Նատուրալիզմ (Armenian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Նատուրալիզմ" in Armenian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Armenian rank

6web.archive.org

1^st place

3stanford.edu

179^th place

119^th place

3stephenjaygould.org

low place

3,781^st place

2google.am

6,495^th place

5^th place

1oed.com

360^th place

520^th place

1newadvent.org

471^st place

412^th place

1secularhumanism.org

low place

1tcd.ie

5,099^th place

low place

1telegraph.co.uk

30^th place

132^nd place

1pandasthumb.org

low place

1archive.today

14^th place

48^th place

1calvin.edu

9,834^th place

9,341^st place

1beliefnet.com

5,009^th place

4,955^th place

1amazon.com

105^th place

463^rd place

1talkorigins.org

9,502^nd place

4,754^th place

1wikisource.org

27^th place

11^th place

1msu.edu

1,844^th place

714^th place

1nd.edu

2,387^th place

4,514^th place

1loc.gov

70^th place

118^th place

1giffordlectures.org

low place

1chronicle.com

3,169^th place

5,261^st place

1archive.org

6^th place

1stnews.org

low place

amazon.com

Elaine Ecklund's book "Science versus Religion: What do scientists really think"

archive.org

Plantinga, Alvin (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chap. 11. ISBN 0-19-507863-2.

archive.today

«ASA March 2006 – Re: Methodological Naturalism». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2012 թ․ օգոստոսի 1-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. {{cite web}}: More than one of |archivedate= and |archive-date= specified (օգնություն); More than one of |archiveurl= and |archive-url= specified (օգնություն)

beliefnet.com

blog.beliefnet.com

Belief Net, "What do scientists say"

calvin.edu

«ASA March 2006 – Re: Methodological Naturalism». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2012 թ․ օգոստոսի 1-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. {{cite web}}: More than one of |archivedate= and |archive-date= specified (օգնություն); More than one of |archiveurl= and |archive-url= specified (օգնություն)

chronicle.com

Plantinga, Alvin (2010 թ․ ապրիլի 11). «Evolution, Shibboleths, and Philosophers — Letters to the Editor». The Chronicle of Higher Education. «...I do indeed think that evolution functions as a contemporary shibboleth by which to distinguish the ignorant fundamentalist goats from the informed and scientifically literate sheep.

According to Richard Dawkins, 'It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).' Daniel Dennett goes Dawkins one (or two) further: 'Anyone today who doubts that the variety of life on this planet was produced by a process of evolution is simply ignorant—inexcusably ignorant.' You wake up in the middle of the night; you think, can that whole Darwinian story really be true? Wham! You are inexcusably ignorant.

I do think that evolution has become a modern idol of the tribe. But of course it doesn't even begin to follow that I think the scientific theory of evolution is false. And I don't.»

giffordlectures.org

«Gifford Lecture Series - Warrant and Proper Function 1987-1988». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2012 թ․ հունվարի 4-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. {{cite web}}: More than one of |archivedate= and |archive-date= specified (օգնություն); More than one of |archiveurl= and |archive-url= specified (օգնություն)

google.am

books.google.am

Beilby, J.K. (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. Cornell University Press. էջ 9. ISBN 9780801487637. LCCN 2001006111.
Lynne Rudder (2013). Naturalism and the First-Person Perspective. Oxford University Press. էջ 5. ISBN 0199914745.

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

Beilby, J.K. (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. Cornell University Press. էջ 9. ISBN 9780801487637. LCCN 2001006111.

msu.edu

Robert T. Pennock, Supernaturalist Explanations and the Prospects for a Theistic Science or "How do you know it was the lettuce?"

nd.edu

philosophy.nd.edu

http://philosophy.nd.edu/people/alvin-plantinga/

newadvent.org

«CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Naturalism». 2009 թ․ նոյեմբերի 21. Վերցված է 2012 թ․ մարտի 6-ին. «Naturalism is not so much a special system as a point of view or tendency common to a number of philosophical and religious systems; not so much a well-defined set of positive and negative doctrines as an attitude or spirit pervading and influencing many doctrines. As the name implies, this tendency consists essentially in looking upon nature as the one original and fundamental source of all that exists, and in attempting to explain everything in terms of nature. Either the limits of nature are also the limits of existing reality, or at least the first cause, if its existence is found necessary, has nothing to do with the working of natural agencies. All events, therefore, find their adequate explanation within nature itself. But, as the terms nature and natural are themselves used in more than one sense, the term naturalism is also far from having one fixed meaning.»

