The Palestine Post, 27 September 1934, p. 6 (via National Library of Israel, Tel Aviv University: JPress - collection of historical Jewish press) [2]Diarsipkan 2020-09-19 di Wayback Machine.
jstor.org
Geva, Hillel (1981). "The 'Tower of David'—Phasael or Hippicus?". Israel Exploration Journal. 31 (1/2): 57–65. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-02-12. Diakses tanggal 8 June 2016 – via JSTOR. (Perlu mendaftar (help)). While biblical scholar Robinson and archaeologist Geva proposed that the tower known as Hippicus be identified with the "Tower of David," this proposal was not accepted by archaeologists J. Fergusson, Thomas Lewin, Schick, G.A. Smith, C. Warren and C.R. Conder, who held that the tower of Phasael should be identified with the "Tower of David," based on its size.
Geva, Hillel (1981). "The 'Tower of David'—Phasael or Hippicus?". Israel Exploration Journal. 31 (1/2): 57–65. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2023-02-12. Diakses tanggal 8 June 2016 – via JSTOR. (Perlu mendaftar (help)). While biblical scholar Robinson and archaeologist Geva proposed that the tower known as Hippicus be identified with the "Tower of David," this proposal was not accepted by archaeologists J. Fergusson, Thomas Lewin, Schick, G.A. Smith, C. Warren and C.R. Conder, who held that the tower of Phasael should be identified with the "Tower of David," based on its size.
Todd Bolen, The Whereabouts of the Jaffa Gate Clock Tower, 17 April 2010 [1]Diarsipkan 2016-08-22 di Wayback Machine.
The Palestine Post, 27 September 1934, p. 6 (via National Library of Israel, Tel Aviv University: JPress - collection of historical Jewish press) [2]Diarsipkan 2020-09-19 di Wayback Machine.
