Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Indonesian rank
1st place
1st place
2,894th place
9,846th place
low place
low place
301st place
299th place
9,965th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2nd place
4th place
12th place
49th place
2,447th place
2,383rd place
low place
low place
791st place
894th place
4,555th place
low place
4,161st place
8,977th place
1,512th place
364th place
30th place
103rd place
5th place
7th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

abs-cbnnews.com

  • "Shanghai rankings rattle European universities". ABS-CBN Interactive. 8 December 2010. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015. France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities. 

csmonitor.com

doi.org

  • Pavel, Adina-Petruta (2015). "Global university rankings - a comparative analysis". Procedia Economics and Finance. 26: 54–63. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2alt=Dapat diakses gratis. 

edmontonjournal.com

  • Indira Samarasekera & Carl Amrhein. "Top schools don't always get top marks". The Edmonton Journal. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal October 3, 2010. There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings. 

hepi.ac.uk

  • Bahram Bekhradnia (15 December 2016). "International university rankings: For good or ill?" (PDF). Higher Education Policy Institute. hlm. 16. Diakses tanggal 10 June 2017. ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed. 

insidehighered.com

  • Philip G. Altbach (11 November 2010). "The State of the Rankings". Inside Higher Ed. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2014-12-19. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015. The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE). 

isihighlycited.com

lajeunepolitique.com

mathunion.org

nobelprize.org

nst.com.my

qswownews.com

shanghairanking.cn

shanghairanking.com

telegraph.co.uk

theguardian.com

web.archive.org

webofknowledge.com

sub3.webofknowledge.com

worldcat.org