Maha Benar (Filsafat) (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Maha Benar (Filsafat)" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Indonesian rank

2^nd place

4^th place

3^rd place

6^th place

26^th place

53^rd place

27^th place

81^st place

163^rd place

114^th place

2,932^nd place

3,848^th place

books.google.com

Frederick Charles Copleston (1963). History of Philosophy: Fichte to Nietzsche. Paulist Press. hlm. 166–180. ISBN 978-0-8091-0071-2.
Martin Heidegger (2002). Heidegger: Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge University Press. hlm. 97–98. ISBN 978-0-521-80507-0.
Frederick Charles Copleston (2003). 18th and 19th Century German Philosophy. A&C Black. hlm. 173–174. ISBN 978-0-8264-6901-4.
Hajime Nakamura (1964). The Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India-China-Tibet-Japan. University of Hawaii Press. hlm. 53–57. ISBN 978-0-8248-0078-9. , Quote: "Thus the ultimate Absolute presumed by the Indians is not a personal god but an impersonal and metaphysical Principle. Here we can see the impersonal character of the Absolute in Indian thought. The inclination of grasping Absolute negatively necessarily leads (as Hegel would say) to the negation of the negative expression itself."

Sprigge, T. L. S. (1998). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N001-1.
Umehara, Takeshi (1970). "Heidegger and Buddhism". Philosophy East and West. 20 (3): 271–281. doi:10.2307/1398308. JSTOR 1398308.
Orru, Marco; Wang, Amy (1992). "Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 31 (1): 47–61. doi:10.2307/1386831. JSTOR 1386831.
Richards, Glyn (1995). "Modern Hinduism". Studies in Religion. Palgrave Macmillan. hlm. 117–127. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24147-7_9. ISBN 978-1-349-24149-1.
Chaudhuri, Haridas (1954). "The Concept of Brahman in Hindu Philosophy". Philosophy East and West. 4 (1): 47–66. doi:10.2307/1396951. JSTOR 1396951. , Quote: "The Self or Atman is the Absolute viewed from the subjective standpoint (arkara), or a real mode of existence of the Absolute."
Simoni-Wastila, Henry (2002). "Māyā and radical particularity: Can particular persons be one with Brahman?". International Journal of Hindu Studies. Springer. 6 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11407-002-0009-5.

Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "The Absolute". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. See for the development of Hegel's idea of "the absolute." Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln IV, Hegelian Dialectical Analysis of U.S. Voting Laws, 42 U. Dayton L. Rev. 87 (2017). See Lincoln, Charles The Dialectical Path of Law, 2021 Rowman & Littlefield.

Umehara, Takeshi (1970). "Heidegger and Buddhism". Philosophy East and West. 20 (3): 271–281. doi:10.2307/1398308. JSTOR 1398308.
Orru, Marco; Wang, Amy (1992). "Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 31 (1): 47–61. doi:10.2307/1386831. JSTOR 1386831.
Chaudhuri, Haridas (1954). "The Concept of Brahman in Hindu Philosophy". Philosophy East and West. 4 (1): 47–66. doi:10.2307/1396951. JSTOR 1396951. , Quote: "The Self or Atman is the Absolute viewed from the subjective standpoint (arkara), or a real mode of existence of the Absolute."

Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "The Absolute". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. See for the development of Hegel's idea of "the absolute." Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln IV, Hegelian Dialectical Analysis of U.S. Voting Laws, 42 U. Dayton L. Rev. 87 (2017). See Lincoln, Charles The Dialectical Path of Law, 2021 Rowman & Littlefield.