady Chatterley's Lover because it was likely to "deprave and corrupt" its readers. Although only half a century separates us from Harold Macmillan's Britain, the world of 1960 can easily seem like ancient history. In a Britain when men still wore heavy grey suits, working women were still relatively rare and the Empire was still, just, a going concern, D H Lawrence's book was merely one of many banned because of its threat to public morality.»
«Article 19». International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976. 1976 թ․ մարտի 23. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2008 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ մարտի 13-ին.
«The index of expurgations». "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 8 September 2012-ին. Վերցված է 26 June 2011-ին.
Rayner, Gordon (7 October 2011). «Leveson Inquiry: British press freedom is a model for the world, editor tells inquiry». The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 7 October 2011-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Mr Rusbridger said: "When people talk about licensing journalists or newspapers the instinct should be to refer them to history. Read about how licensing of the press in Britain was abolished in 1695.»
Nelson, Fraser (24 November 2012). «David Blunkert warns MPs against regulating the Press». The Spectator. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 19 October 2017-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Jeremy Paxman famously said he went into journalism after hearing that the relationship between a journalist and a politician was akin to that of a dog and a lamppost. Several MPs now want to replace this with a principle whereby MPs define the parameters under which the press operates – and "work together". It is a hideous idea that must be resisted. The last time this happened was under the Licensing Order of 1643, which was allowed to expire in 1695 after the introduction of the 1688 Bill of Rights shortly after the Glorious Revolution. As I wrote in my Daily Telegraph column yesterday, it's amazing that so many Tory MPs should want to turn the clock back 300 years.»
Kaplan, Fred (20 July 2009). «The Day Obscenity Became Art». The New York Times. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 13 June 2018-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «TODAY is the 50th anniversary of the court ruling that overturned America's obscenity laws, setting off an explosion of free speech — and also, in retrospect, splashing cold water on the idea, much discussed during Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, that judges are "umpires" rather than agents of social change.»
«Photographers' Rights». aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 9 May 2018-ին. Վերցված է 9 May 2018-ին. «Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties. Unfortunately, law enforcement officers have been known to ask people to stop taking photographs of public places. Those who fail to comply have sometimes been harassed, detained, and arrested. Other people have ended up in FBI databases for taking innocuous photographs of public places.»