oed.com

Oxford English Dictionary Online naturalism Subscription needed, possibly via a library.

pandasthumb.org

Nick Matzke: On the Origins of Methodological Naturalism Արխիվացված 2006-09-03 Wayback Machine. The Pandas Thumb (March 20, 2006)

secularhumanism.org

Kurtz, Paul (Spring 1998). «Darwin Re-Crucified: Why Are So Many Afraid of Naturalism?». Free Inquiry. 18 (2).

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Papineau, David "Naturalism", in "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" Papineau used the term "ontological" instead of "metaphysical."
Papineau, David "Naturalism", in "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy"
Feldman, Richard (2012). «Naturalized Epistemology». In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 ed.). Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 4-ին. «Quinean Replacement Naturalism finds relatively few supporters.»

stephenjaygould.org

Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Methodological naturalism is the adoption or assumption of naturalism in scientific belief and practice without really believing in naturalism.»
Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Naturalism did not exist as a philosophy before the nineteenth century, but only as an occasionally adopted and non-rigorous method among natural philosophers. It is a unique philosophy in that it is not ancient or prior to science, and that it developed largely due to the influence of science.»
Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Naturalism is almost unique in that it would not exist as a philosophy without the prior existence of science. It shares this status, in my view, with the philosophy of existentialism.»

stnews.org

Plantinga, Alvin (2006 թ․ մարտի 7). «Whether ID is science isn't semantics». Science & Theology News. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 2006 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 27-ին. Վերցված է 2024 թ․ փետրվարի 20-ին.

talkorigins.org

Kitzmiller trial: testimony of Robert T. Pennock

tcd.ie

maths.tcd.ie

Rouse Ball, W. W. [1908] (2003) "Pierre Simon Laplace (1749–1827)", in A Short Account of the History of Mathematics, 4th ed., Dover, ISBN 0-486-20630-0

telegraph.co.uk

Williams, Sally (2007 թ․ հուլիսի 4). «The God curriculum». London: The Telegraph. Վերցված է 2008 թ․ դեկտեմբերի 26–ին-ին.(չաշխատող հղում)

web.archive.org

Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Methodological naturalism is the adoption or assumption of naturalism in scientific belief and practice without really believing in naturalism.»
Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Naturalism did not exist as a philosophy before the nineteenth century, but only as an occasionally adopted and non-rigorous method among natural philosophers. It is a unique philosophy in that it is not ancient or prior to science, and that it developed largely due to the influence of science.»
Schafersman, Steven D. (1996). «Naturalism is Today An Essential Part of Science». Section "The Origin of Naturalism and Its Relation to Science". Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2019 թ․ հուլիսի 5-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. «Naturalism is almost unique in that it would not exist as a philosophy without the prior existence of science. It shares this status, in my view, with the philosophy of existentialism.»
Nick Matzke: On the Origins of Methodological Naturalism Արխիվացված 2006-09-03 Wayback Machine. The Pandas Thumb (March 20, 2006)
«Gifford Lecture Series - Warrant and Proper Function 1987-1988». Արխիվացված է օրիգինալից 2012 թ․ հունվարի 4-ին. Վերցված է 2014 թ․ հունիսի 14-ին. {{cite web}}: More than one of |archivedate= and |archive-date= specified (օգնություն); More than one of |archiveurl= and |archive-url= specified (օգնություն)
Plantinga, Alvin (2006 թ․ մարտի 7). «Whether ID is science isn't semantics». Science & Theology News. Արխիվացված օրիգինալից 2006 թ․ սեպտեմբերի 27-ին. Վերցված է 2024 թ․ փետրվարի 20-ին.

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

Kitzmiller v. Dover: Whether ID is Science