Thursby, Gene (2004). The Hindu World (dalam bahasa Inggris). Routledge. hlm. 729-730. ISBN978-0415772273.Parameter |first1= tanpa |last1= di Authors list (bantuan)Pemeliharaan CS1: Tanpa pipa (link)
[a] Humphreys, Christmas (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. hlm. 42–43. ISBN978-1-136-22877-3. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-01-11. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [b] Gombrich, Richard F. (2009). What the Buddha Thought. Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies monographs. hlm. 47., Quote: "(...) Buddha's teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This 'no-soul doctrine' (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon."
[a]"Anatta: Buddhism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2013. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Collins, Steven (1994). Reynolds, Frank; Tracy, David, ed. Religion and Practical Reason. State Univ of New York Press. hlm. 64. ISBN978-0791422175., Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Javanaud, Katie (2013). "Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?". Philosophy Now. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2015-02-06. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [e] Loy, David (1982). "Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?". International Philosophical Quarterly. 23 (1): 65–74.
Neville, Robert (2004). Hackett, Jeremiah, ed. Philosophy of Religion for a New Century: Essays in Honor of Eugene Thomas Long. Jerald Wallulis. Springer. hlm. 257. ISBN978-1-4020-2073-5., Quote: "[Buddhism's ontological hypotheses] that nothing in reality has its own-being and that all phenomena reduce to the relativities of pratitya samutpada. The Buddhist ontological hypothesese deny that there is any ontologically ultimate object such a God, Brahman, the Dao, or any transcendent creative source or principle."
[a] Humphreys, Christmas (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. hlm. 42–43. ISBN978-1-136-22877-3. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-01-11. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [b] Gombrich, Richard F. (2009). What the Buddha Thought. Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies monographs. hlm. 47., Quote: "(...) Buddha's teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This 'no-soul doctrine' (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon."
"Nyaya: Indian Philosophy". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
"Mimamsa". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2014. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
"Dravya: Jainism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
"Anatta: Buddhism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2013. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
[a]"Anatta: Buddhism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2013. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Collins, Steven (1994). Reynolds, Frank; Tracy, David, ed. Religion and Practical Reason. State Univ of New York Press. hlm. 64. ISBN978-0791422175., Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Javanaud, Katie (2013). "Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?". Philosophy Now. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2015-02-06. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [e] Loy, David (1982). "Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?". International Philosophical Quarterly. 23 (1): 65–74.
carvaka4india.com
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (21-08-2011). "Materialism in India: A Synoptic View". cārvāka 4 india (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2016-03-04. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
Brancaccio, Pia (2014). Cave Architecture of India, in Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer. hlm. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_9848-1. ISBN978-94-007-3934-5.
philosophynow.org
[a]"Anatta: Buddhism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2013. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Collins, Steven (1994). Reynolds, Frank; Tracy, David, ed. Religion and Practical Reason. State Univ of New York Press. hlm. 64. ISBN978-0791422175., Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Javanaud, Katie (2013). "Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?". Philosophy Now. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2015-02-06. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [e] Loy, David (1982). "Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?". International Philosophical Quarterly. 23 (1): 65–74.
philtar.ac.uk
"Ajivikas". Overview of World Religions Project (dalam bahasa Inggris). University of Cumbria. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-07-17. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
stanford.edu
plato.stanford.edu
Chadha, Monima (22-06-2015). "2.2 Nyāya realism". Perceptual Experience and Concepts in Classical Indian Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-03-26. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
Ganeri, Jonardon (29-05-2019). "2.2 Vaiśeṣika Atomism". Analytical philosophy in early modern India. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-03-18. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
utm.edu
iep.utm.edu
Bryant, Edwin. "The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Rutgers University. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-05-18. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
Bryant, Edwin. "The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Rutgers University. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-05-18. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
Chadha, Monima (22-06-2015). "2.2 Nyāya realism". Perceptual Experience and Concepts in Classical Indian Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-03-26. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
Ganeri, Jonardon (29-05-2019). "2.2 Vaiśeṣika Atomism". Analytical philosophy in early modern India. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-03-18. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
[a] Humphreys, Christmas (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. hlm. 42–43. ISBN978-1-136-22877-3. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-01-11. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [b] Gombrich, Richard F. (2009). What the Buddha Thought. Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies monographs. hlm. 47., Quote: "(...) Buddha's teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This 'no-soul doctrine' (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon."
[a]"Anatta: Buddhism". Encyclopædia Britannica (dalam bahasa Inggris). 2013. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Collins, Steven (1994). Reynolds, Frank; Tracy, David, ed. Religion and Practical Reason. State Univ of New York Press. hlm. 64. ISBN978-0791422175., Quote: "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Javanaud, Katie (2013). "Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?". Philosophy Now. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2015-02-06. Diakses tanggal 2020-03-02. [e] Loy, David (1982). "Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?". International Philosophical Quarterly. 23 (1): 65–74.
"Ajivikas". Overview of World Religions Project (dalam bahasa Inggris). University of Cumbria. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2019-07-17. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date= (bantuan)
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (21-08-2011). "Materialism in India: A Synoptic View". cārvāka 4 india (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2016-03-04. Diakses tanggal 03-03-2020.Periksa nilai tanggal di: |access-date=, |date= (bantuan)
worldcat.org
Nicholson 2014, Chapter 9. Nicholson, Andrew J. (2014), Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History (dalam bahasa Inggris), Columbia University Press, ISBN978-0231149877, OCLC881368213
Nicholson 2014, hlm. 158-162. Nicholson, Andrew J. (2014), Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History (dalam bahasa Inggris), Columbia University Press, ISBN978-0231149877, OCLC881368213