Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Area C (Tepi Barat) (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Area C (Tepi Barat)" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Indonesian rank
3books.google.com
3rd place
6th place
2doi.org
2nd place
4th place
2web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
1worldbank.org
231st place
142nd place
1cbs.gov.il
1,276th place
1,417th place
1haaretz.com
497th place
948th place
1btselem.org
low place
4,557th place
1archive.org
6th place
2nd place
1jstor.org
26th place
53rd place
1ilo.org
1,962nd place
857th place
1un.org
97th place
71st place
1bbc.co.uk
8th place
18th place
1mfa.gov.il
2,707th place
1,517th place
1ochaopt.org
low place
low place

archive.org

  • Roberts, Adam (1990). "Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967". The American Journal of International Law. American Society of International Law. 84 (1): 85–86. doi:10.2307/2203016. JSTOR 2203016. The international community has taken a critical view of both deportations and settlements as being contrary to international law. General Assembly resolutions have condemned the deportations since 1969, and have done so by overwhelming majorities in recent years. Likewise, they have consistently deplored the establishment of settlements, and have done so by overwhelming majorities throughout the period (since the end of 1976) of the rapid expansion in their numbers. The Security Council has also been critical of deportations and settlements; and other bodies have viewed them as an obstacle to peace, and illegal under international law. 

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

  • "What next for Gaza and West Bank?". BBC. 30 August 2005. Diakses tanggal 5 January 2010. Most Israelis support the pullout, but some feel the government has given in to Palestinian militant groups, and worry that further withdrawals will follow. Palestinian critics point out that Gaza will remain under Israeli control, and that they are being denied a political say in the disengagement process. 

books.google.com

  • Salah, Hassan; Kidd, Michael (26 October 2018). Family Practice in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Universal Health Coverage and Quality Primary Care. ISBN 9781351016018. 
  • Yearbook of the United Nations 2005. United Nations Publications. 2007. hlm. 514. ISBN 9789211009675. The Israeli Government was preparing to implement an unprecedented initiative: the disengagement of all Israeli civilians and forces from the Gaza Strip and the dismantling of four settlements in the northern West Bank. 
  • Yael Yishai (1987). Land Or Peace. Hoover Press. hlm. 58. ISBN 9780817985233. During 1982 Israel's government stuck to its territorial policy in word and deed. All the settlements in Sinai were evacuated in accordance with the Camp David Accords, but settlement activity in the other territories continued uninterrupted. A few days after the final withdrawal from Sinai had been completed, Begin announced that he would introduce a resolution barring future governments from dismantling settlements, even as a result of peace negotiations. 

btselem.org

cbs.gov.il

doi.org

  • Roberts, Adam (1990). "Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967". The American Journal of International Law. American Society of International Law. 84 (1): 85–86. doi:10.2307/2203016. JSTOR 2203016. The international community has taken a critical view of both deportations and settlements as being contrary to international law. General Assembly resolutions have condemned the deportations since 1969, and have done so by overwhelming majorities in recent years. Likewise, they have consistently deplored the establishment of settlements, and have done so by overwhelming majorities throughout the period (since the end of 1976) of the rapid expansion in their numbers. The Security Council has also been critical of deportations and settlements; and other bodies have viewed them as an obstacle to peace, and illegal under international law. 
  • Barak-Erez, Daphne (2006). "Israel: The security barrier—between international law, constitutional law, and domestic judicial review". International Journal of Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press. 4 (3): 548. doi:10.1093/icon/mol021 alt=Dapat diakses gratis. The real controversy hovering over all the litigation on the security barrier concerns the fate of the Israeli settlements in the occupied territories. Since 1967, Israel has allowed and even encouraged its citizens to live in the new settlements established in the territories, motivated by religious and national sentiments attached to the history of the Jewish nation in the land of Israel. This policy has also been justified in terms of security interests, taking into consideration the dangerous geographic circumstances of Israel before 1967 (where Israeli areas on the Mediterranean coast were potentially threatened by Jordanian control of the West Bank ridge). The international community, for its part, has viewed this policy as patently illegal, based on the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention that prohibit moving populations to or from territories under occupation. 

haaretz.com

ilo.org

  • International Labour Organization (2005). "The situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories" (PDF). hlm. 14. The international community considers Israeli settlements within the occupied territories illegal and in breach of, inter alia, United Nations Security Council resolution 465 of 1 March 1980 calling on Israel "to dismantle the existing settlements and in particular to cease, on an urgent basis, the establishment, construction and planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem". 

jstor.org

  • Roberts, Adam (1990). "Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967". The American Journal of International Law. American Society of International Law. 84 (1): 85–86. doi:10.2307/2203016. JSTOR 2203016. The international community has taken a critical view of both deportations and settlements as being contrary to international law. General Assembly resolutions have condemned the deportations since 1969, and have done so by overwhelming majorities in recent years. Likewise, they have consistently deplored the establishment of settlements, and have done so by overwhelming majorities throughout the period (since the end of 1976) of the rapid expansion in their numbers. The Security Council has also been critical of deportations and settlements; and other bodies have viewed them as an obstacle to peace, and illegal under international law. 

mfa.gov.il

ochaopt.org

un.org

domino.un.org

web.archive.org

worldbank.org

openknowledge.worldbank.org