Մոլորությունների ցուցակ (Armenian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Մոլորությունների ցուցակ" in Armenian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Armenian rank
1st place
1st place
6th place
6th place
3rd place
17th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,549th place
2nd place
4th place
9,048th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,379th place
705th place
26th place
73rd place
low place
low place
4,757th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,711th place
613th place
815th place
2,754th place
6,293rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,491st place
low place
5,047th place
low place
254th place
326th place
low place
low place
7,869th place
low place
low place
low place
3,837th place
4,911th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
614th place
201st place

alleydog.com

archive.org

  • Hornby, A. S. (2010). «sophist». Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780194799003.
  • Carrier, Richard (2012). Proving History: Bayes's Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus. Prometheus Books. էջ 26-29. ISBN 9781616145590.
  • Frankena, W. K. (1939 թ․ հոկտեմբեր). «The Naturalistic Fallacy». Mind. Oxford University Press. 48 (192): 464–477. doi:10.1093/mind/XLVIII.192.464. JSTOR 2250706.
  • Copi, Cohen, էջեր 206–207
  • Fischer, 1970, էջեր 119–120
  • Fischer, 1970, էջեր 209–213
  • Fischer, 1970, էջեր 4–8
  • Fischer, 1970, էջ 127
  • Copi, Cohen, էջեր 105–107
  • Byerly, Henry (1973). A primer of logic. Harper & Row. ISBN 0060411139.

blackwellreference.com

books.google.com

cf.ac.uk

orca.cf.ac.uk

  • Shackel, Nicholas (2005). «The Vacuity of Postmodernist Methodology» (PDF). Metaphilosophy. 36 (3): 295–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.x. Արխիվացված (PDF) օրիգինալից 2020 թ․ հոկտեմբերի 13-ին. Վերցված է 2020 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 6-ին. «For my purposes the desirable but only lightly defensible territory of the Motte and Bailey castle, that is to say, the Bailey, represents a philosophical doctrine or position with similar properties: desirable to its proponent but only lightly defensible. The Motte is the defensible but undesired position to which one retreats when hard pressed ...»

changingminds.org

dailymaverick.co.za

davidbergan.com

davidlavery.net

doi.org

don-lindsay-archive.org

economist.com

fallacyfiles.org

financialpost.com

gmu.edu

mason.gmu.edu

hbr.org

heterodoxacademy.org

jstor.org

logicalfallacies.info

logicallyfallacious.com

nizkor.org

oswego.edu

cs.oswego.edu

ox.ac.uk

blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk

  • Shackel, Nicholas (2014 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 5). «Motte and Bailey Doctrines». Practical Ethics: Ethics in the News. Cardiff University / University of Oxford. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ մայիսի 14-ին. Վերցված է 2019 թ․ մայիսի 23-ին. «Some people have spoken of a Motte and Bailey Doctrine as being a fallacy and others of it being a matter of strategic equivocation. Strictly speaking, neither is correct.»

skepdic.com

thedailybell.com

thefreedictionary.com

toolkitforthinking.com

txstate.edu

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

web.archive.org